Quote:
Originally Posted by Darlene159
I disagree. I think the thread creator should be able to decide if the thread remains open, or whether they want to delete it or not.
|
Why does the thread creator get to dictate how long people can discuss a topic?
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoneAngelIbesu
Hm. I'd have to say that it's quite common to close threads that get off topic, or at least issue warnings to users. Many forums are actually quite strict about off topic posts.
|
We're not talking about topics that have become off-topic in this case.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoneAngelIbesu
It boils down to the intent of the original post. If I were posting an advertisement for people to come play my server, I wouldn't have any ground to stand on when trying to get the topic closed for critical posts. If I were posting a classified ad, looking to hire people, I would appreciate it if the topic remained at employment, and I would certainly get it closed if it turned in to a scathing criticism of content or quality of the server itself. I'm trying to get developers to work on my server, to make it better. The last thing I need is somebody deterring possible developers because of critiques/criticisms of the server in it's current state.
|
Those that have worked for you before have the right to inform the community about whatever problems you have.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crow
Very interesting point, which I almost completely agree with. I believe that a thread starter should be able to close (again, by request) their own thread when it's "outdated" though. For example, a hiring thread which does not apply anymore, since all wanted positions have been filled or whatever.
|
Why is something like having the OP and/or thread title edited to reflect the end of the hiring period not sufficient?