Harassement on Era - Page 3

Lyndzey · #1 07-16-2003, 10:55 PM

Signas never seemed like the kind of guy to do something like that.

The only thing that led me to believe this is that Era Mafia and Tachi are always at war (Seara is the leader of Tachi and he is the leader of EM)

Golbez · #2 07-16-2003, 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lyndzey
Signas never seemed like the kind of guy to do something like that.

The only thing that led me to believe this is that Era Mafia and Tachi are always at war (Seara is the leader of Tachi and he is the leader of EM)

Well there was no one in Era Mafia it was just Sig, he was going to hire more people but he never did. Tachi and EM were at war but all gangs are lol. EM basically was in no condition to fight a war. I dont think he would do this over a war.. o.O

protagonist · #3 07-17-2003, 12:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kaimetsu
Back on topic (separated into two posts so as not to diminish the importance of this one):

I received the following from Signas himself:

Judge it on its merits. I can't assume that he's telling the truth, but, personally, I extend to him the benefit of the doubt.

That is the oldest, oldest, oldest trick in the book. It's so old it's old.

Evil_Trunks · #4 07-09-2005, 10:40 AM

seara u r the worst gang leader ever

thesaiyan · #5 07-17-2003, 01:59 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by protagonist

That is the oldest, oldest, oldest trick in the book. It's so old it's old.

I was going to say exaclty that.

Princess_Galadriel16 · #6 07-17-2003, 02:38 AM

Wasnt Signa banned from era, well he is on his other account and he is in era mafia (vsignasv). He is ban evading.

Princess_Galadriel16 · #7 07-17-2003, 02:48 AM

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To whom it may concern:

If you are a recipient of this letter, you have been following the case of sexual harassment against the person you know as "Seara Yamada." I am deeply saddened if you have been offended in any way as a result of the textual attacks that she, and the entire population of era received on July the 14th. I can not take these remarks away but hopefully I can logically explain them to you. Let me explain.

Many of you may know a graalian player named "Midnight Reaver." He was a real-life friend of mine till a short while ago. The two of us got into a fight and I have decided to cut our friendship off. I had previously accessed the graal client at his house so my account and password were both recorded into his accounts cache. The perfect way to take out any anger and bad blood he had towards me. He then proceeded to harass several players including "Lone Blue Wolf" and "Seara Yamada." Even though it was not me who committed these vile and disturbing acts I do, however accept full responsibility for them seeing as it was my own ignorance that got me into this trouble.

I will apologize to both of the "victims" of these textual attacks. I hope you will accept my appology as well. Please forgive me for the acts of a spiteful person. He will get what is coming to him in due time. I look forward to seeing you soon.

Regretfully Yours,
Andrew Jack
"Signas"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Is that saying it wasnt him? Then someone else was on his AIM name too harrasing me with the same things so i put him on ignore then he massed that out on Era. So how could someone have his AIM password and his graal password? It was Signas.. not anyone else. that is just somthing to make it look like it wasnt him.

*edit*
another thing.. i hear that yall are checking IP differences on it..well that can easily be a lie... he can go to a friends house get on the account from there and did what he did..then went home and acted like it was his friend. now he changed his aim name to act like it wasnt him AIMing me ..how did he know my aim name because when he was on Mistreated Nome AIM he knew my aim name... we had been talking before this incident for several days. but not like all the time. but that was his name.. untilli blocked him and so he made a new name so he can talk to me.. so it was him what he is saying is just some cheap trick for you to go look the other way and let him get away with this ..acting all innocent.

thesaiyan · #8 07-17-2003, 02:50 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Princess_Galadriel16
Wasnt Signa banned from era, well he is on his other account and he is in era mafia (vsignasv). He is ban evading.

Yea I noticed that too. He is on another account with the leader rank for Era Mafia. I would have jailed him or something but some arse deleted all my npcs.

Kaimetsu · #9 07-17-2003, 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Golbez
Signas IMed me this

Goddamn you, I didn't see that before I made my post.

Golbez · #10 07-18-2003, 06:14 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Princess_Galadriel16

Well, now that you told us that he IMed you and said this it makes a big differance. He shouldnt get away with this

protagonist · #11 07-19-2003, 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Golbez

Well, now that you told us that he IMed you and said this it makes a big differance. He shouldnt get away with this

Demon · #12 07-23-2003, 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kaimetsu

Goddamn you, I didn't see that before I made my post.

If there is a god, do you really want it to damn him?

190 · #13 07-23-2003, 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Princess_Galadriel16
Thanks guys. No one should be treated like this no matter what. So thanks

I personally think that is terriable. I think it is Moonies quite. "We dont stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing". Sorry your getting treated like this, its rude and ignorant...

HoudiniMan · #14 07-23-2003, 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Demon

If there is a god, do you really want it to damn him?

The thread was inactive for 4 days, while that's a little iffy reviving it would have been ok if you hadn't been spamming. But you were...

Kaimetsu · #15 07-24-2003, 01:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Demon
If there is a god, do you really want it to damn him?

