Quote:
Originally posted by brock128
Playerworlds are REALLY low quality. Nothing to replace classic, which is pretty dead-esq right now.
|
Not all playerworlds are low quality. Albeit there are some of them that shouldn't be up there, there are quite a few of them that have done nicely. I've been on Era for the past few days, and even though they're far from complete, they have something that is different, and fun. Also, I've gone on different playerworlds from time to time, and some of them show good improvement, and some don't. Doomsday, and Delteria have nice content on them, and so does N-Pulse. And to the upcoming playerworlds that are in private, I do applaud them for getting as far as they are now.
Yes, Graal is changing. I for one was not here in those 1.31 days, so I cannot say that I appreciate what Graal was; though if I had the chance to experience playing in that peice of Graal's history, I would. However, it's not the levels, the npc's or the overall content: It's the community. For example, even though Mithica wasn't the most popular playerworld, it is where I played
all the time. Other playerworlds had content that far surpassed Mithica's, but that didn't matter at all to me whatsoever, because I enjoyed Mithica's community.
Some people do not like how Graal has changed, and thus you have the oldbies leaving, and to take their place you have all these newcomers to Graal, whom will one day become legendary in their own right. What people seem to long for is lost friends who they once had fun with on Graal. They want that timeframe back so that they can be amongst familiar faces, having the fun they once did. Which is why I think (but could be very wrong) that if the community of Graal was a more stagnant one, then people wouldn't have that much of a problem with it's changes.