lyndzey?

[Lance]

Originally posted by bigdawg1003


Its not that you are not allowed to argue its just that we think there are a few too many arguments that shouldnt really have come up.

Oh, so I'm not allowed to raise a valid question about a possible infringement upon the rules of good conduct?

[haunter]

Originally posted by bigdawg1003


Its not that you are not allowed to argue its just that we think there are a few too many arguments that shouldnt really have come up.

I think that if someone posts something, someone who disagrees with them is bound to post their opinion on that subject. Then it will most likely escalate from there.

[bigdawg1003]

Originally posted by Lance


Oh, so I'm not allowed to raise a valid question about a possible infringement upon the rules of good conduct?

Sure you can do that but don't let it drag on into another pointless argument

[Kaimetsu]

Originally posted by bigdawg1003
Sure you can do that but don't let it drag on into another pointless argument

Such things are not always pointless. I see no reason to prohibit discussion of these matters.

[protagonist]

Originally posted by Neoreno


I remember tonnes of arguments before you had to pay, the largest being the ones involving Queen Undine. Man, she gave me a headache.

H a h a

I remember her. Ahaha she was so arrogant.
Was she actually good at arguing or did she just speak "like this my peasant"?

[Neoreno]

Terrible at arguing, and had this odd fascination with Britney Spears. Eugh. Fiercelink also springs to mind. He was nearly as bad.

[jake13jake]

Originally posted by bigdawg1003


Its not that you are not allowed to argue its just that we think there are a few too many arguments that shouldnt really have come up.

That isn't quite what I meant... I was more referring to when arguments get out of hand and go off topic, etc.

[Lance]

Originally posted by jake13jake


That isn't quite what I meant... I was more referring to when arguments get out of hand and go off topic, etc.

• Off-topic posting is not a violation of the rules
• Debating an issue is not a violation of the rules
• 1+1=2

Do the math.

[bigdawg1003]

Im not saying that the arguments are breaking the rules they are just becoming a little too often.

[Lance]

Originally posted by bigdawg1003
Im not saying that the arguments are breaking the rules they are just becoming a little too often.

You're not understanding what I'm saying. You said the moderators should take action merely because of a personal preference of yours, when there are no violations of the rules involved. Do you see what's wrong with this?

[superb]

Irony = Arguing over whether or not there's too much arguing here.

[syltburk]

Originally posted by Lance

• Off-topic posting is not a violation of the rules
• Debating an issue is not a violation of the rules
• 1+1=2

Do the math.

But do you think its necessery, to me this isn't a question of the rules, its a question if it really need to be like this?

[Kaimetsu]

Originally posted by syltburk
But do you think its necessery, to me this isn't a question of the rules, its a question if it really need to be like this?

It's not necessary for you to continue posting here. Does that mean I should ban you?

Necessity is not the only justification for being.

[syltburk]

Originally posted by Kaimetsu


It's not necessary for you to continue posting here.

You neither.

[jake13jake]

Originally posted by Lance

• Off-topic posting is not a violation of the rules
• Debating an issue is not a violation of the rules
• 1+1=2

Do the math.

• A significant amount of people don't enjoy the off topic posting, arguing, and bickering.
• We paid for our message board access and therefore you should care what we think.
• 1+1=2

Do the math. If it isn't against the rules already then it should be.