What do you think of the current Classic worlds? - Page 3

maximus_asinus · #31 10-16-2006, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Luda

Me too

I used to be able to play it for hours but now I'm just bored of it

I was online for only a couple hours at most last week. I remember years ago and being addicted to this game. I guess I am starting to build an immunity to whatever Stefan puts in my water.

Crono · #32 10-17-2006, 02:56 PM

Atlantis-

Useless. I am being literal. I don't care if it's German, it's USELESS. It does not have a playerbase at all and has nothing to show. Why is it still up? Who knows.

Classic-

I had fun on it during the summer but it's too boring for me.

Delteria-

They're making a new Delteria, which is why I think it should be removed from the list and then re-added when the new one is ready.

Era-

It's ok.

Maloria-

I never liked this RPG Maloria. It became popular the moment Val's own RPG system was changed in favor of a more text based system and worldmap.

N-Pulse-

Old server, boring.

Unholy Nation-

Low quality, sacks of potatoes run the server, only thing to do is spar.

Valikorlia-

Been personally waiting for New Val since late 2004. Val was amazingly fun from 2002-early 2004. Went downhill after Jesse was removed from Manager, and I don't care what the reason is.

Zodiac-

Garbage. The only thing keeping it going is it's gameplay, and even Yen admitted that it's ripped from multiple games.

Demisis_P2P · #33 10-17-2006, 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerami

Zodiac-

Garbage. The only thing keeping it going is it's gameplay, and even Yen admitted that it's ripped from multiple games.

Zodiac is one of the most graphically ugly servers I've seen in a long time.
When I first logged on I was like "Wtf? Who in their right mind would create a tileset that's uglier than the default one?!!?!?".
And then I noticed crap like "feign death" which is obviously jacked from another game, and I've not logged back on since.
Zodiac doesn't really bring anything new or original to Graal at all.

Crono · #34 10-17-2006, 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Demisis_P2P

Zodiac doesn't really bring anything new or original to Graal at all.

Obviously today's Graal community prefers addictive ripped off gameplay to quality. I mean Zodiac does not have proper cliffing and still passed? It's pretty hard to make your tileset uglier than pics1.png, but Zodiac somehow managed to do it.

Oh well, we're not bashing a playerworld...simply pointing out it's flaws right?

The Evil Within · #35 10-18-2006, 06:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Devil

Bah if you take them off classic, they should be permanently taken off, not moved over to hosted.

Why is this? The new overworld being worked on Delteria far exceeds the level quality of ANY other server on Graal I have ever seen, and the plans for all of the systems are incredibly amazing. I happen to agree that it should be taken off the classic tab due to the fact that it averages a playerbase of 2, and maybe once a month will hit 20 players when the people from the Delteria forums decide they all want to log on and PK eachother, but to completely take it down and stop any development being made is probably the dumbest suggestion I've heard. Just because the current overworld is lacking in content does not mean that the staff who are working on the server should in turn have all of their work deleted. You have to be the most ignorant person I've seen post in this thread.

Btw, Crono, are you gonna come back to Delt, or should we have somebody else head the Al Jadim project?

Skrobo2 · #36 10-18-2006, 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerami

Unholy Nation-

Low quality, sacks of potatoes run the server, only thing to do is spar.

Yen · #37 10-18-2006, 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Demisis_P2P

Zodiac is one of the most graphically ugly servers I've seen in a long time.
When I first logged on I was like "Wtf? Who in their right mind would create a tileset that's uglier than the default one?!!?!?".
And then I noticed crap like "feign death" which is obviously jacked from another game, and I've not logged back on since.
Zodiac doesn't really bring anything new or original to Graal at all.

Yeah. You totally called me.
Fireball? I stole it.
Enrage? Definately stolen.
Mug? I admit to stealing it from the Webster dictionary.

I'm definately guilty of being literate enough to think up synonyms for things that sound lame, like 'Fake Death.'

Elk · #38 10-18-2006, 09:34 PM

Zodiac is the best server on Graal atm.
Even if it's not the best graphically

xXziroXx · #39 10-18-2006, 09:46 PM

I dont play Zodiac (or any other server really..), but I do know they have alot of ugly graphics that should be replaced. Other then that, I have no bad oppinion about Zodiac.

Gambet · #40 10-18-2006, 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Demisis_P2P

Zodiac doesn't really bring anything new or original to Graal at all.

The swimming system I recently implemented is 100% unique and brand spanking new to Graal.

Yes, I agree, the graphics are fugly, but we don't exactly have a graphics team. Besides the graphics, the gameplay is rather nice. I'm sure Zodiac would attract more players with better graphics, but we lack the resources ATM.

xXziroXx · #41 10-18-2006, 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gambet

The swimming system I recently implemented is 100% unique and brand spanking new to Graal.

Yes, I agree, the graphics are fugly, but we don't exactly have a graphics team. Besides the graphics, the gameplay is rather nice. I'm sure Zodiac would attract more players with better graphics, but we lack the resources ATM.

In my eyes, graphics is 70%+ of a good gameplay.

Crono · #42 10-18-2006, 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gambet

he gameplay is rather nice

It's not that hard to rip off different games.

Quote:

Btw, Crono, are you gonna come back to Delt, or should we have somebody else head the Al Jadim project?

Have someone else do it. Babylon got rid of someone who I wanted gone for a while and so I'm back there. Babylon has priority over just about everything.

Sulukra · #43 10-18-2006, 11:29 PM

See, current Valikorlia isn't really doing all that bad, really.

Yeah, they only have RPing there! Oh no! Its a mostly community based server with no baddies and NPCs to kill!

We may not be attracting huge amounts of players, but Valikorlia still isn't doing all that bad. Me and quite a few other people still find it fun to play there.

Gambet · #44 10-19-2006, 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xXziroXx

In my eyes, graphics is 70%+ of a good gameplay.

We don't have any other options than to do with what we have. I do believe Zodiac is currently looking for graphic artists, but we have yet to find any skilled artists interested.

Infernix · #45 10-19-2006, 12:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gambet

The swimming system I recently implemented is 100% unique and brand spanking new to Graal.

Yes, I agree, the graphics are fugly, but we don't exactly have a graphics team. Besides the graphics, the gameplay is rather nice. I'm sure Zodiac would attract more players with better graphics, but we lack the resources ATM.

o Jesus yes, swimming systems. Exactly what graal needs.