Any chance...

KrimsonSky · #1 08-12-2010, 03:04 PM

..of bringing /partyaddally back ?

I wouldn't even mind if it was a 1 ally limit, I miss that function.

papajchris · #2 08-12-2010, 04:54 PM

The reason for it being removed as i recall was that parties were allying up and practicably turning into gangs. Even one ally party makes you a gang as if you had both parties on you would have more members on than a gang averagely does

Supaman771 · #3 08-12-2010, 05:02 PM

But you need a free oped gun and at least a 2 level no-pk base with speaker and hat grabbers to be a gang.

KrimsonSky · #4 08-12-2010, 06:17 PM

So what, being Gold [i.e paying for Graal], you should get the full experience.

If that means getting blown off by Gangs, and you want to have some party's with friends, so what ?

Clearly if you're party + allys are better then the gang itself, then that should push Gang leaders to recruit more members, more members more points more fun.

Not enough kids are on gang tags anyways.

Frankie · #5 08-12-2010, 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KrimsonSky

So what, being Gold [i.e paying for Graal], you should get the full experience.

that's your argument? really? :P

salesman · #6 08-12-2010, 07:21 PM

The idea was to limit parties so people would be more inclined join gangs. There wasn't much to separate a gang from a party at that time, and people were just allying parties instead of joining gangs -- which wasn't the purpose of parties.

There's a few new perks that gangs have over parties now, so I guess it could be cool to re-add allying. I'd say limit the number of allies to one or two though.

DDynasty · #7 08-12-2010, 09:18 PM

It's a good idea but also make it so if a party is already allied noone else can ally them

Spikedude · #8 08-14-2010, 07:23 PM

Instead of bringing back allied parties, why not just make the party limit bigger?

LordSquirt · #9 08-14-2010, 07:35 PM

why not join a gang together

Nataxo · #10 08-14-2010, 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by papajchris

The reason for it being removed as i recall was that parties were allying up and practicably turning into gangs. Even one ally party makes you a gang as if you had both parties on you would have more members on than a gang averagely does

Everything should be like that IMO.

Andre2006 · #11 08-15-2010, 04:30 PM

Bring forward the idea to purchase "gangs" already and remove parties. We want to purchase our own "gangs"

or parties or whatever they were.

KrimsonSky · #12 08-15-2010, 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spikedude

Instead of bringing back allied parties, why not just make the party limit bigger?

Because 2 party names is better then 1.

KrimsonSky · #13 08-15-2010, 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andre2006

Bring forward the idea to purchase "gangs" already and remove parties. We want to purchase our own "gangs"

or parties or whatever they were.

That is a great idea, but then the Gang Admin would have to do a decent amount of work, and you know how this story goes :[

cbk1994 · #14 08-15-2010, 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KrimsonSky

That is a great idea, but then the Gang Admin would have to do a decent amount of work, and you know how this story goes :[

The whole idea behind it is that the gang admin would have to do 0 work and everything is run by players

KrimsonSky · #15 08-15-2010, 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbk1994

The whole idea behind it is that the gang admin would have to do 0 work and everything is run by players

But players can't run stuff remember, all bout them NPCs, gg.

cbk1994 · #16 08-15-2010, 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KrimsonSky

But players can't run stuff remember, all bout them NPCs, gg.

You seem to be contradicting yourself ...?

KrimsonSky · #17 08-15-2010, 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbk1994

You seem to be contradicting yourself ...?

/sarcasm

run41 · #18 08-16-2010, 04:04 AM

Krims right.
Btw, im almost back dude!
Iloveyouboyfrieeend <3

jkldogg · #19 08-16-2010, 05:55 AM

So what had happened was.......
killaz (ya i kno we own) and like 6 other parties allied up and took over BH for like 20 minutes so Frankie cried and took off party allying cuz he said something like

"wow this is stupid, whoever made party allying is retared. parties shouldn't be able to overrun gang bases."

???
Why don't you make the gangs better or stronger in some way? Not my fault they get owned. o.o

EDIT: Krim sell me your Purple Noland on Era like 15k?

Frankie · #20 08-16-2010, 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jkldogg

So what had happened was.......
killaz (ya i kno we own) and like 6 other parties allied up and took over BH for like 20 minutes so Frankie cried and took off party allying cuz he said something like

"wow this is stupid, whoever made party allying is retared. parties shouldn't be able to overrun gang bases."

