Should Elven Lands be put back up?

brock128 · #1 06-06-2002, 06:21 PM

As said in the post "Elven Lands", Toran is trying to get the server back up. But the admins and the PW reviewers don't want to see classic servers succeed. What do you want?

mastervampire · #2 06-06-2002, 06:42 PM

My Opinion: This is a waste of space (This Poll) because of the fact that most people dont want it back, but those people never played it with over 120 players on, i loved that server, even rose to the rank of "co-owner" numerous times -_-;;. and yea i do want it back........*sigh*

-Brett

Minoc · #3 06-06-2002, 07:25 PM

There are too many playerworlds with 1-2 players at a time =\

warp2ukew · #4 06-06-2002, 07:35 PM

BRING IT BACK

Timpan3 · #5 06-06-2002, 07:45 PM

InfernoOfFury · #6 06-07-2002, 02:23 AM

I personally dont have anything wrong with classic servers but since Elven Lands has already had its chance, I dont think It should be put back up.

haunter · #7 06-07-2002, 02:33 AM

Psyker made it a rule. NO REVIVING DEAD PWS!

zell12 · #8 06-07-2002, 02:35 AM

I don't like it, about a year ago, Disturbed Limit got someone's RC, and put all the levels on Mithica, incluiding some retarded Gralat system, and it makes you say "Stefan is a money grabbing *****!"

Torankusu · #9 06-07-2002, 02:49 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by zell12
I don't like it, about a year ago, Disturbed Limit got someone's RC, and put all the levels on Mithica, incluiding some retarded Gralat system, and it makes you say "Stefan is a money grabbing *****!"

Disturbed Limit was not affiliated with Elven Lands other than him playing on the server.

I just want it to be reviewed without bias. So what, it's a playerworld that was shut down because the owner was not where he was and Stefan did not listen to us. Valikorlia AND Delteria are back up, no? Revitalization of dead playerworlds has been exempted for two playerworlds, it should be exempted for every playerworld.

zell12 · #10 06-07-2002, 02:54 AM

As much as I don't like you are EL, I have to agree... its only fair.

SavantMiles · #11 06-07-2002, 03:00 AM

i asked pysker about val, he said stefan did it not him, psyker emailed him about the playerworld resubmission rule but stefan never replied. i dont know about delteria though, the server sucks it should be burned

haunter · #12 06-07-2002, 03:00 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Torankusu
Disturbed Limit was not affiliated with Elven Lands other than him playing on the server.

I just want it to be reviewed without bias. So what, it's a playerworld that was shut down because the owner was not where he was and Stefan did not listen to us. Valikorlia AND Delteria are back up, no? Revitalization of dead playerworlds has been exempted for two playerworlds, it should be exempted for every playerworld.

Uh-uh... The rule was made AFTER those PWs were either revived, or were in the process of doing so

SinNetherwind · #13 06-07-2002, 03:02 AM

Okilian · #14 06-07-2002, 03:09 AM

EL was ok in the beginning..then just kinda went downhill....i say keep it down

Torankusu · #15 06-07-2002, 03:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SavantMiles
i asked pysker about val, he said stefan did it not him, psyker emailed him about the playerworld resubmission rule but stefan never replied. i dont know about delteria though, the server sucks it should be burned

Stefan is the head hancho.

Torankusu · #16 06-07-2002, 03:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by haunter

Uh-uh... The rule was made AFTER those PWs were either revived, or were in the process of doing so

Actually, the rule had existed when Playerworld Management was around and Vincent was admin. Stefan ignored it and made it oblivious, as far as I am concerned.

Milkdude99 · #17 06-07-2002, 04:02 AM

Something you guys missed here because it is on the PW Managers Forum and not posted on the main forum, All up and coming PWs will not only be judged on content , levels etc... The Manager will be reviewed and judged and a PW may be failed because of a Manager and not because of the PW itself.

Pith · #18 06-07-2002, 04:08 AM

yes it should

Milkdude99 · #19 06-07-2002, 04:28 AM

Quote:

Given that a certain degree of responsibility is required to manage a playerworld, all new owners will need to be reviewed and approved by Playerworld Administration in order to get their playerworld online, even if the playerworld itself has alredy passed. Also note that all new playerworlds will need to be reviewed by the entire review team, for a playerworld to reach Playerworld Administration for a final review, it must pass every reviewed, any single fail will deny the playerworld from even getting to Playerworld Administration.

Once again, constructive comments are welcome.

Urizen

__________________
Asst. Playerworld Administrator (Playerworld Administration)

Here is a part of that post..

Torankusu · #20 06-07-2002, 04:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Milkdude99

Here is a part of that post..

The new system is foolish.

How about.. the majority? Three passes and one fail, that's not real fair, is it? They all have different tastes.

konidias · #21 06-07-2002, 04:42 AM

I personally don't want to see old pw's revived.. I would rather see a new playerworld that is 100% classic.

Torankusu · #22 06-07-2002, 04:56 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by konidias
I personally don't want to see old pw's revived.. I would rather see a new playerworld that is 100% classic.

98% seems fine.

Frolic_RC2 · #23 06-07-2002, 04:59 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by konidias
I personally don't want to see old pw's revived.. I would rather see a new playerworld that is 100% classic.

