Quarter 2 Update!

[kia345]

Originally Posted by xnervNATx

why should i pay 24$ for gold to play a server that has only 15-20 players daily

If you're not willing to pay for it, then why the hell are you complaining about it?

[xnervNATx]

i would if there was more players on it

[kia345]

Originally Posted by xnervNATx

i would if there was more players on it

I'm assuming you play Classic, so you can't honestly believe amount of players is a selling point

[xnervNATx]

Originally Posted by kia345

I'm assuming you play Classic, so you can't honestly believe amount of players is a selling point

most of the time im idling on it , so i wouldnt consider this "playing"

[CharlieM]

Originally Posted by Raelyn

Lol, cheapo, it's only like 24EU to go gold. Cry more, maybe mommy and daddy will let you borrow the debit card.

The other day it was 48euro for 18 months

[xnervNATx]

Originally Posted by CharlieM

The other day it was 48euro for 18 months

that even worst

[Crono]

Originally Posted by kia345

I'm assuming you play Classic, so you can't honestly believe amount of players is a selling point

Classic can be fully enjoyed with only 8 players on, GK can't.

[MajinDragon]

To Raelyn: Learn to use edit
And GK's pretty expensive considering the playercount, detail, amount of dev and comparing it to other, similar games...

I wonder how many updates we'll see in these next few days.

[Raelyn]

Originally Posted by MajinDragon

To Raelyn: Learn to use edit
And GK's pretty expensive considering the playercount, detail, amount of dev and comparing it to other, similar games...

I wonder how many updates we'll see in these next few days.

To Majin, learn to use thread formats aside from Linear.

[Raelyn]

Originally Posted by xnervNATx

why should i pay 24$ for gold to play a server that has only 15-20 players daily

It's not like you are paying 24 EU a day, 24 EU gets you what? 2100 gelats? Which is something like 6 months of play time? You can't honestly be THAT cheap..

And as far as 15-20 players active, that's because it's a niche server, not everyone is going to like it, I mean, GK is based off of the open source rogue-like "Crossfire" which has ONE active server with MAYBE 5 people on a day total. So, some could argue it's a vast improvement. Another attempt at using this code was Daimonin, which again, has all of 5 people playing it. GK has something neither of those do, which is action-based combat. (Albeit it lacks many of the better features of it's counterparts)

Besides, even if you don't think it's fair to have to pay to play GK, consider this, every so many months, you're giving Stefan and Unix 24 EU.. if for no other reason than you DO use their product, even on trial. You obviously like it enough to play on a trial account, right? Support them for bringing you this game. 24 EU is not a lot of money, and if it gets you 3-6 months of gameplay, that's only 24 EU that works out to 8-16 EU a month, suspecting Unix and Stefan split profits 50/50, that's 4-8 EU a month. That's a pathetic income in itself. So they rely on many subscriptions per month, or are forced to find other ways to support their families and homes, leaving them less time to develop graal.

So if everyone thought like you, they would get less renewals per month, less money, and have less time to be able to devote to graal.

For the love of graal, and if you want it to grow more, actually SUPPORT it financially, or GTFO and quit leeching on a trial account.

[Tigairius]

Originally Posted by Crono

Classic can be fully enjoyed with only 8 players on, GK can't.

That's really just a matter of opinion. I disagree, in fact, I feel quite the opposite. I feel that Classic can't be enjoyed with only 8 players while GK can. Not saying that GK wouldn't be better with more players though, I can definitely agree with that.

[xnervNATx]

Originally Posted by Tigairius

That's really just a matter of opinion. I disagree, in fact, I feel quite the opposite. I feel that Classic can't be enjoyed with only 8 players while GK can.

classic can be enjoyed with only 8 players. gk cant .

and to raelyn

that the main reason why i dont pay i because trial do not have enought right to enjoy that server then pay to continu to play it.

[Ravenblade1979]

@Raelyn: i do agree with you somewhat but you have to understand that if they wanted to rake in the cash they could go for a montly renewal and they chose not too so thats telling me already that they have other jobs and are still doing this. To be honest, as must as i like this game its $50 for me for a year. I just don't have that much to spare.

@xnervNATx: Trial is supposed to tantalize you to upgrade. If they gave trials more freedom then it would turn into zone where people don't upgrade. When I first started out it was on trial island and I played through it as a trial and by the time I was done I was so thirsty to see the rest of the game that I payed for a gold membership.

It does have its perks and you have to be willing to pay that extra to find them out. Otherwise you will never get the full enjoyment out of the server that you want.

[Tigairius]

Originally Posted by xnervNATx

that the main reason why i dont pay i because trial do not have enought right to enjoy that server then pay to continu to play it.

As far as trials go, we're actually working on making the server more trial-friendly, even if the recent trial updates may make it appear otherwise.

[WanDaMan]

Very nice updates, keep up the great work guys!

Originally Posted by Nature2

in a few weeks (when bugs are fixed) i will give awards to the kingdoms. It will be like "Kingdom of the month" "Kingdom of the year".

I'd love for you to explore more with these and not only have the awards for kingdoms but also for individual players as an incentive towards people for playing the event such as "Most played player" or "Least amount of deaths" etc.