Cannot test out Graal 3

TSonicWarp9 · #1 08-13-2004, 11:19 PM

I get an error in XP that says I need to send Microsoft and error report each time I attempt to start the program.

Not that I care much, I was just wondering if this is a known bug before I go thrashing away at my registery and kernel.

Turles_is_back · #2 08-13-2004, 11:50 PM

Why do you think graalians can help you? Post this problem in a windows XP forum or a tech place... x_X

** I didn't see the topic. But still, go away.

TSonicWarp9 · #3 08-13-2004, 11:53 PM

This is the tech support section, is it not?

Turles_is_back · #4 08-13-2004, 11:53 PM

I didn't see the topic, someone send me the link via IRC. I'm sorry.

No I'm not.

Skyerus · #5 08-13-2004, 11:59 PM

I get the same error too. It's weird because I only get that error on one of my accounts, if I log on another I don't get that error.

TSonicWarp9 · #6 08-14-2004, 12:03 AM

I get the error just trying to start the program. I don't get a chance to put in a username.

ReBorn_Spirit · #7 08-27-2004, 01:39 PM

*Puts down one more bad mark for Windows XP in her personal score sheets*

...come on people.. I'm using that windows ME and still more stable and faster then most XP users that I know.

Darlene159 · #8 08-27-2004, 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ReBorn_Spirit

*Puts down one more bad mark for Windows XP in her personal score sheets*

...come on people.. I'm using that windows ME and still more stable and faster then most XP users that I know.

I had nothing but problems with ME, and not one single problem with XP

As for the error....I get that alot when trying to use something tied into IE...I have nothing but problems with Internet Explorer

Scott · #9 08-28-2004, 04:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ReBorn_Spirit

...come on people.. I'm using that windows ME and still more stable and faster then most XP users that I know.

Your're a bloody idiot. Windows ME is in no way more stable or faster than XP. Good god, XP runs off Win2k technology and Win2k is supposed to be the most stable Windows OS (From what I've read.) ;o

falco10291029 · #10 08-28-2004, 04:36 AM

hmm well the onnly problem i could think of is admin related. XP seems to hate limited users lol. If you installed graal as an admin most likely it is having problems with a limited account using it. I am not sure if either of those is true in your case, but im just trying to help.

nullify · #11 08-28-2004, 06:05 AM

Windows? Stable?

I have the problem too, but I'll live.

Zero Hour · #12 08-28-2004, 04:45 PM

I have the same problem "TSonicWarp9"

I don't remember the error code I got, though.

Crono · #13 08-28-2004, 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ReBorn_Spirit

*Puts down one more bad mark for Windows XP in her personal score sheets*

*puts down one more bad mark for anyother thing that messes up at anything in his personal score sheets*

Quote:

...come on people.. I'm using that windows ME and still more stable and faster then most XP users that I know.

That HAS to be one of the most retarded things i've read this week. Please get your facts straight, ME is one of the worst windows OS. Windows 2000/XP are the most stable and much better.

falco10291029 · #14 08-29-2004, 01:01 AM

yeah seriously actually windows 98 is better then ME as i figured out when i first used ME a while ago now i use XP

nullify · #15 08-30-2004, 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by falco10291029

yeah seriously actually windows 98 is better then ME as i figured out when i first used ME a while ago now i use XP

What do you mean "actually"? EVERYONE knows that ME is the worst peice of software to come out with a liscense.