Graal Forums  

Go Back   Graal Forums > PlayerWorlds > Era Main Forum
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #23  
Old 09-07-2010, 04:32 AM
MontyPython MontyPython is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 268
MontyPython is a jewel in the roughMontyPython is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by papajchris View Post
The way the system works is:

if players act careless and don't use itemtrade, its a lose-lose (for the scammer and victim) as the item is auctioned off or deleted and the scammer is banned.
So you, the justice-seeking staff step in and become the true scammer. What a crafty way to create more ****ty money-sinks. But sometimes it gets deleted? What is your criteria for deciding whether or not something is deleted or auctioned off?



Quote:
Originally Posted by papajchris View Post
A 10 year ban seems long, but c'mon, no one will be banned for that long. sooner or later someone will unban them, whether its a year down the road, or a week after the final ban. It happens all the time.
So you admit it's a ridiculous sentence for the crime, and rather than have a just penalty you'll just stick them with 10 years and let them out whenever you feel so inclined. Great system.

I know this **** "happens all the time". It shouldn't.



Quote:
Originally Posted by papajchris View Post
The three strikes is more than enough of a warning for new players and old players alike to understand it is illegal. Scamming may become legal in the future, who knows, but until then it is illegal and the rules have to be followed. This isn't much different than how it was under Exolia, as we often reset the players instead of a life ban and then auctioned their items off. So this isn't really new.
No ****? I'm pretty sure we're all AWARE that it's illegal, but that's not the issue at hand. Why is it illegal? Exolia was just a shining example of a PR too, wasn't he? Globally banned now for item-spawners and various other infractions. What a great example to follow.


Honestly though, where's some administration to back this up? You're the only one defending this ****ty idea, I'd love to see some high-level staff try to explain (hopefully more coherently) how this is better.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 12:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.