The players plea

Zurkiba · #1 08-24-2005, 11:13 PM

The attempts to take Bel'la Olplyn started officially on 06-23-2005, 04:41 PM. As I write this it is 08-24-2005, 5:01 PM.

We are entering our third month - and what have we to show for it? The Bel'la Olplyn still inactive and those who wish to fix it still fighting for the good of Graal 2002.

The Bel'la Olplyn have not been able to break a 19 member mark in those two months. They've been under the 50 percentile activity rating in those two months. The leadership is hardly on. The new members are recruited to create a false illusion of activity.

The globals are against the entity of the Bel'la Olplyns. The Graal 2002 staff are against the entity of the Bel'la Olplyns. The players are against the entity known as the Bel'la Olplyns.

For TWO MONTHS the likes of Kefkin and Etien have been under watch. For TWO MONTHS they have done nothing. For TWO MONTHS they have filibustered and tried to cheat the system to gain favor. For TWO MONTHS nothing was done about it other then the entire community expressing their disdain for the kingdom.

Why is it taking two months? During these two months many players have been asking me if I can add them to Zormite - I can not because I do not have the ability to. During these two months I have fought to help Graal Kingdoms out. During these two months I have witnessed and noted every small thing that happens. During these two months I have worked hand and hand with the Bel'la Olplyn members to teach them how to roleplay and explain what their kingdom is (in a very open sense of mind).

I, along with many others, plea that the administration of Graal Kingdoms and/or Graal Online will take action as quickly as possible so that we can begin to start to make Graal 2002 fun again. We ask why it is taking so long to make a decision to remove an inactive and bad leader or not. We ask why the Bel'las have not been removed dispite their use of abusive kingdom powers.

We ask why the administration does not want to help the community fix Graal Kingdoms.

konidias · #2 08-24-2005, 11:14 PM

This is why I think npc kings would be much more effective.

Luigi1 · #3 08-24-2005, 11:17 PM

"Yes, I agree" (directed toward Zurk's post, not Konidias)

Koni, don't turn this thread into an arguement about NPC kings -_-

Nappa · #4 08-24-2005, 11:27 PM

Agree with what Zurk said.

Koni, go the hell away.

OasaTor_PK · #5 08-24-2005, 11:35 PM

Why isn't the 2k2 staff doing anything about this?

Curt1zzle · #6 08-24-2005, 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by konidias

This is why I think npc kings would be much more effective.

Or better leaders should be picked. Belo Opera was a terrible addition, down with it.

"Hmmm...I don't like the president of our Nation...Ah, **** it, let's just worship and follow a golden calf."

Butz · #7 08-25-2005, 12:19 AM

And not to mention, the way things are now, you'd advance the world storyline and create better RP through an event that destroys the Drow than anything that has come from Bel'la through its continued existance.
Also, all this arguing would finally stop, ne?

Googi · #8 08-25-2005, 01:06 AM

The obsticles to removing Bel'la Olplyn are more about procedure than the staff actually obstructing their demise. Stefan needs to sign off on the removal for some reason, and he hasn't done so yet. Not because he actually opposes it, but just because he's, you know, Stefan.

Lance · #9 08-25-2005, 01:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by konidias

This is why I think npc kings would be much more effective.

Because competent, active administration certainly cannot handle such problems.

Zurkiba · #10 08-25-2005, 02:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Googi

The obsticles to removing Bel'la Olplyn are more about procedure than the staff actually obstructing their demise. Stefan needs to sign off on the removal for some reason, and he hasn't done so yet. Not because he actually opposes it, but just because he's, you know, Stefan.

Hopefully the cry of the community will speed things up a little :/

Googi · #11 08-25-2005, 03:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zurkiba

Hopefully the cry of the community will speed things up a little :/

Tell that to the grandaughter.

Tom84710 · #12 08-25-2005, 05:18 AM

I thought it was the staffs intention not to inferre with the matters of the roleplaying, but since there is no roleplaying...

I say

THEY TOOK ER JERBS (they took er decent kingdoms)

I like fish (people)

Googi · #13 08-25-2005, 05:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom84710

I thought it was the staffs intention not to inferre with the matters of the roleplaying

I don't recall this ever being said by any staff member.

xRuffRydax · #14 08-25-2005, 05:32 AM

I don't know how many topics and threads have been made about the whole BO thing, but nothing apparently is going to change since the staff don't want anything to do with this. It's frustrating, and very annoying. The majority of the players want them to be gone, and yet the staff don't act to this.. *sigh*

UberModeKappa · #15 08-25-2005, 10:51 AM

Maybe if the playercount maxed out at 10 for a week some shizzle would be done. There is soo much wrong with Graal Kingdomsand thats why I refuse to play it.