obj.objecttype

[Chompy]

Well.. the thread name is kinda silly.. but.. does objecttype return the parent objecttype (here being TStaticVar)?

PHP Code:

function onCreated() {
  temp.obj = new TStaticVar("TestObject");
  temp.obj.foo = "bar";
  
  temp.obj2 = new TestObject();
  
  echo(temp.obj2.objecttype());
} 


Is there a way to make it echo/return "TestObject"?

Can't seem to find a way...

[zokemon]

Don't think there is a way, nope.

[Inverness]

TestObject isn't an actual object type, just the name of the object the second TStaticVar was copied from.

[Chompy]

Originally Posted by Inverness

TestObject isn't an actual object type, just the name of the object the second TStaticVar was copied from.

But whatever I named the TStaticVar, I wouldn't get the object name of the second TStaticVar or the 'sub-object'

[Inverness]

Originally Posted by Chompy

But whatever I named the TStaticVar, I wouldn't get the object name of the second TStaticVar or the 'sub-object'

Ugh, the concept is amazingly simple you know, and I'm rather irritated at your lack of understanding about something I thought you would have known.

new Object(Name);

The object can be an existing one, in which case all editable variables will be copied including its joined classes, and the copied object will be of the same type as the original. Or if its the name of an object type, a new instance of that type will be created.

If you've ever made new GuiProfiles it would be simple to understand.

PHP Code:

function onCreated() {
  obj = new TStaticVar("TestObject");
  obj.foo = "bar";
  
  obj2 = new TestObject();
} 


PHP Code:

function onCreated() {
  obj = new TStaticVar("TestObject");
  obj.foo = "bar";
  
  obj2 = new TStaticVar();
  obj2.copyfrom(obj);
} 


Both are doing the exact same thing.

[Chompy]

Originally Posted by Inverness

Ugh, the concept is amazingly simple you know, and I'm rather irritated at your lack of understanding about something I thought you would have known.

uhm? That was just an example, because I mostly use your maketype() function :o

[Em]

Woah, Inverness I was reading this thread just out of curiosity.. And then I saw your post. I'm kind of shocked. Why are you so mean and arrogant O.o

Saying things like "amazingly simple you know".. As if he is an idiot for not understanding ?
And you're irritated by his ignorance.. ? Why should you find that irritable ? It's not affecting you in any way O.o

I've always thought you were a reasonable person... I mean common he was asking a question, not going around yelling at people. You should save you scorn for when it's appropriate.

[Inverness]

Originally Posted by Em

Woah, Inverness I was reading this thread just out of curiosity.. And then I saw your post. I'm kind of shocked. Why are you so mean and arrogant O.o

Saying things like "amazingly simple you know".. As if he is an idiot for not understanding ?
And you're irritated by his ignorance.. ? Why should you find that irritable ? It's not affecting you in any way O.o

I've always thought you were a reasonable person... I mean common he was asking a question, not going around yelling at people. You should save you scorn for when it's appropriate.

Hey, I have expectations of certain scripters. And my opinion of Chompster's scripting capability is high enough that I thought he would have known.

Originally Posted by Chompy

uhm? That was just an example, because I mostly use your maketype() function :o

Thats just creating a TStaticVar with a certain name with classes joined to it. Then that can be copied with classes included so you don't have to join them again. It also looks cool at the same time.

[Kyranki]

Originally Posted by Em

Woah, Inverness I was reading this thread just out of curiosity.. And then I saw your post. I'm kind of shocked. Why are you so mean and arrogant O.o

Saying things like "amazingly simple you know".. As if he is an idiot for not understanding ?
And you're irritated by his ignorance.. ? Why should you find that irritable ? It's not affecting you in any way O.o

I've always thought you were a reasonable person... I mean common he was asking a question, not going around yelling at people. You should save you scorn for when it's appropriate.

Well, there's a couple scripters around the scripting forums who when coming around learned alot from Inverness, those including (and probably the only) are Chompy and myself. :O

[coreys]

Originally Posted by Em

Woah, Inverness I was reading this thread just out of curiosity.. And then I saw your post. I'm kind of shocked. Why are you so mean and arrogant O.o

Saying things like "amazingly simple you know".. As if he is an idiot for not understanding ?
And you're irritated by his ignorance.. ? Why should you find that irritable ? It's not affecting you in any way O.o

I've always thought you were a reasonable person... I mean common he was asking a question, not going around yelling at people. You should save you scorn for when it's appropriate.

Originally Posted by Inverness

Hey, I have expectations of certain scripters. And my opinion of Chompster's scripting capability is high enough that I thought he would have known.

Basically he's saying it's more of a compliment.

[Chompy]

<3 Inver
<3 Stan

Hehe.. and Inver, that maketype function indeed saves time and looks cool