Discussion of new playerworld rules

[fowlplay4]

Originally Posted by cbk1994

What other way are websites using to store passwords in unrecoverable form? o.o

The current "Passwords stored on the websites or databases should be hashed using cryptographically strong hash functions." is too technical, unless you've dabbled in development or have read about it that line won't mean anything.

[cbk1994]

Originally Posted by fowlplay4

The current "Passwords stored on the websites or databases should be hashed using cryptographically strong hash functions." is too technical, unless you've dabbled in development or have read about it that line won't mean anything.

I would hope the people I'm giving my password to have dabbled in web development enough to know what hashing is.

[Crono]

Originally Posted by cbk1994

I would hope the people I'm giving my password to have dabbled in web development enough to know what hashing is.

i hope they haven't, so they can see my totally awesome and inappropriate site specific passwords .

Originally Posted by fowlplay4

It was never about "legal issues" or that crap.

The original wording of the new rule discouraged people from creating/having external communities, and that in order for your community to be allowed you had to moderated in a similar fashion to the Graal forums/services.

Upon reading the original rule my response was "You want me to moderate my forums like this place otherwise I can't display it in-game? **** off." Which clearly wasn't your intention with the rule.

Pretty much what I thought but the clarification helped get rid of this image.