Hiding Armor

splatxp · #1 09-25-2007, 11:28 AM

Could it be made so we could hide our body armor? If we can hide our helmet and cloak, by any train of logic at all, body armor should be hideable as well.

If a cape can be hidden, armor can be hidden much more easily by comparison, seeing as you could wear it under your clothing.

Is this reasonable? Platemail of Power is ugly. Thanks for listening!

sango_ku · #2 09-25-2007, 05:33 PM

yea hide chest armor ! its so ugly except for black mail

Ravenblade1979 · #3 09-25-2007, 05:46 PM

why not just ask to be able to hide all...sheesh.

Felix_Xenophobe · #4 09-25-2007, 06:07 PM

No. If you would be able to hide even more armor it would be like when people glitched everything invisible and that sucked monkey-nuts.

splatxp · #5 09-25-2007, 08:03 PM

Why are we allowed to have invisible cloaks and helmets if we can't even hide armor under our clothing?

If your reasons for being against hiding body armor are "No then too much stuff will be invisible!" then doesn't it make sense for body armor to take priority over the others?

Why can we hide helmets at all?

Tigairius · #6 09-25-2007, 10:02 PM

I think I'd have to agree here, we shouldn't be able to hide body armor. I think they went overboard when they made it to where you can hide masks... x-x

cyan3 · #7 09-25-2007, 11:37 PM

Once cloaks didin't have a gfx so it's logiciel to hide them because some people didin't like the look of the cloak gfx, i don't know the reason for the helmet i guess so people can use hair. But with armour i see no logiciel reason to hide it.

kia345 · #8 09-26-2007, 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyan3

But with armour i see no logiciel reason to hide it.

It's ugly?

cyan3 · #9 09-26-2007, 12:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kia345

It's ugly?

Just don't use it then only equip it in battle. I think all the older player will agree with me that it does not matter how alchemy armour looks they are made for stats, when you didin't have the option to hide helmets people still used the Full Helmet of Might even if they didin't like the gfx for it.

sango_ku · #10 09-26-2007, 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyan3

Just don't use it then only equip it in battle. I think all the older player will agree with me that it does not matter how alchemy armour looks they are made for stats, when you didin't have the option to hide helments people still used the Full Helmet of Might even if they didin't like the gfx for it.

of course ... but its better if you were all time no? its easy if you got old pmop (invisible) but its hight price ! xD

cyan3 · #11 09-26-2007, 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sango_ku

of course ... but its better if you were all time no? its easy if you got old pmop (invisible) but its hight price ! xD

When i didin't have the option to hide my helmet i still had it on and when i had my plate mail of power i still used it and didin't care how it looked i used it for the stats nothing else.

kia345 · #12 09-26-2007, 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyan3

Just don't use it then only equip it in battle. I think all the older player will agree with me that it does not matter how alchemy armour looks they are made for stats, when you didin't have the option to hide helmets people still used the Full Helmet of Might even if they didin't like the gfx for it.

Well if we can hide that ugly helmets, the ugly masks, and the ugly cloaks, why can't we hide the ugly armor? Oddly enough the other things we can hide have stats too, how is armor different?