A warning video.

[Crow]

Originally Posted by NicoX

Well I think PR is a mix of FAQ + GP ?

I can't see how a GP member would require the stealth tool, either. There are ways which are better suited for keeping track of player activity.

[NicoX]

Originally Posted by Crow

I can't see how a GP member would require the stealth tool, either. There are ways which are better suited for keeping track of player activity.

There is indeed, chat logger, storing them for maybe 2-3 months only and so on. To prevent big storages. So if a player reports someone for cussing, looking at the logs and punish. No stealth

[-HateD-]

Originally Posted by NicoX

There is indeed, chat logger, storing them for maybe 2-3 months only and so on. To prevent big storages. So if a player reports someone for cussing, looking at the logs and punish. No stealth

Even though swearing isn't illegal on era. If you disable the swear filter you have to accept the terms that people will swear and that you can't cry about it. Therefore any ban due to the use of the "n word" or other "harassing words" is invalid. Why see hate when you can just see a wall of stars coming your way? That's why I play with swear filter on strong.

[WillaWonka]

Originally Posted by NicoX

There is indeed, chat logger, storing them for maybe 2-3 months only and so on. To prevent big storages. So if a player reports someone for cussing, looking at the logs and punish. No stealth

Never saw a chat logger while I was PR

That would most likely cause alot of lag, since so many people tend to talk, and the addition of the typerwriter, would log every letter spelled out. So we will have this large file that no one wants to sift through.

So yah, never saw a chat logger. There weren't even PM loggers, as far as mass messages go.

[cbk1994]

Originally Posted by -HateD-

Therefore any ban due to the use of the "n word" or other "harassing words" is invalid.

This was never the intention of the optional swear filter, and I doubt that's the current rule. Harassment is still against both the Graal ToS and Era's rules (unless they've changed them to permit harassment, which I doubt).

Originally Posted by WillaWonka

That would most likely cause alot of lag, since so many people tend to talk, and the addition of the typerwriter, would log every letter spelled out. So we will have this large file that no one wants to sift through.

So yah, never saw a chat logger. There weren't even PM loggers, as far as mass messages go.

You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about and should stop talking. Not only are there chat loggers on Era (which cause no lag, why would you even think they would...?), but mass messages are also logged. For a while they even logged everybody's chat routinely, although they'd stopped doing that by the time I left.

[WillaWonka]

Originally Posted by cbk1994

You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about and should stop talking. Not only are there chat loggers on Era (which cause no lag, why would you even think they would...?), but mass messages are also logged. For a while they even logged everybody's chat routinely, although they'd stopped doing that by the time I left.

Ya, I said that they didn't log messages, as far as mass messages go, as in, mass messages were the only things being logged, as far as logging messages go.

And when i had opened up the files system in the RC, it would proceed with a 20 second lag before finally opening up, and it seemed it had affected other players also at times. So when i say lag, that's what i mean, there will be more things to load, so if i were to try and open the log history it would be a damn long time, at least just for me, to get everything loaded.

Just like when you try and download and open up some other player's files with a ton of stuff on it, it takes a long time to complete the process.

[-HateD-]

Originally Posted by cbk1994

This was never the intention of the optional swear filter, and I doubt that's the current rule. Harassment is still against both the Graal ToS and Era's rules (unless they've changed them to permit harassment, which I doubt).

If that's not the intention then why have the disclaimer that kind of says "you're turning this off don't qq if someone says **** you"?
I can say the n word and not harass anyone. Not a very hard thing to do honestly.