Review - Renegade.

Torankusu · #1 06-27-2002, 01:35 AM

NPCs, overall, I would give around a 7. The lights, storyline(movies), systems, -other things I don't know if he wants me to tell yet-, look pretty good. The only buggy thing is the food system, and he told me that. There are two jobs I've noticed, and they look pretty original. Even the levelling up/exp system works.

Level Quality, overall, most houses were filled with levels, nice lights, things like that. And the overworld didn't look that bad either. I did find at least ONE blank level, so they get a 6 in this category.

Quests- so far, there's only two that are complete, and the only real good thing about them is the bosses and semi bosses. Most are just puzzle-rooms with baddies. (find the fairies, and such.) - 5

Creativity- I've seen some nice jobs, graphics, uses of light effects, and other stuff. 8.

Storyline - Another "SAVE THE WORLD FROM EVIL DOERS," but there's not much you can do, right? It also has a few nice movie-scenes with it.

8

More, bad things, etc. - They've told me they have about 4-5 quests under construction and some events also. I know they plan on adding more things as time passes, so I won't complain about any lackings. Fix the gi-- robot guy please. (quest might not be done, I was just playing around in levels). He doesn't shoot anything like he is supposed to.

Review statistics-
NPCs - 7
Levels - 6
Quests - 5
Creativity - 8
Storyline - 8

Score: 34
Status: FAIL

Sorry guys.

warp2ukew · #2 06-27-2002, 01:38 AM

Did they pass or fail?

Dustey4Ever · #3 06-27-2002, 01:50 AM

Alright! WE PASSED! Well yea Giru is gonna be fixed soon :P

Python523 · #4 06-27-2002, 01:53 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Dustey4Ever
Alright! WE PASSED! Well yea Giru is gonna be fixed soon :P

don't you need 3 people to pass it for it to go up?

Dustey4Ever · #5 06-27-2002, 01:54 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Python523

don't you need 3 people to pass it for it to go up?

I think so X_x then 1 down

Dustey4Ever · #6 06-27-2002, 01:56 AM

Well it doesn't say anywhere here about teh 3 people thing. So can we just go up

Torankusu · #7 06-27-2002, 01:58 AM

No.

I'd say you had at least a month's wait. Just work on those quests so that you will be able to fix them up if you go private.

Dustey4Ever · #8 06-27-2002, 02:00 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Torankusu
No.

I'd say you had at least a month's wait. Just work on those quests so that you will be able to fix them up if you go private.

So are you gonna send to the people?

Torankusu · #9 06-27-2002, 02:01 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Dustey4Ever

So are you gonna send to the people?

You'll have to.

Dustey4Ever · #10 06-27-2002, 02:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Torankusu
You'll have to.

O So I choose who the 2 other people are?

Link188 · #11 06-27-2002, 02:06 AM

Figures...new system with 3 testers to pass comes out right when we send it in. =/ O well theres 1 down, 2 to go. Hope we get the same reviews as this 1.

Dustey4Ever · #12 06-27-2002, 02:10 AM

I haven't seen Jinx on AIM for a while... maybe he'd wanna review

Jinx · #13 06-27-2002, 02:12 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Dustey4Ever
I haven't seen Jinx on AIM for a while... maybe he'd wanna review

I'm too busy to review =( I'm trying to do Cynical right now.

Toran....I thought it took 37 points to pass on the new scoring system....

-Jinx

Torankusu · #14 06-27-2002, 02:14 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jinx

I'm too busy to review =( I'm trying to do Cynical right now.

Toran....I thought it took 37 points to pass on the new scoring system....

-Jinx

7 X 5 = 36...

or was it supposed to be at least 7.5 ?

Dustey4Ever · #15 06-27-2002, 02:16 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Torankusu
7 X 5 = 36...

or was it supposed to be at least 7.5 ?

X_x

Jinx · #16 06-27-2002, 02:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Torankusu
7 X 5 = 36...

or was it supposed to be at least 7.5 ?

7.5 x.X

And I thought we rated on Creativity, Levels, NPCs, Quests, and Storyline..... Didn't we agree that it would be too hard to judge GFX? Or am I wrong about that?

-Jinx

Torankusu · #17 06-27-2002, 02:20 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jinx

7.5 x.X

And I thought we rated on Creativity, Levels, NPCs, Quests, and Storyline..... Didn't we agree that it would be too hard to judge GFX? Or am I wrong about that?

-Jinx

I think you're right. I meant to ask you, I just didn't see you on AIM.

Dustey4Ever · #18 06-27-2002, 02:21 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Torankusu
I think you're right. I meant to ask you, I just didn't see you on AIM.

So...

Dustey4Ever · #19 06-27-2002, 02:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Torankusu
Fix the gi-- robot guy please. (quest might not be done, I was just playing around in levels). He doesn't shoot anything like he is supposed to.

Dustey: I noticed that lol i think Jeice was working on that...

Petey84 · #20 06-27-2002, 02:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Dustey4Ever

So...

-Confused

Jinx · #21 06-27-2002, 02:32 AM

Renegade Failed. There was a slight mix-up on the number of points needed to pass. Torankusu thought at first it had enough to pass, but it didn't.

Sorry Renegade team =( But at least you got a decent score, hopefully you'll be able to fix up a few things and pass easily next time =)

-Jinx

Dustey4Ever · #22 06-27-2002, 02:33 AM

Why did you change it

Did you consider teh Pets? The new Bodies etc. And there were more than 2 jobs

Torankusu · #23 06-27-2002, 02:40 AM

Jinx said it for me. anyways.

I'm off to play Jedi Outcast with Spekkio.

Mykel · #24 06-27-2002, 02:59 AM

Nice try guys...juss go back and fix those things that he said and it should pass next time!

