So we got ourselves an island...

[ViperZakuto]

"hard" is a bad choice of words... Long and boring is the correct termonology. The monsters need to put up a fight. not just get hit 0-3's from the strongest monsters in the game.

[Googi]

Originally Posted by ViperZakuto

that statement is untrue. how many people keep training there stuff after about lvl 40. I don't see but a handful of people that actually play anymore get to lvl 40. people stop training because it's too much, and too boring. The people still play because of the people, items, and they like to be "powerful". They just stop training.

So if the max level was set to 50 (very difficult to get but obtainable), more people would train their magic, wisdom and physical to level 50?

Originally Posted by ViperZakuto

A lot of my friends won't play because they can't lvl high enough. They play WoW and runescape... Games where the max lvl is obtainable. They said they would play if it had more monsters... and higher lvls.

I find this claim pretty suspect, because I've gone around to other servers and asked a lot of people about why they don't/won't play 2K2, and not once have I heard this given as an answer, so at the very least it doesn't seem to be a major factor in deciding not to play.

[MajinDragon]

Originally Posted by Googi

I find this claim pretty suspect, because I've gone around to other servers and asked a lot of people about why they don't/won't play 2K2, and not once have I heard this given as an answer, so at the very least it doesn't seem to be a major factor in deciding not to play.

From those i've asked, it's the economic issues and that levelling is dull and boring, which makes them not want to play GK. The levelling curve, imo is fine, it's just that it looks awful from our view as there aren't the monsters or methods around to make the maximum level to be obtainable, without a sacrifice of ALOT of time (Like 1-2 years literally to max main stats).

[ViperZakuto]

Originally Posted by MajinDragon

From those i've asked, it's the economic issues and that levelling is dull and boring, which makes them not want to play GK. The levelling curve, imo is fine, it's just that it looks awful from our view as there aren't the monsters or methods around to make the maximum level to be obtainable, without a sacrifice of ALOT of time (Like 1-2 years literally to max main stats).

this is my point exactly.

[ViperZakuto]

Originally Posted by Googi

So if the max level was set to 50 (very difficult to get but obtainable), more people would train their magic, wisdom and physical to level 50?

Whats the point in having these lvls if there not gonna use them, or anybody can't reach them unless they abuse a bug? Answer me that.

[Googi]

Originally Posted by ViperZakuto

Whats the point in having these lvls if there not gonna use them, or anybody can't reach them unless they abuse a bug? Answer me that.

They provide some degree of security when bugs are abused, but they serve very little purpose. Removing the caps on phys/wisdom/magic wouldn't change much. The point isn't the existence of an unobtainable level cap, but rather the nonexistence of an obtainable one.

[ViperZakuto]

you just said the szame thing twice... just reworded

[Googi]

Originally Posted by ViperZakuto

you just said the szame thing twice... just reworded

They aren't the same. The existence of an unobtainable level cap denotes the nonexistence of an obtainable level cap, but the nonexistence of an obtainable level cap doesn't necessarily denote the existence of an unobtainable level cap. It can denote that there is no level cap instead.

[ViperZakuto]

I'm done arguing with you i've made my point and you should be able to get it.