Miscellaneous Kingdom Discussion

[LordZen]

Originally Posted by Nappa

I don't understand. Zormites live hundreds of years AND have more babies then humans due to they lay eggs like fish. Why are they being outpaced by humans ?

If this is the case, Nappa, then explain why the Zormite race stayed in the minority vs the human race throughout the entire history of 2k1? 10 eggs does not garauntee 10 children, either.

Originally Posted by Zurkiba

Zen, you've changed your story since then.

And what, pray tell, have I changed since then which has caused your newfound dislike for that presented line of history?

Originally Posted by Zurkiba

That's your flaw, Zormites AREN'T HUMANS!
You failed to understand the quote -_-

He is obviously refering to Zormite as a nation, not an ethnicity. But aside from that, I do not understand, you have even said yourself that humans were in Zormite in 2k1.

It really sounds to me like you are the one changing your story. This Archigos Republic idea is completely new, and you told me yourself that it was fine to call it Zormite as long as the storyline supported even only a few zormite people to still have survived. Your whole issue, a couple weeks ago, was that the zormites just disappeared and a proper acceptable explaination was never presented. Your position was previously, a Human majority in 2k2 Zormite was O.K.

[Nappa]

Originally Posted by LordZen

If this is the case, Nappa, then explain why the Zormite race stayed in the minority vs the human race throughout the entire history of 2k1? 10 eggs does not garauntee 10 children, either.

Because their was no reason to multiply their race. More people would require more people to feed, more expenses, etc.. So the people purposely didn't mate that often.

Why praytell don't humans have a baby every year in real life ? The same reasons.

However in the need of more zormites to preserve their way of life, I'm sure they would mate.

And as for humans being in Zormite and 2k1, either you read wrong or someone lied to you. We have said that their were none.

[Zurkiba]

Originally Posted by LordZen

If this is the case, Nappa, then explain why the Zormite race stayed in the minority vs the human race throughout the entire history of 2k1? 10 eggs does not garauntee 10 children, either.

With each kingdom comes an invisible kingdom. It's similiar to how Dustari continues to grow yet there may only be three females in the kingdom.

Originally Posted by LordZen

And what, pray tell, have I changed since then which has caused your newfound dislike for that presented line of history?

I dont dislike it, It could work but there are still flaws in it.

Originally Posted by LordZen

He is obviously refering to Zormite as a nation, not an ethnicity. But aside from that, I do not understand, you have even said yourself that humans were in Zormite in 2k1.

That's a negative. No Humans have been in Zormite. The closest thing was a Dustarian Governor, who didn't even get actual power.

Originally Posted by LordZen

It really sounds to me like you are the one changing your story. This Archigos Republic idea is completely new, and you told me yourself that it was fine to call it Zormite as long as the storyline supported even only a few zormite people to still have survived. Your whole issue, a couple weeks ago, was that the zormites just disappeared and a proper acceptable explaination was never presented. Your position was previously, a Human majority in 2k2 Zormite was O.K.

Granted, a few Zormits would be fine. It would actually support your storyline. But right now you have a storyline in which a person could just easily say *kills all humans with uber magic*, it has flaws.

But the fact is why in the hell would they have a second Zormite nation when it isn't really Zormite?

Last question: Why are you so intent on wanting Zormites to be human?