Welcome new Events Master

Sam · #1 03-24-2005, 11:14 PM

The players of Graal Kingdoms have decide that Raziel will be the new Events Master! He got 66 votes. Congratulations!

Damix got 45 and Graynt Alexander 42 votes.

My special thanks go to all of them for a non discriminatory election campain!
I wish Raziel a good hand for his new job and hope all of us will enjoy the events Raziel hosts in the future.

Sam
Events Admin

Crono · #2 03-24-2005, 11:16 PM

grats

Raziel · #3 03-25-2005, 01:23 AM

Thanks! Raz will now go and plan some better events.

2003_emily_2003 · #4 03-25-2005, 01:27 AM

Congratulations, have a slice of pie. o-o

Damix2 · #5 03-25-2005, 01:27 AM

Nice, I'm in Green, congrats Raz!

DrkXFactr · #6 03-25-2005, 01:53 AM

Congradulations, Raziel. Welcome to the team.

Gambet · #7 03-25-2005, 01:57 AM

Congrats

.

XGoLink · #8 03-25-2005, 03:57 PM

they should fire all those inactive peeps and hire me and some others

Arann · #9 03-26-2005, 01:06 AM

congrats

GoZelda · #10 03-26-2005, 01:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schlurfy

My special thanks go to all of them for a non discriminatory election campain!

What did you mean by that? And besides, what the freaking hell is wrong with discrimination? If it weren't for discrimination, you wouldn't have neccesarily been EM, nor would any of those even been chosen.

Congrats Raz, and Damix is leet too.
Congrats Arann with your 1st post!!!!!!111oneoneoneoneone!

Zero Hour · #11 03-26-2005, 01:35 AM

Try to enjoy it, Raziel!

Python523 · #12 03-26-2005, 02:08 AM

Popular vote is just another form of discrimination

XGoLink · #13 03-26-2005, 10:44 AM

Read your signature please..

Sam · #14 03-26-2005, 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoZelda

What did you mean by that?

discrimination:

unfair treatment of a person or group on the basis of prejudice.
I thought you kids learn this in school.

Lance · #15 03-26-2005, 12:42 PM

Didn't we try this once? With bad results? My memory refuses to cooperate.

GoZelda · #16 03-26-2005, 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schlurfy

discrimination:

unfair treatment of a person or group on the basis of prejudice.
I thought you kids learn this in school.

Quote:

dis·crim·i·na·tion
1. The act of discriminating (see below).
2. The ability or power to see or make fine distinctions; discernment.
3. Treatment or consideration based on class or category rather than individual merit; partiality or prejudice: racial discrimination; discrimination against foreigners.

Quote:

dis·crim·i·nat·ing
1.
1. Able to recognize or draw fine distinctions; perceptive.
2. Showing careful judgment or fine taste: a discriminating collector of rare books; a dish for the discriminating palate.
2. Separating into distinct parts or components; analytical.
3. Serving to distinguish; distinctive: a discriminating characteristic.
4. Marked by or showing bias; discriminatory.

Think -> Post. Words have more than one meaning.

GoZelda · #17 03-26-2005, 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lance

Didn't we try this once? With bad results? My memory refuses to cooperate.

Twice, although not exactly the same - the mayor events. They both turned out to be a great fiasco, especially the second. I remember you endorsed me or some word that looks like that. And then they voted Jagen Governor instead of you! See? Graal Kingdoms mainly consists of dumbasses.

Zero Hour · #18 03-26-2005, 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoZelda

Think -> Post. Words have more than one meaning.

That's true, words do have more than one meaning - but when you use them in a sentence you're usually only adhering to one definition, stop being dense, for example.

GoZelda · #19 03-26-2005, 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zero Hour

That's true, words do have more than one meaning - but when you use them in a sentence you're usually only adhering to one definition, stop being dense, for example.

Perhaps this meaning would've been clear to everybody if Sam's underlined sentence was coherent. Something like;

Thanks everybody for a election free of discrimination!

Which still doesn't really point out what he ment with discrimination.

Sam · #20 03-26-2005, 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoZelda

Perhaps this meaning would've been clear to everybody if Sam's underlined sentence was coherent. Something like;

Thanks everybody for a election free of discrimination!

Which still doesn't really point out what he ment with discrimination.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schlurfy

My special thanks go to all of them for a non discriminatory election campain!

Its in round trems what I meant, everyone understood it except you.
And now stop that off topic discussion, this is a thread to congrats the winner!

GoZelda · #21 03-26-2005, 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schlurfy

Its in round trems what I meant, everyone understood it except you.

Who said I didn't understand it? I'm just confused what a non-discriminatory election campaign would be. It doesn't make sense. Trust me. And trems, I assume that's a typo. Did you mean terms?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schlurfy

And now stop that off topic discussion, this is a thread to congrats the winner!

Who said this thread serves that purpose? It wasn't made clear in any of your previous posts.

