Suggestion Thread: Let's get down to some specifics. - Page 17

Cetellic · #**241** 03-30-2009, 11:08 PM

@ Gladius - ummm... apparently you're really really hurt and you really really need to settle down a bit... it's not that serious...

@ Mystic - modern events system won't save the world, but it'd be a positive change. Upgrading should be something on the side

MysticX2X · #**242** 03-30-2009, 11:52 PM

It should be a priority actually. You believe the problem with GC now lies within the GC team and tickets, when the GC team isn't even the case and the tickets are playing a minor role. If other servers already have a higher tech events system, why do they want to play Classic events which run slow and take a very long time and aren't even aware of most event rules?

You seem to ignore the big picture here but you haven't played other servers so I realize where your ignorance comes from.

Cetellic · #**243** 03-30-2009, 11:54 PM

I've been to NPulse, Era, and UN, I've played events from those servers, their systems aren't that much of a difference.

maximus_asinus · #**244** 03-31-2009, 12:00 AM

I don't know what happened, or why you're all bickering. Gladius is right, when there are 40 people online, you should be hosting an event that'll involve everyone. Not everyone is going to wait around for a half hour incase there is a second or third event hosted. There is very little to do when you're not in an event, which is made even worse when half of the people you're normally 'hanging' with are offtag and in an event.

Really the GC team needs to write a guideline to determine what events should be hosted when X amount of players are online. A GC hosting only what they want is selfish, think of the players first.

maximus_asinus · #**245** 03-31-2009, 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MysticX2X

It should be a priority actually. You believe the problem with GC now lies within the GC team and tickets, when the GC team isn't even the case and the tickets are playing a minor role. If other servers already have a higher tech events system, why do they want to play Classic events which run slow and take a very long time and aren't even aware of most event rules?

You seem to ignore the big picture here but you haven't played other servers so I realize where your ignorance comes from.

I've discussed this with Nighty, and he has no plans on updating this archaic system. Things like summoning should have been phased out as soon as we got the NPC server. We have the technology, why aren't we utilizing it?

BlackSolider · #**246** 03-31-2009, 01:33 AM

It seems clel is so overcome by the flood of knowledge I released that he is mistaking his own pain for someone else's. Nonetheless, the only thing I really know from other servers that we could use is on Era where you click the message to join events. No more server summons, no more "i wasnt pming for event" complainers, etc. Beyond that my knowledge is shallow and pedantic, though an update could be useful.

Cetellic · #**247** 03-31-2009, 01:40 AM

You rinse repeat as usual... look back at some posts of mine, your points have already been solved

BlackSolider · #**248** 03-31-2009, 01:51 AM

Apparently you didn't read how you prove someone wrong with facts, not opinions. Just because my opinion isn't the same as your opinion, you don't win by stating your opinion. Nice try though clel. I'll keep repeating myself if necessary, even if you can't handle the truth (movie quote)!!!!1

Cetellic · #**249** 03-31-2009, 01:55 AM

it's not opinion, it's true, if you overhost A, then A will get boring... wow Clel rocks how does he do it O.o?!

WhiteDragon · #**250** 03-31-2009, 02:06 AM

Guys, please take this to PMs or the GC forums. This thread is for specific suggestions, not arguing.

BlackSolider · #**251** 03-31-2009, 02:36 AM

Yes, that is true. But guess what clel, its not what I said! Go figure.

And using the same tactic as you: if players don't like C, why would you host it? Sounds logical enough.

xnervNATx · #**252** 03-31-2009, 05:15 AM

i hope you will not do like gc board . 50 pages of bull****

MysticX2X · #**253** 03-31-2009, 05:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cetellic

I've been to NPulse, Era, and UN, I've played events from those servers, their systems aren't that much of a difference.

They make it more apparent that they're hosting and what the rules of their events are. I'm not suggesting all automated but something to resolve a quick join to events (Which a poll has been posted for).

Cetellic · #**254** 03-31-2009, 05:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xnervNATx

i hope you will not do like gc board . 50 pages of bull****

honestly I'm not even gonna bother with nothing of that nature, I'm not the best at explainin junk so I have no business trying to in the first place

Kill · #**255** 03-31-2009, 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MysticX2X

why do they want to play Classic events which run slow and take a very long time

That is indeed very true.
Someone like Rob who was a Classic regular left the server for Era because he doesn't like how long events on Classic take - mostly due to the set up and the summoning of accounts which is pretty much a waste of time if you think about it.

I'm in favour of a technological advance - Classic's system is outdated, and sure, it would save you guys a lot of hassle and cure the problem with summon bias by someGCs... but if you change it to look like everyone elses' -- What makes it Classic?!

The only other problem I could see with using a 'join event' system would be the fact we're now shifting away from player-run events onto robot-like events. I mean, seriously guys... What would differentiate you GCs hosting from a robot?!

Also, the GCs have been pampered quite a bit lately though bringing up valid points that I myself brought up back when I was a GC, yet Night didn't listen to me. I'd be surprised if he changes his mind now.