Playerworld Reviews - Page 6

JrTerrorist · #76 02-18-2003, 06:58 AM

Hmm.. yea.. I suppose NPC Count is important

Milkdude99 · #77 02-18-2003, 03:51 PM

I hope you guys like to read because if I ever post a review on a PW, it will be long and detailed. Some people complain my posts are too long and a review will look like a textbook with a commentary at the end with my opinion overall.

Soul-Blade · #78 02-19-2003, 01:20 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Milkdude99
I hope you guys like to read because if I ever post a review on a PW, it will be long and detailed. Some people complain my posts are too long and a review will look like a textbook with a commentary at the end with my opinion overall.

Haha...the outline for a review of the average PW would be -

-Levels: - 4
You must be kidding. Please, make a new tileset because this is horrid (especially for Era

).

-NPCs: - 1
Is this a joke? Go find a good script and fix this. Now.

-Story: - 2
.....................................(the silence should explain).

-Creativy: - 1
Gahahahaha

Total - 8
Complete Failure. Please, shoot yourself now.

*whistles* Doubt a single PW would get past me, as there is not a single PW which I have seen as great. The standards are so low, bad PWs rate like 40...Most should get at MOST 10...for the benefit of all of graal, a PW needs to come out with professional attributes, with quality and fullness. *cough*

Anywho. Some PWs don't count, such as the classics and the GO ran ones.

AlexH · #79 02-19-2003, 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Soul-Blade

<snip>

In your opinion the best player world that would get the highest rating from you is?

Spark910 · #80 02-19-2003, 09:13 PM

I would also be like Moongod, I feel the reviews are too under-rated and short. And okay not 3 weeks. But you should have to wait a week atleast. Things take TIME and to get your self the best review you need to allow the PWA to have time and not bother people 24/7 of AIM asking how the review is.

JrTerrorist · #81 02-19-2003, 09:18 PM

NO LONG REVIEWS
Unless you will make summaries.

Jeff · #82 02-19-2003, 09:34 PM

I LIKE long reviews.

So I say the PWA should do them. Vague reviews are no good.

PrinceDark · #83 02-19-2003, 11:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AlexH

In your opinion the best player world that would get the highest rating from you is?

The playerworld he works for.

Waiting a week is good also. Between that time the playerworlds could work on more stuff and fix things up between that time. Then if they fail they'll have more content next time they send in.

JrTerrorist · #84 02-20-2003, 04:59 AM

3 weeks of reviewing, eww.

-_-

But for long reviews, if they summarize it itll be ok o.O

Soul-Blade · #85 02-22-2003, 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AlexH

In your opinion the best player world that would get the highest rating from you is?

Heh, well I don't any of them would pass. They are all way below the quality of that such as GK. GK has good quality and can be surpassed or equalled with proper time and talent. I can't really say, but judging by the stuff I have seen Oasis might probably pass, but thats about it. Highest rating...hmm I don't know. Probably Era. They are far more original then any PW online at this time. They at least tried...may not have done a good job, but the effort is enough. Every other PW is the same old stuff.

JrTerrorist · #86 02-23-2003, 01:21 AM

GK has Stefan, obviously theyll have the best quality.

HoudiniMan · #87 02-24-2003, 09:13 AM

I also like long reviews, but unless the person reviewing the PW naturally makes them long, it's going to take longer to write the review as well

Soul-Blade · #88 02-24-2003, 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by JrTerrorist
GK has Stefan, obviously theyll have the best quality.

No. Stefan is just the best scripter in Graal, by far, and can optimize his code the best anyone in Graal can. People can still compete with Stefan's work. So the way I see it, anything under is lazyness...with time, effort, and determination (along with talent), GK could still be defeated in quality and fun factor.

Jeff · #89 02-24-2003, 04:53 PM

Stefan's scripting ability isn't much of an issue. It's more like his access to the source code.

Though even with that aside, no playerworld can ever have graphics quite so good as Kingdoms, unless someone who can produce professional-quality work is giving it away for peanuts.

Spark910 · #90 02-24-2003, 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jeff
Stefan's scripting ability isn't much of an issue. It's more like his access to the source code.

Though even with that aside, no playerworld can ever have graphics quite so good as Kingdoms, unless someone who can produce professional-quality work is giving it away for peanuts.

Or they hire a professional to do the GFX like GK did?