gangs - Page 4

salesman · #46 10-24-2010, 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by defaultaccount

Honestly man, and this is coming from someone who knew you for a long time man. I have no idea how u can even speak, little own have a say in things.

So let me get this straight. You think Wil as GBA would be a good idea? All the more reason for me to think otherwise!

defaultaccount · #47 10-24-2010, 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by salesman

So let me get this straight. You think Wil as GBA would be a good idea? All the more reason for me to think otherwise!

No, that's not the point.

What does that mean anyways, because I was never the corrupt one. Rather, I say we.

fowlplay4 · #48 10-24-2010, 08:07 PM

I think the point sales is trying to make is that he's glad Era Staff isn't taking suggestions from dumb virtual gangbangers.

defaultaccount · #49 10-24-2010, 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fowlplay4

I think the point sales is trying to make is that he's glad Era Staff isn't taking suggestions from dumb virtual gangbangers.

What? I've been for a while though. Know alot of these admins pretty well, what they did to the fudgeing server, and the original admins.

I could tell you the whole story.

fowlplay4 · #50 10-25-2010, 05:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by defaultaccount

I could tell you the whole story.

Please do but only if you make a new thread and write in essay form.

defaultaccount · #51 10-25-2010, 05:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fowlplay4

Please do but only if you make a new thread and write in essay form.

ok

Fulg0reSama · #52 10-25-2010, 05:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fowlplay4

Please do but only if you make a new thread and write in essay form.

Careful we may need google translator to figure out what he's writing.

defaultaccount · #53 10-25-2010, 05:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fulg0reSama

Careful we may need google translator to figure out what he's writing.

:[

kia345 · #54 10-25-2010, 05:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fulg0reSama

Careful we may need google translator to figure out what he's writing.

You just don't understand how complex and deep it is!

Fulg0reSama · #55 10-25-2010, 05:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kia345

You just don't understand how complex and deep it is!

Nou.

fowlplay4 · #56 10-25-2010, 05:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by defaultaccount

ok

I look forward to some new Era forum content.

defaultaccount · #57 10-25-2010, 07:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kia345

You just don't understand how complex and deep it is!

really. :blush

Sonniku4 · #58 10-25-2010, 11:27 PM

DJ Wasser sez...
ay we got sum siiiik updaetz in 2 weekz mayhaps

deathbarrier99 · #59 10-25-2010, 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sonniku4

DJ Wasser sez...
ay we got sum siiiik updaetz in 2 weekz mayhaps

There you go you babbling buffoons.

Zeross · #60 10-26-2010, 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by papajchris

I have yet to see a formal complaint from anyone about either of them in the ticket system or on here. So until I do, I will assume that you guys are angry ranting oldbies who can't accept change.

Gangs are inactive (That alone is a whole world of problems by itself, but lets just sum it up as that).

One of the leaders has been gone for lord knows how long.
The other leader spends all his time playing Events, and seldom raids or wants to.

You'd think the simple solution would be to give them "motivation" or replace them.

Gang Events are almost never hosted.

How is it that the same problems we had with 4 or 3 Gangs, we are having with two?

Two Gangs are MUCH easier to manage and keep active, and these problems shouldn't even be problems if they were properly managed.

No one has anything against the two, we're not smacking them with our bare hands, there are facts to all the "holler", as almost always.

People just tend to think yelling gets you better understood than speaking.