Yeah same with me.

brock128 · #24 06-07-2002, 05:06 AM

Hey, if they updated EL with more quests and stuff, then it would be better.

Torankusu · #25 06-07-2002, 05:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by brock128
Hey, if they updated EL with more quests and stuff, then it would be better.

Would you mind deleting this thread? This poll is not exactly the kind I would've posted.

ckb1985 · #26 06-07-2002, 09:42 AM

Hey I remember when El ownd all other servers I even worked there with a few updates it could own agian. I would definatly go back to EL given the oportunity. El was huge and was lots of fun I say bring it back

TrueHeaT · #27 06-07-2002, 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by brock128
But the admins and the PW reviewers don't want to see classic servers succeed.

OH GOD. Elven Lands is not "classic" in ANY WAY besides the fact that it is old.

Torankusu · #28 06-07-2002, 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TrueHeaT

OH GOD. Elven Lands is not "classic" in ANY WAY besides the fact that it is old.

Oh, what is classic supposed to mean?
Antique does not sound right.

TrueHeaT · #29 06-07-2002, 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Torankusu
Oh, what is classic supposed to mean?
Antique does not sound right.

I was under the impression classic meant... Umm.. Well, I'd say classic.. but what I mean is... something that was excellent, really good in its day. Like Mario 3. There are bad NES games, which are old, but bad. And therefor they are not considered classics.

Tyhm · #30 06-07-2002, 12:33 PM

The definition as I've heard it is a style of server without NPCServ (more like Graal Classic than G2K1).

But you hate Classic, so I'm sure you'll be fine with lumping other bad servers in that category. :-P

mastervampire · #31 06-07-2002, 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by TrueHeaT

I was under the impression classic meant... Umm.. Well, I'd say classic.. but what I mean is... something that was excellent, really good in its day. Like Mario 3. There are bad NES games, which are old, but bad. And therefor they are not considered classics.

You have one sided views, so you should stfu. EL was a classic, it owned all other playerworlds in it's time, it's not our fault stefan didn't pick up on the fact that HEYhost is a stupid fool who can't manage his own life, let alone a PW. He should have picked up on this, from the millions of emails, PM's and whathaveyou. Then put a new person in charge. Now that's not hard is it?

-Brett

brock128 · #32 06-08-2002, 04:43 AM

I don't people even know what EL is... It's not just like N-pulse. From what I hear, it's the BEST SERVER EVER.

But of course, I've never seen it, so I want it to go back up out of pure curiousity of what it is.

Carl_Elven · #33 06-08-2002, 01:21 PM

Well if it gets put back up, I think it'd get tons of people there. That is IF it isn't screwed up like it was when HEYhost kept messing everything up or when something happened he was never around. I was the one who always bailed that server out cause he was never there for the server. I always was there to get it back up when people would screw it over and get it taken down. You would think HEYhost would have done that since he was owner, but no. He never did. If the server is under good ownership, I think it'd do very well. But that is if it has a good owner who will always be there to fix stuff, unlike HEYhost ><. But if it gets put back up, I know where to get all the old elven levels. But I think if given a chance, EL will do very well. But people have to give it a chance. If you give it a chance, let it prove it's self worthy of staying up. That's all. If it does crappy then let it get taken down. But you should really just give it a try and see what happens. I think it would do good, but that's me. Anyways, that's all I have to say.

Carl_Elven · #34 06-08-2002, 01:25 PM

I agree with Brett. If it wasn't for HEYhost, EL would most likely be around still. But he screwed it all to hell by letting people put up stuff from 2k1 up >< Didn't help when I tried to warn HEYhost about Sov abusing his power and giving stuff to people that he shouldn't be giving out

Torankusu · #35 06-08-2002, 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Carl_Elven
Well if it gets put back up, I think it'd get tons of people there. That is IF it isn't screwed up like it was when HEYhost kept messing everything up or when something happened he was never around. I was the one who always bailed that server out cause he was never there for the server. I always was there to get it back up when people would screw it over and get it taken down. You would think HEYhost would have done that since he was owner, but no. He never did. If the server is under good ownership, I think it'd do very well. But that is if it has a good owner who will always be there to fix stuff, unlike HEYhost ><. But if it gets put back up, I know where to get all the old elven levels. But I think if given a chance, EL will do very well. But people have to give it a chance. If you give it a chance, let it prove it's self worthy of staying up. That's all. If it does crappy then let it get taken down. But you should really just give it a try and see what happens. I think it would do good, but that's me. Anyways, that's all I have to say.

You should give Hack some gratitude, considering he had FTP to upload older levels, etc, etc.

mastervampire · #36 06-08-2002, 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Carl_Elven
I agree with Brett. If it wasn't for HEYhost, EL would most likely be around still. But he screwed it all to hell by letting people put up stuff from 2k1 up >< Didn't help when I tried to warn HEYhost about Sov abusing his power and giving stuff to people that he shouldn't be giving out

I remember Sovereign. He wouldn't have ever came to Elven Lands if it wasn't for me, and when he worked his way up to Server Admin and had all that power, he became the most corrupt bastard around.

-Brett

View Poll Results: Should Elven Lands be put back up?
YES! I like classics!	13	38.24%
No. I don't want it.	21	61.76%
Voters: 34. You may not vote on this poll