Quote:
Originally Posted by cbk1994
I don't mind that you want to focus on UN, but don't try to pin it on Era. Your staff and players were muting, renicking, and banning players for a joke, not to mention returning the exact same insults over masses and in-game chat.
|
Sorry that the GP's couldnt notice 3 or 4 people (who didnt have their nicks set to "UN SUCKS") out of the 20-30 massing. UN players massed in retaliation.
Quote:
|
I also don't blame you in particular; I know that almost all of the overreactions were carried about by staff simply caught up in the heat of the moment, but that's no reason to continue some crusade in making Era look like an enemy, especially when it was only a minority of Era's players breaking any rules or conduct codes.
|
How was that a minority? I practically saw half of the active players doing so, and you were egging them on.
Quote:
|
Graal is a game, lighten up a bit.
|
Yeah it is a game, but it doesn't mean you should disrupt another server for fun and games.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlieM
tbh, I was the one getting players to mass it wasn't the administration, I'm not even staff on era unless you count ET. The administration got them on era sure, but I'm the one who got them to spam, for some reason UN thought it was Squirt and banned him..Streety just accept the challenge, its good PR for both servers, both should be mature about it from now on but seriously..
|
It was the fact that Chris and squirt encouraged this matter, which happened to turn out completely immature. If UN wanted to challenge Era, a thread or even possible conversation with UN staff could of been more appropriate. I don't think Streety was being a wuss at all when he declined.
If it was up to me, I would have Era Administration reviewed on server diplomacy.
02-25-2010, 02:57 AM
Hybrid Mode
