Debate: Should N-Pulse Remain on the Classic Tab? - Page 4

Rufus · #46 07-29-2010, 03:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fulg0reSama

I don't mean to derail.. But I'm curious.. and this is only because I want to know how come N-Pulse is in desire need of deletion when you've got valikorlia sitting pretty with even less than us. I mean sure make target of N-Pulse if you don't like it, But at least tell me why. N-Pulse needs to be ahead in line for deletion rather than Valikorlia?

Valikorlia isn't comprised of broken content.

kia345 · #47 07-29-2010, 03:59 AM

That's because other than the head/body viewer, there isn't any content that isn't a level or image

Fulg0reSama · #48 07-29-2010, 04:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rufus

Valikorlia isn't comprised of broken content.

Neither are we. Get your facts together.

On top of that they're full of half baked ganis that serve no usefulness, while having just as long as us to rebuild and yet playability is even less than our own. Is broken content the only point you guys are going to shove down peoples throats anyways?

nullify · #49 07-29-2010, 04:01 AM

And the truth comes out.

Fulg0reSama · #50 07-29-2010, 04:03 AM

The only thing I wanna get straight is.. There's more than just N-Pulse if you're going to talk about "broken down" or contentless servers.

sssssssssss · #51 07-29-2010, 04:04 AM

As far as I've seen Valkoria doesn't keep wanting to "redo" the entire server, and fail horribly each time.

N-Pulse still needs to follow the rules of no gs1 (I know other servers may have gs1 but for the most part have complied). N-Pulse needs a solid direction to go in and go there, period. I haven't heard anything at all about Valkoria being redone or anything, but I could simply have missed it I suppose. I always thought that what was there was it, besides new, little things, that servers like UN, Zodiac, and Era do and should do to bring new content.

I'm not even bashing Npulse. Np is my home technically, and I would love to see the classic server come back, even though I still probably wouldn't play it because of my own server.

Fulg0reSama · #52 07-29-2010, 04:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sssssssssss

As far as I've seen Valkoria doesn't keep wanting to "redo" the entire server, and fail horribly each time.

N-Pulse still needs to follow the rules of no gs1 (I know other servers may have gs1 but for the most part have complied). N-Pulse needs a solid direction to go in and go there, period. I haven't heard anything at all about Valkoria being redone or anything, but I could simply have missed it I suppose. I always that what was there was it, besides new, little things, that servers like UN, Zodiac, and Era do and should do to bring new content.

I'm not even bashing Npulse. Np is my home technically, and I would love to see the classic server come back, even though I still probably wouldn't play it because of my own server.

Well you realize each "redo" was most likely under different management right? We also are complying to it, Otherwise we wouldn't be attempting to try. We have our solid direction and it has been realized, Valikorlia has been in "heavy development" basically like us for quite a while. I know you're not trying to bash n-pulse, you're simply stating your opinion and thoughts, i'm just willing to fix small inconsistencies with what people are saying about the server.

sssssssssss · #53 07-29-2010, 04:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fulg0reSama

Well you realize each "redo" was most likely under different management right? We also are complying to it, Otherwise we wouldn't be attempting to try. We have our solid direction and it has been realized, Valikorlia has been in "heavy development" basically like us for quite a while. I know you're not trying to bash n-pulse, you're simply stating your opinion and thoughts, i'm just willing to fix small inconsistencies with what people are saying about the server.

Complying to gs2 standards has nothing to do with redoing the server over and over.

Also, if there can't seem to be stable management to finish anything whatsoever, how does that help any arguement to keep Npulse classic at all? Trying and failing over and over doesn't give an excuse to break rules every other single server SHOULD have to follow, and very few that have followed it. Again, not being rude at all.

Like I said, I don't really know valkorias state. If they are under "heavy management" like you say for longer than N-Pulse, then both servers need to go imo.

Fulg0reSama · #54 07-29-2010, 04:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sssssssssss

Complying to gs2 standards has nothing to do with redoing the server over and over.

Also, if there can't seem to be stable management to finish anything whatsoever, how does that help any arguement to keep Npulse classic at all?

Like I said, I don't really know valkorias state. If they are under "heavy management" like you say for longer than N-Pulse, then both servers need to go imo.

I said as long, not longer. I'm not really arguing sides here, I just don't want people having the wrong idea due to ignorance or being misinformed. Redoing the server over and over.. Not really of my concern considering this hasn't been you know... My problem, This is more fault of the previous managers who haven't had a solid direction as you stated Period.

nullify · #55 07-29-2010, 04:16 AM

Perhaps if it was off the list the development staff wouldn't be distracted by players. Then they could work instead of sitting around bsing.

sssssssssss · #56 07-29-2010, 04:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fulg0reSama

...Valikorlia has been in "heavy development" basically like us for quite a while.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fulg0reSama

I said as long, not longer.

Just pointing that out. To me it infers the same length of time basically (and by basically I mean at the least).

Everything I said in my previous post is pretty close to what has happened, so it is neither ignorant or from being misinformed whatsoever (except valkoria which I explicitly stated I wasen't actually sure on).

Anyways, put my 2 cents in. All servers should constantly have to live up to the standards of the requirement to get into classic tab, and Npulse has been far from it for a very very long time. So...
"Debate: Should N-Pulse Remain on the Classic Tab? "

...no.

Akira_P2P · #57 07-29-2010, 04:19 AM

As far as that goes, null, things are getting done. It may not be the quickest thing in the world, but it's getting done. It's hard to find developers that want to work on N-Pulse because everyone keeps talking bad about N-Pulse while they're snuggled nice and tight inside a server that they contribute nothing to. All they want is to belittle a server that they probably haven't logged onto in years, and for what? A little agreement from someone that they most likely idolize? People need to just shut up about N-Pulse and let us do our thing. Maybe then, people would start coming on with an interest to help our development staff out.

nullify · #58 07-29-2010, 04:38 AM

Maybe the quality developers aren't interested because the management can't make up their damn minds about what they want to do.

Akira_P2P · #59 07-29-2010, 04:41 AM

I'll continue to believe that it's because the majority of the population says N-Pulse is dead, and other redundant things that they know nothing about.

Rufus · #60 07-29-2010, 04:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fulg0reSama

Neither are we. Get your facts together.

On top of that they're full of half baked ganis that serve no usefulness, while having just as long as us to rebuild and yet playability is even less than our own. Is broken content the only point you guys are going to shove down peoples throats anyways?

I walk across N-Pulse's map and everything is closed off, and I constantly get warped, yet my facts are wrong? N-Pulse is a broken server.