Petition: For Selection of Kingdom Leaders

[Sam]

Originally Posted by schnukelmaus

I don't see how elections fix this problem, USD'ing of kingdoms, or length of time while in a king's position, and I think everybody could agree with me on that.

Yes you are right, the reason why we have the election is because of the players demand as you can see in the poll. Maybe next time the administration chose a new leader.

[schnukelmaus]

Originally Posted by Sam

Yes you are right, the reason why we have the election is because of the players demand as you can see in the poll. Maybe next time the administration chose a new leader.

players' demand?

[Sam]

Originally Posted by schnukelmaus

players' demand?

Yes and you've voted there too.

[dNeonb]

Originally Posted by schnukelmaus

That is not the fact, it is the principle of it.

Yes, it is. Everyone who wants to "buy" a kingdom now would think a few times more about it and doesn't even do it because the risk is too high that he will loos his money for nothing.

[schnukelmaus]

Originally Posted by Sam

Yes and you've voted there too.

I really don't understand where you are going with this..

Yes, it is. Everyone who wants to "buy" a kingdom now would think a few times more about it and doesn't even do it because the risk is too high that he will loos his money for nothing.

I understand what you say, Björn, BUT how often has the USD purchase of a kingdom occured that you know of? I mean.. Someone offered me $500 USD to take Samurai, but I declined the offer. Still, USD purchase can still mean A LOT of support for voters as well. Depends who has friends that are willing to do it or not. Having said that, there is no sure way to discontinue it from happening.

[dNeonb]

Originally Posted by schnukelmaus

I really don't understand where you are going with this..




I understand what you say, Björn, BUT how often has the USD purchase of a kingdom occured that you know of? I mean.. Someone offered me $500 USD to take Samurai, but I declined the offer. Still, USD purchase can still mean A LOT of support for voters as well. Depends who has friends that are willing to do it or not. Having said that, there is no sure way to discontinue it from happening.

Sure, but it's too bad that not everyone thinks that way else there wouldn't be such things like now.

[schnukelmaus]

Originally Posted by dNeonb

Sure, but it's too bad that not everyone thinks that way else there wouldn't be such things like now.

Unfortunately there is not any sure way to prevent it

[xLadyNeriahx]

I believe administration should choose the new leaders, for the main fact some players do not look at such things as Scamming, Ban History, etc. etc....(as stated by someone else earlier) Either way Im not upset, or complaining or what not.

[Sam]

Originally Posted by xLadyNeriahx

I believe administration should choose the new leaders, for the main fact some players do not look at such things as Scamming, Ban History, etc. etc....(as stated by someone else earlier) Either way Im not upset, or complaining or what not.

Normally we check all new leaders and deny their leadership if there is something not okay.

[Darklux]

The GK Staff already broken the tradition of election by resigning kings on zormite.
Than just be fair and do that everywhere, and ad something like a cup-d'etat option to kick the king if the majority of players is against the current king.
=> automatic kick and vote system, no descisions of staff or other kings