X-mas package error maybe

[SuperCornGuy]

i was looking on graalonline.com and it said on my profile, gold supscription 12 months and x-mas package

[Ibonic]

Originally Posted by SuperCornGuy

i was looking on graalonline.com and it said on my profile, gold supscription 12 months and x-mas package

The subscription history page is pulling up the current description of what you bought rather than what it was at the time you actually purchased it. This is probably because the item code (subscription identifier, or whatever you want to call it) is the same, and it only stores that in your history.

So even though you might've bought "12 months Graal Gold Subscription", it's erroneously showing that it was "packed with Xmas items" because that's what the package currently available on the web site is.


It shows an 'xmas package' in my history even in August of 2001, which is obviously not accurate. I guess it should be changed/fixed, because it can be misleading.

If you actually bought the xmas package, you should see it in your order confirmation e-mail. You could also check the details in your PayPal history if you used that method.

[p2p_Sir_Link]

Originally Posted by Ibonic

The subscription history page is pulling up the current description of what you bought rather than what it was at the time you actually purchased it. This is probably because the item code (subscription identifier, or whatever you want to call it) is the same, and it only stores that in your history.

It shows an 'xmas package' in my history even in August of 2001, which is obviously not accurate. I guess it should be changed/fixed, because it can be misleading.

If you actually bought the xmas package, you should see it in your order confirmation e-mail. You could also check the details in your PayPal history if you used that method.

Very useful information.

However, that leads to the question, can seperate IDs be used for the X-Mas packages, just to clear up any confusion like this? I'm not sure how fussy paypal would be about deactivating payment codes, but I assume this would not be too difficult to implement.