Since your plan here is to ignore everything that addresses why you're wrong, I'll just do the opposite and respond to you piece-by-piece.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hiro
Oh please.
|
I was exaggerating, truthfully. There's actually harsher words for you that would be more appropriate.
Quote:
This isn't wishful thinking or being optimistic.
|
It's a pipedream, but a poorly considered one.
Quote:
I'm saying every server on Graal is ****.
|
Every server on Graal is fine, it's Graal that's any number of asterisk you wish to line up.
You thinking that Unholy Nation or Zodiac or whatever isn't up to par is an extreme example of setting the bar far too high. This medium is lower than many F2P MMOs and low-key indie games. You cannot seriously expect anything great from it. Every server is top notch for what they are.
Quote:
You won't fix them. You won't make them better in some fashion.
|
The only true fixing to be done is that done to people like you, not the servers. You're treating Graal like something it's not, and will never be. This is the height of it. If you have a problem with the current servers, the issue is you. The issue is a personal one. The issue has nothing to do with quality, is has to do with you not getting what you want.
Quote:
Graal has always been one new server after the next
|
No it hasn't, it's been the same lineup for years, and a very rare occurrence like Zodiac or Era coming out on top. These niches are filled, and the small community is strung very then between a few unique servers. Sure, "new servers" come up all the time. And they're always afterthoughts, they're always temporary, they're always
not saving Graal. There's nothing to save. Stop suggesting that breaking up the tranquility because you're not the top dog on whatever server you play will somehow improve everything.
Quote:
We won't solve the larger problems at hand.
|
There's zero problems to be solved. You're not a brilliant rebel leader trying to rally Graal together for the greater good. The ones with the bright ideas are people like Thor or fp4, just trying to make their server work.
Quote:
so what can developers do?
|
HINT: It's not this:
Quote:
At least a new server would be SOMETHING to do.
|
We've had new servers. There's always new servers. Graal's only true constant is that some
idiot will always spring forth with a new server, clearly believing that it is
exactly what Graal needs, only to realize that
****, these new servers aren't actually helping anything, and then they post a goodbye thread.
It's actually developing for the existent and somewhat lacking servers. That's a cause that will actually have a positive effect.
Quote:
iGraal is popular because it's new - the accessibility is new.
|
This doesn't actually make sense.
Quote:
What has PC Graal had that is new recently of any worth? Maloria? Classic? Big ****ing deal.
|
I don't understand how your reasoning is NEW THING = THE BEST THINGS. You're given new things, you're given in-name-only revivals. Why are those not satisfying to you? (I know why - it's because they're not the product of your suggestion. You're not actually delivering a thought out attempt to improve Graal, because what you suggest happens on a regular basis and quite obviously does nothing beneficial. But you will willingly ignore this 100% rate of failure that proves your futility, because the difference here is that is wasn't your idea.)
Like, I want to delve into this point deeper, but your train of thought is literally so shallow and... almost in reverse, that I don't think it's actually possible to reason with you any more complexly than just with a blunt, "no, you're wrong, this is why". But it's clear that you can't even comprehend that point, so I'll just let you continue on your merry way. Your ideal for "fixing" Graal is bad. It's baseless, it's shallow, it's happened a million times to no avail. I've cited multiple servers that were your exact plan, these "dream team" run servers that were meant to pump life into Graal, and they've only fallen into obscurity. You yourself have referenced servers that were meant to be the "next big things", only to fail.