I am working under the safe assumptions that:

1) There isn't.
2) Even if there was, it wouldn't do what I say.

Darlene159 · #16 07-24-2003, 03:18 AM

I swear, if this turns into some kind of religious arguement over Kai saying something that greatly offended me to start with, I will put a bullet in my computer screen, so please stop before it begins

TifaKhan · #17 07-24-2003, 05:46 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Darlene159
I swear, if this turns into some kind of religious arguement over Kai saying something that greatly offended me to start with, I will put a bullet in my computer screen, so please stop before it begins

And leave me all alone?

Best thing to do is not reply i think, then theres nobody to keep it going...

Kaimetsu · #18 07-24-2003, 06:03 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Darlene159
I swear, if this turns into some kind of religious arguement over Kai saying something that greatly offended me to start with, I will put a bullet in my computer screen, so please stop before it begins

You're offended by something so... inoffensive? It's ridiculous to object to the assumptions that I make, so your only half-justifiable complaint is about me saying that the assumption is safe. And hey, it is safe. That's pretty much a fact. From a scientific, logical, analytic perspective, god is unlikely to exist. If you wanna believe in him anyway then that's fine, but you shouldn't delude yourself into thinking that the belief is logically founded.

protagonist · #19 07-24-2003, 06:09 AM

If you are assuming there is no God, you aren't being agnostic I don't think.

konidias · #20 07-24-2003, 06:56 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by protagonist
If you are assuming there is no God, you aren't being agnostic I don't think.

That would make him athiest. Back on topic people.

Kaimetsu · #21 07-24-2003, 07:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by protagonist
If you are assuming there is no God, you aren't being agnostic I don't think.

No, I only assumed it for the purpose of that post. The whole point of assumptions is that they can be used as platforms for further reasoning etc. Assuming something doesn't mean you believe it.

protagonist · #22 07-24-2003, 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kaimetsu

No, I only assumed it for the purpose of that post. The whole point of assumptions is that they can be used as platforms for further reasoning etc. Assuming something doesn't mean you believe it.

Alright. However, I am also wondering about your use of the term God damn.

You've stated in previous debates that you believe the most logical explanation for the Bible is that it is a bunch of fairytales blown out of proportion.
Keeping that in mind, your use of the word "God" in God damn makes about as much logical sense as using the word "Bambi", "Dumbo", "Cinderella", or any other popular fairytale character. The difference is, you are more likely to offend Theists by using the word God than if you used those fairytale characters instead.

Kaimetsu · #23 07-24-2003, 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by protagonist
Keeping that in mind, your use of the word "God" in God damn makes about as much logical sense as using the word "Bambi", "Dumbo", "Cinderella", or any other popular fairytale character. The difference is, you are more likely to offend Theists by using the word God than if you used those fairytale characters instead.

No, the difference is that people would think I am crazy if I said 'Cinderelladamn'. Do I strike you as a person that tries to avoid offending theists? Anybody stupid enough to be offended by the word 'goddamn' is not worthy of my respect or my courtesy.

protagonist · #24 07-24-2003, 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kaimetsu

No, the difference is that people would think I am crazy if I said 'Cinderelladamn'. Do I strike you as a person that tries to avoid offending theists? Anybody stupid enough to be offended by the word 'goddamn' is not worthy of my respect or my courtesy.

Well, I guess some people are offended. :|

Cinderelladamn would be funny, though.

Kaimetsu · #25 07-24-2003, 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by protagonist
Well, I guess some people are offended. :|

Then they should examine their own standards and stop being so foolish.

Drakmith · #26 07-25-2003, 07:43 AM

Good God Seara... Why didn't you tell me this o_o?

You know full well I would have burnt the guy's account into the Stone Age for that sort of thing.

I've jailed him repeatedly for using racist remarks before.. But someone always freaking unjails him because, "He's black, so it's not racism"

syltburk · #27 07-25-2003, 03:44 PM

umg what do you think with? UR LEGS?

THIS IS ERA K?????

wtf did u think it was gonna be, a holy place with guns people running around shooting echuder getting pissed on graal if u run and heal, dont get me wrong, i dont like this or anything that got any connection with harrasment,

but still era is era, will always be era people say "wazzzup f000" then you maibe say "dont call me that u little ****"

and there it goes,

era must be the server that got most against rule people,

you can ban 100 graalians, but these harrasments will be forever...

sorry "f00s"

RecycleBin · #28 07-09-2005, 06:09 AM

Ahh..The good old days.

Obvious · #29 07-09-2005, 06:14 AM

Leave it to Minh to revive a thread that's been untouched for two years.

xAndrewx · #30 07-09-2005, 08:35 AM

Yes, the good old days.

kenyonandelliot · #31 07-09-2005, 09:19 AM

I never noticed that this happened..

Rick · #32 07-09-2005, 09:40 AM

The hell did you revive this thread for Minh?

syltburk · #33 07-09-2005, 11:32 AM

haha signas, the worst mr take offence guy i ever met..