Graal Forums  

Go Back   Graal Forums > PlayerWorlds > Classic Main Forum
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 03-09-2009, 12:54 AM
Bell Bell is offline
Registered User
Bell's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,824
Bell has much to be proud ofBell has much to be proud ofBell has much to be proud ofBell has much to be proud ofBell has much to be proud ofBell has much to be proud ofBell has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terazel Tenjin View Post
So just to clarify here. The next higher overriding authority to initiate a change in management for the server would be PWA. And that's not going to happen because PWA is acknowledging that everything is fine and dandy with the server, and that the current management is sufficient? Despite all of the player input stating otherwise?

Sure, it's not a democracy nor a tyranny since neither condition is stated in stone to be the status quo, but the facts have to be faced sooner or later. The problems are recognized and stated, the next step is remediation. What's the remediation? The answer from management has been too broad, and as stated by the current Manager himself, he's seeing the input here as a list of problems to remedy but it's a two-way street. Players should have their say and be let in on the overall plan for remediation so they know what to expect.

The biggest problem is that this isn't something that just cropped up.
I have never said everything is fine and dandy. I have just been around long enough to know that simply replacing the manager is not going to solve the problem. I have also listened to the players and read these forums. For many years actually, long before I was a PWA.

Many of you either individually or in groups have for the most part had an ulterior motive for your demands as to who should replace Storm and or Thor. Some of you in the past and present have even been perfectly willing to lie in order to attain those motives. Some of you are just sheep agreeing with what someone else wants so you can be included in the conversation. I honestly don't think that any of you understand how destructive a rash decision on a management change can be to a server.

I fully expect someone to now say that anything is better than what we have now but are you sure about that? Would Classic being non existent be preferable to what there is now? Would going invisible and spending the next 2 or 3 years also be preferable?

Maybe you should all rethink your motives, stop dwelling on the past and come up with some constructive suggestions that could truly turn Classic around. Rome wasn't built in a day and Classic won't be either. From what I've seen and been informed of. Those that actually have good suggestions, have been saying them privately so they don't become involved in the flame wars themselves.
__________________
For support contact
http://support.toonslab.com/
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 05:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.