I'm a realist, not a pessimist nor an optimist. I say it like it is.
Great, we finally have an update.
Shame, its as insignificant as this.
Ex. You changed the rev time from 3 to 2 minutes. Wow, I am so greatful? o.O? Get real.
Anyways, my grammar is flawless, still fine even though its hard to type on cell phone for me. Your comprehension skills are normally shrail, so go figure.
I said, a private system would've worked more than well to assist the publicized one. The problem with the private system was updates, you weren't around when the business prospered over all others. The last two weeks, didn't you have me banned? Era was dry, our prices were way over the bar and etc? No wonder it only made 5,000$ in the system. I personally saw 7,000 more from raid contracts upon my return. Do your homework, Jr.
You said something about PPA's lack of business being relative to Bounty Hunter's, roflmao. You must not pay attention to Era, when you paid Bounty Hunter to take care of a gang, it was an extermination.
If you have a bug problem, who'd you hire? Exterminators or your uncle from down the street who has 5 cans of Raid and a hockey mask? lol.
Our prices for raiding were much higher than PPA, and everyone understood why and more than often selected us over them without it being systematic. We always made more money than PPA, thats a given. You counted our money when I wasn't around, system was glitched / bugged and etc and expect those numbers to mean much?
I'm not being self-centered, originally when you pmed me about this system, the plan was for it to co-exist with us. So don't give me that maneur.
People won't keep placing bounties to be randomly collected, and you'll within no time run out of the tax money gotten from the few cheap bounties placed. Keeping the business would've been a continuous supply.
If its no different, as you say... then deleting the business was not necessary, it would've done no harm like I said, and would've done nothing but assist your new system.
About PPA, same could be said of them. Majority of the time, that is the case, accept a contract and don't attend to it.
Also, you could easily have the player be able to cancel the contract if he's not being protected. And the payment be for however long the contract lasted, o.O? Right there, its controlled.
No one wants to anonymously place bounties, keeping the business would have given them full knowledge of who's taking care of it along with an idea of their efficiency. In other words, give them faith that their money is not being misplaced.
You're concerned about it being too exclusive? Well have the top public hunters go against the private ones for the business? That'd keep the control rotating. |