Graal Forums

Graal Forums (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/index.php)
-   GK Suggestions (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=39)
-   -   Hiding Armor (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=76921)

splatxp 09-25-2007 11:28 AM

Hiding Armor
 
Could it be made so we could hide our body armor? If we can hide our helmet and cloak, by any train of logic at all, body armor should be hideable as well.

If a cape can be hidden, armor can be hidden much more easily by comparison, seeing as you could wear it under your clothing.

Is this reasonable? Platemail of Power is ugly. Thanks for listening!

sango_ku 09-25-2007 05:33 PM

yea hide chest armor ! its so ugly except for black mail :)

Ravenblade1979 09-25-2007 05:46 PM

why not just ask to be able to hide all...sheesh.

Felix_Xenophobe 09-25-2007 06:07 PM

No. If you would be able to hide even more armor it would be like when people glitched everything invisible and that sucked monkey-nuts.

splatxp 09-25-2007 08:03 PM

Why are we allowed to have invisible cloaks and helmets if we can't even hide armor under our clothing?

If your reasons for being against hiding body armor are "No then too much stuff will be invisible!" then doesn't it make sense for body armor to take priority over the others?

Why can we hide helmets at all?

Tigairius 09-25-2007 10:02 PM

I think I'd have to agree here, we shouldn't be able to hide body armor. I think they went overboard when they made it to where you can hide masks... x-x

cyan3 09-25-2007 11:37 PM

Once cloaks didin't have a gfx so it's logiciel to hide them because some people didin't like the look of the cloak gfx, i don't know the reason for the helmet i guess so people can use hair. But with armour i see no logiciel reason to hide it.

kia345 09-26-2007 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyan3 (Post 1349550)
But with armour i see no logiciel reason to hide it.

It's ugly?

cyan3 09-26-2007 12:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kia345 (Post 1349555)
It's ugly?

Just don't use it then only equip it in battle. I think all the older player will agree with me that it does not matter how alchemy armour looks they are made for stats, when you didin't have the option to hide helmets people still used the Full Helmet of Might even if they didin't like the gfx for it.

sango_ku 09-26-2007 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyan3 (Post 1349557)
Just don't use it then only equip it in battle. I think all the older player will agree with me that it does not matter how alchemy armour looks they are made for stats, when you didin't have the option to hide helments people still used the Full Helmet of Might even if they didin't like the gfx for it.

of course ... but its better if you were all time no? its easy if you got old pmop (invisible) but its hight price ! xD

cyan3 09-26-2007 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sango_ku (Post 1349558)
of course ... but its better if you were all time no? its easy if you got old pmop (invisible) but its hight price ! xD

When i didin't have the option to hide my helmet i still had it on and when i had my plate mail of power i still used it and didin't care how it looked i used it for the stats nothing else.

kia345 09-26-2007 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyan3 (Post 1349557)
Just don't use it then only equip it in battle. I think all the older player will agree with me that it does not matter how alchemy armour looks they are made for stats, when you didin't have the option to hide helmets people still used the Full Helmet of Might even if they didin't like the gfx for it.

Well if we can hide that ugly helmets, the ugly masks, and the ugly cloaks, why can't we hide the ugly armor? Oddly enough the other things we can hide have stats too, how is armor different?


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.