Lance · #22 03-26-2005, 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoZelda

Twice, although not exactly the same - the mayor events. They both turned out to be a great fiasco, especially the second. I remember you endorsed me or some word that looks like that. And then they voted Jagen Governor instead of you! See? Graal Kingdoms mainly consists of dumbasses.

Actually, the Governor thing was a sort of joke, and I'm pretty sure Jagen and I tied in that.

I was speaking more about the person than the process. Raziel directly lied to me about the circumstances of some various items so that I would provide him with something for nothing. He admitted to it after I indicated that I knew he was lying, but it was a little late by that point. Ugh, and now he's being trusted with an EM job.

Lance · #23 03-26-2005, 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoZelda

Think -> Post. Words have more than one meaning.

Why are you arguing for an archaic definition when it's fairly obvious that he intends another? And you're telling him to "Think -> Post."?

Zero Hour · #24 03-26-2005, 10:34 PM

The fact of the matter is that aslong as the EM Admin is careful there doesn't need to be trust for the EMs... but that's inefficient, and the EM Admin, at that point, could be holding the events himself. I would just do that for a while to see if the person is trustworthy.

Methril · #25 03-26-2005, 11:34 PM

Quote:

Thanks everybody for a election free of discrimination!

It should be

Thanks everybody for an election free of discrimination!

Zero Hour · #26 03-26-2005, 11:35 PM

Way to be ruthless *******s.

GoZelda · #27 03-26-2005, 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lance

Actually, the Governor thing was a sort of joke, and I'm pretty sure Jagen and I tied in that.

I was aware that it was a sort of joke. I heard Jagen won though, must be mistaken then.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lance

I was speaking more about the person than the process. Raziel directly lied to me about the circumstances of some various items so that I would provide him with something for nothing. He admitted to it after I indicated that I knew he was lying, but it was a little late by that point. Ugh, and now he's being trusted with an EM job.

I think I'm not very far from the truth if I say that atleast 50% of Graal Kingdom's staff have a... shady background, so I doubt Raziel will be reconsidered over those things.

XGoLink · #28 03-27-2005, 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lance

Ugh, and now he's being trusted with an EM job.

True.. And hes probably sharing his gold account with Dehitaj..

Lance · #29 03-27-2005, 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoZelda

I think I'm not very far from the truth if I say that atleast 50% of Graal Kingdom's staff have a... shady background, so I doubt Raziel will be reconsidered over those things.

Well, I didn't directly suggest that he should be, but I'm curious: why not?

Zero Hour · #30 03-27-2005, 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoZelda

I think I'm not very far from the truth if I say that atleast 50% of Graal Kingdom's staff have a... shady background, so I doubt Raziel will be reconsidered over those things.

I didn't have a shady background before I joined as staff - and I would like to think I still don't have one, unless you consider those few things we've discussed as shady.

Raziel · #31 03-27-2005, 10:49 PM

I didn't lie to you to get something for nothing... I admit I lied, but it was because I had been scammed, and if I told you I got scammed from selling something through AIM, you wouldn't have cared... anyway, yes, I admit that was wrong on my part, and I apologize, yet again.

And, uh, no? I don't share my account, sorry.

GoZelda · #32 03-27-2005, 11:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lance

Well, I didn't directly suggest that he should be, but I'm curious: why not?

Well, the main reason for my - due to the lack of a better word in my vocabulary - 'distrust' is that Zero Hour (no offense) was reassigned even after he openly admitted in his leaving thread that he had been corrupt. Also, it seems to me that certain rumours of staffmember x's corruptness (or incompetence) had never even been checked for a core of truth.
I have doubt in the trustworthness of most staffmembers because of all the rumors and 'evidence', and I doubt their competence (for a part due to own experience) although this of course is quite biased and terribly influenced by outside sources.

GoZelda · #33 03-27-2005, 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zero Hour

I didn't have a shady background before I joined as staff - and I would like to think I still don't have one, unless you consider those few things we've discussed as shady.

http://forums.graalonline.com/forums...hlight=corrupt

It's not like I have a problem with you, I like you, but well. You said it here and so I doubt you.

Zero Hour · #34 03-28-2005, 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoZelda

http://forums.graalonline.com/forums...hlight=corrupt

It's not like I have a problem with you, I like you, but well. You said it here and so I doubt you.

Breaking rules to punish, or punishing when there was no rule in place. The rules can't and don't cover everything, so I do.

GoZelda · #35 03-28-2005, 12:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zero Hour

The rules can't and don't cover everything, so I do.

If you read the Graal user agreement then you would've known you weren't corrupt.

Well, I guess my judgement over shady backgrounds is less solid now.

Zero Hour · #36 03-28-2005, 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoZelda

If you read the Graal user agreement then you would've known you weren't corrupt.

I suppose that's a very good point, yes.

Quote:

Well, I guess my judgement over shady backgrounds is less solid now.

I'm not sure whether or not to take you seriously, so I will take what you say for it's face value.