???
Why don't you make the gangs better or stronger in some way? Not my fault they get owned. o.o

EDIT: Krim sell me your Purple Noland on Era like 15k?

okay, so if I could go back in time, I would have totally just made people in gangs to 3 times the damage to people in parties. there, problem solved. I'm sure you would have been a happy camper. shut up.

cbk1994 · #21 08-16-2010, 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie

okay, so if I could go back in time, I would have totally just made people in gangs to 3 times the damage to people in parties. there, problem solved. I'm sure you would have been a happy camper. shut up.

you'd probably still get owned
ctrl v

maximus_asinus · #22 08-16-2010, 07:25 AM

Why not remove gangs and expand the party system, it sounds like it would have more potential. Build parties like a guild/gang. Allow players to partner up, and if their party reaches a certain threshold it becomes a gang (activity, party size, etc) and have it lose gang status once it starts to fail requirements. Parties can absorb other parties if the leader of the other party accepts. You cannot be in a party if you're already in a party already (to keep from multiguilding).

Fulg0reSama · #23 08-16-2010, 07:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maximus_asinus

Why not remove gangs and expand the party system, it sounds like it would have more potential. Build parties like a guild/gang. Allow players to partner up, and if their party reaches a certain threshold it becomes a gang (activity, party size, etc) and have it lose gang status once it starts to fail requirements. Parties can absorb other parties if the leader of the other party accepts. You cannot be in a party if you're already in a party already (to keep from multiguilding).

I support this idea.

jkldogg · #24 08-16-2010, 08:23 AM

@ max sales was gonna do that...when he resigned the idea died
@ frankie.....QQ more? umad

ya i support ur idea max

xTcDiabloxTc · #25 08-16-2010, 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maximus_asinus

Why not remove gangs and expand the party system, it sounds like it would have more potential. Build parties like a guild/gang. Allow players to partner up, and if their party reaches a certain threshold it becomes a gang (activity, party size, etc) and have it lose gang status once it starts to fail requirements. Parties can absorb other parties if the leader of the other party accepts. You cannot be in a party if you're already in a party already (to keep from multiguilding).

Similar Idea to what I've been working on. Would post full details but I'd rather work out the kinks first. And of course, I don't like being quoted on it when things can still change

.

jkldogg · #26 08-16-2010, 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xTcDiabloxTc

Similar Idea to what I've been working on. Would post full details but I'd rather work out the kinks first. And of course, I don't like being quoted on it when things can still change

.

no secrets :[

xTcDiabloxTc · #27 08-16-2010, 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jkldogg

no secrets :[

I'm not trying to keep secrets, It'll be unveiled when it's ready for the public eye. I'd prefer to make an announcement when I have it all prepared.

Frankie · #28 08-16-2010, 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jkldogg

@ frankie.....QQ more? umad

you're the one *****ing about it bro.

Venom_Fish · #29 08-16-2010, 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xTcDiabloxTc

Similar Idea to what I've been working on. Would post full details but I'd rather work out the kinks first. And of course, I don't like being quoted on it when things can still change

.

Thats very original of you. You're a creative fellow, no one ever thought of that =o!

KrimsonSky · #30 08-16-2010, 06:13 PM

Hmm,

Reset the gangs,
Expand the party system's capabilities,
Let rich people purchase gangs.

but i know, LAT's will actually have to make more bases.../shocked this would be a nightmare ,
even though I'd offer to make bases in my sleep.

Supaman771 · #31 08-16-2010, 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KrimsonSky

Hmm,
but i know, LAT's will actually have to make more bases.../shocked this would be a nightmare ,
even though I'd offer to make bases in my sleep.

Nah, they rehired Tim/Rachel.
Bases were done before you even posted.

Venom_Fish · #32 08-16-2010, 06:38 PM

Dargaro is a good add, but if his work pace is anything like kinetaro's. Our reset won't happen until the end of Obama's second term.

Supaman771 · #33 08-16-2010, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Venom_Fish

Dargaro is a good add, but if his work pace is anything like kinetaro's. Our reset won't happen until the end of Obama's second term.

What if he doesn't get a second term?

Venom_Fish · #34 08-16-2010, 06:42 PM