Races - Page 4

Stevsen · #46 12-07-2005, 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damix2

Yes, that is unbalancing the game, if you REALLY wanted to do that, thats why we have classes, races are just a needless add-on

Actually you might be on to something.. It could be nice if classes had stat bonuses, giving them a point.

Damix2 · #47 12-07-2005, 11:26 PM

They have a point right now, the point just doesn't last long.

Butz · #48 12-07-2005, 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stevsen

You might be right, but does it make sense to you to see a white orc?

Anyway, if it can't be races, we should atleast add orcs, elves and stuff as monsters/baddies.

No, but I've seen green orcs. Since there is an orc head out there already.

Adding new graphics for races and letting people decide on their own? Fine with me.

Adding new game mechanics to an already messed up system? No.

Stevsen · #49 12-07-2005, 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damix2

They have a point right now, the point just doesn't last long.

Well then, a lasting point.But on to the races subject.

Another easy way to create races would be simply to create the heads, hairs and bodys and then you would be able to set your race manually by using /sethead, and getting yourself the haircut you want.

The clothes could be chosen in the character creation screen. It should be like the clothe changers in zone, would make you able to get much more into your RP role from the start.

CidNight1142 · #50 12-07-2005, 11:59 PM

I mean, theoretically the race and class system for add ons and downfalls (like an elf thief would have really high dex, but very low constitution, or a human warrior might be the standard at fairly even stats). It works great in D&D and has for decades. The downfall is, it really probably would require a reset. Thus, its null.

Stevsen · #51 12-08-2005, 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CidNight1142

I mean, theoretically the race and class system for add ons and downfalls (like an elf thief would have really high dex, but very low constitution, or a human warrior might be the standard at fairly even stats). It works great in D&D and has for decades. The downfall is, it really probably would require a reset. Thus, its null.

Exactly, but someone should make a poll and see if the majority wants a reset (Thats if it hasn't been done allready of course

).

Damix2 · #52 12-08-2005, 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stevsen

Exactly, but someone should make a poll and see if the majority wants a reset (Thats if it hasn't been done allready of course

).

It has, and it doesn't matter, GK won't be reset, and it shouldn't be.

Stevsen · #53 12-08-2005, 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damix2

It has, and it doesn't matter, GK won't be reset, and it shouldn't be.

You have stated your opinion, but i still think it would do good. I have done the math and found more positive things than negative.

Googi · #54 12-08-2005, 07:45 PM

Even I think that too much stuff has been added to the game to start making new races.

Damix2 · #55 12-08-2005, 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stevsen

You have stated your opinion, but i still think it would do good. I have done the math and found more positive things than negative.

GK won't be reset is not an opinion its fact.

And if you think just a reset itself will help then you really shouldn't be posting here.

Googi · #56 12-08-2005, 09:02 PM

Like I said before, a reset is an ultimate last resort. It's something to be done when and only when your server has no players left. Until then nerfing is always a better option.

Stevsen · #57 12-08-2005, 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Googi

Like I said before, a reset is an ultimate last resort. It's something to be done when and only when your server has no players left. Until then nerfing is always a better option.

How would anyone notice if no one plays there?

And to Damix: I know, but i meant that of course it wont happen, but i just think it'll be best.

Googi · #58 12-09-2005, 12:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stevsen

How would anyone notice if no one plays there?

Because you'd announce it.

Stevsen · #59 12-09-2005, 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Googi

Because you'd announce it.

Where would you announce it if nobody checked the server? And if most of the people playing didn't check the website?

Also, if GK lost every player it had except for a few people, others would give up on it, cause in such an extreme situation people would have somehow realized it wouldn't change, and then thinking that not even a reset would help.

Damix2 · #60 12-09-2005, 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stevsen

Where would you announce it if nobody checked the server? And if most of the people playing didn't check the website?

Also, if GK lost every player it had except for a few people, others would give up on it, cause in such an extreme situation people would have somehow realized it wouldn't change, and then thinking that not even a reset would help.

You're kidding me right? People just don't log on and play, there is this crazy thing called communication, did you noitce when Era was released? idiot