30-second wait for searching - Page 3

cbk1994 · #31 05-04-2008, 03:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kia345

It's safe to say no one gives a damn.

Which is sad, seeing as there's no real drawback to shortening the wait.

Unfortunately, it would seem so.

It's quite annoying to have to wait 30 seconds to find something, then needing to try a different keyword, etc.

cbk1994 · #32 05-24-2008, 04:00 PM

Any progress?

kia345 · #33 05-24-2008, 04:02 PM

They won't make money, no.

cbk1994 · #34 05-27-2008, 05:20 AM

Elizabeth · #35 05-27-2008, 08:30 PM

i dislike the thirty second wait.
it should be five-ten second wait

cbk1994 · #36 06-04-2008, 08:58 PM

Hammatime?

kia345 · #37 06-08-2008, 07:00 PM

Bump for searching, I accidently ran into this whilst searching for something completely different, and have to wait half a minute to search again.

cbk1994 · #38 06-08-2008, 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kia345

Bump for searching, I accidently ran into this whilst searching for something completely different, and have to wait half a minute to search again.

Proof of concept ;o

cbk1994 · #39 06-13-2008, 02:15 AM

kia345 · #40 06-13-2008, 02:27 AM

Me and Chris agree on this, it must be good.

Elizabeth · #41 06-13-2008, 03:39 AM

whos chris

cbk1994 · #42 06-13-2008, 04:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kia345

Me and Chris agree on this, it must be good.

Yet there are other things I agree with you on that definitely aren't so good

DustyPorViva · #43 06-13-2008, 04:41 AM

I'll post along with this again, but you know... we haven't given good reasons! Just a bunch of whining!

cbk1994 · #44 06-13-2008, 04:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DustyPorViva

I'll post along with this again, but you know... we haven't given good reasons! Just a bunch of whining!

lolwat

DustyPorViva · #45 06-13-2008, 04:53 AM

Hmm? Oh... just grabbing stuff from that video rules thread. A bunch of post with reasonable, civil points on why it's a dumb rule, and gets dismissed as whining and off-topic.