I was just wondering, are we still using the dated (and pretty ambiguous) Playerworld Inspection guidelines? They don't really explain the process very well, what is expected of a playerworld, what kind of content is judged, what level its expected to be at, what happens after you've been inspected, or whether you're reviewed on a continued basis. We haven't had any of the current servers being reviewed in a while either, so it seems once you can assume your position is safe which shouldn't be the case.
It would be nice if the process could be defined a little better, and in my opinion servers should be reviewed at least once a year after they've reached their tab milestone.
10-15-2009, 09:04 PM
Threaded Mode