Link77 · #25 06-27-2002, 03:23 AM

well destriga has all of that maybe its time osendit in.....

warp2ukew · #26 06-27-2002, 04:16 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Torankusu
Jinx said it for me. anyways.

I'm off to play Jedi Outcast with Spekkio.

SPEKKIO? WHERE

also Gene I wanna speak with you on AIM so umm get on im NykonX2

thesaiyan · #27 06-27-2002, 06:11 AM

Hmm..
Is torankusu a PW reviwer?

he's also working on Elven Lands eh?

Is he gonna do the review like hawk did lol

--The Wizard

Torankusu · #28 06-27-2002, 06:12 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by thesaiyan
Hmm..
Is torankusu a PW reviwer?

he's also working on Elven Lands eh?

Is he gonna do the review like hawk did lol

--The Wizard

yah i sur am lolol omg llolol

konidias · #29 06-27-2002, 06:25 AM

I didn't think pw reviewers were allowed to also make playerworlds..

Anyway, the renegade team seems impatient.. obviously if there are things you need to work on, you shouldn't be so anxious to get the server online. This is exactly why all these pw's get up and they suck bad because the server just squeaks by and makes it online, then the staff think if it was good enough to get online, that it doesn't need improvements. Thus the reason we have total garbage for playerworlds.

It either goes that way, where nothing is worked on once the server is up, or it goes the opposite, where the people get their pw online and then rebuild the entire thing from scratch.

Jinx · #30 06-27-2002, 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by thesaiyan
Hmm..
Is torankusu a PW reviwer?

he's also working on Elven Lands eh?

Is he gonna do the review like hawk did lol

--The Wizard

If a PWA member makes a PW, s/he will not review it.

If a PWA member is staff on a PW, s/he will not inspect it.

It will also be checked thoroughly to make sure there is NO material ripped from previously submitted servers.

-Jinx

Brad · #31 06-27-2002, 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jinx

If a PWA member makes a PW, s/he will not review it.

If a PWA member is staff on a PW, s/he will not inspect it.

It will also be checked thoroughly to make sure there is NO material ripped from previously submitted servers.

-Jinx

You go girl.

Mykel · #32 06-27-2002, 07:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Brad

You go girl.

...umm...what he said...

konidias · #33 06-27-2002, 08:05 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jinx

If a PWA member makes a PW, s/he will not review it.

If a PWA member is staff on a PW, s/he will not inspect it.

It will also be checked thoroughly to make sure there is NO material ripped from previously submitted servers.

-Jinx

Um, but there is obviously going to be a leniancy towards a pwa member. You guys all talk with eachother and are on good terms. That's like judging your best friend on the "best friend" award. You guys judge pw's, if one of you makes a pw, don't you think the others will pass it pretty much no matter what?

Mykel · #34 06-27-2002, 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by konidias

Um, but there is obviously going to be a leniancy towards a pwa member. You guys all talk with eachother and are on good terms. That's like judging your best friend on the "best friend" award. You guys judge pw's, if one of you makes a pw, don't you think the others will pass it pretty much no matter what?

no...i think they would be professional enough not to let that interfear!

Link188 · #35 06-27-2002, 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by konidias
I didn't think pw reviewers were allowed to also make playerworlds..

Anyway, the renegade team seems impatient.. obviously if there are things you need to work on, you shouldn't be so anxious to get the server online. This is exactly why all these pw's get up and they suck bad because the server just squeaks by and makes it online, then the staff think if it was good enough to get online, that it doesn't need improvements. Thus the reason we have total garbage for playerworlds.

It either goes that way, where nothing is worked on once the server is up, or it goes the opposite, where the people get their pw online and then rebuild the entire thing from scratch.

Rob:
Well I was jsut mad but now I am relaxed me and Jeice etc are gonna fix the stuff up

. I hope I don't have as much trouble as the first time in gettting torankusu to post X_X

royce · #36 06-27-2002, 09:09 AM

I think that PWA Team should not be allowed to work on any server, or be part of creating a server. Most people quit graal and stop their server if it fails so how does anyone know that toran isnt ripping from a old reviewed pw?

freddyfox · #37 06-27-2002, 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Dustey4Ever
Well it doesn't say anywhere here about teh 3 people thing. So can we just go up

Nemesis has stated it in a previous thread. It has to pass by two reviewers and an admin before it can be put up.

Torankusu · #38 06-27-2002, 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by royce
I think that PWA Team should not be allowed to work on any server, or be part of creating a server. Most people quit graal and stop their server if it fails so how does anyone know that toran isnt ripping from a old reviewed pw?

because I've asked about 40 people to script things for me?

Why in the hell would I need to rip things from old PWs? I mean. They sucked. That's why they aren't online.

konidias · #39 06-27-2002, 12:02 PM

I'm not trying to cause trouble or anything, but I truely think that pwa team should not be able to make a playerworld while they are part of the team.

I wanted to be on the pwa team a while ago, but I thought it would be bad since I'm making Oasis. It's just not right.. it's like owning stock in your own company. You have an advantage/edge above all other players. I highly doubt if someone was part of the pwa team, and they submitted a pw, that it would fail.

Professional or not, I don't think it's a good idea at all.

Nero_2002 · #40 06-27-2002, 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by konidias
I'm not trying to cause trouble or anything, but I truely think that pwa team should not be able to make a playerworld while they are part of the team.

I wanted to be on the pwa team a while ago, but I thought it would be bad since I'm making Oasis. It's just not right.. it's like owning stock in your own company. You have an advantage/edge above all other players. I highly doubt if someone was part of the pwa team, and they submitted a pw, that it would fail.

Professional or not, I don't think it's a good idea at all.

he won't be reviewing it though, and i doubt the other reviewers will go easy on him because he is a part of the pwa