Graal for PSP or DS?

thrashsoul · #1 07-07-2004, 01:24 AM

I think it would be alot better try if we do a PSP or DS game. Having wifi and other great features will make it fun for players... Its hard to get an SDK right now though.

haunter · #2 07-07-2004, 01:40 AM

Oh god... Please don't give them any ideas... -_-;

Hairballmunky · #3 07-07-2004, 02:43 AM

Anyone remember Graal for GBA? I sure dont

brock128 · #4 07-07-2004, 02:59 AM

How can I put this polit-
GOOD GOD NO.

protagonist · #5 07-07-2004, 03:01 AM

It would never be completed. *points to GBA*

MaverickOriginal · #6 07-07-2004, 03:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brock128

GOOD GOD NO.

ditto?----

Nitkizi · #7 07-07-2004, 03:24 AM

Ahahahaha XD

Myukoi · #8 07-07-2004, 03:58 AM

lol why not? neopets is making a ps1 game that no one wants to buy, it looks very horrible. maybe it will be like the ff CG movie and everyone will hate it and graal will lose alot of money.

haunter · #9 07-07-2004, 03:59 AM

Graal doesn't have any money to lose! All the employees would have to sell their teeth!

Myukoi · #10 07-07-2004, 04:06 AM

? I think they would have alot of money from all these playerworlds.

XJOKERX · #11 07-07-2004, 05:02 AM

Ok before you say things think. Do you know how much they pay for hosting and all that?

Myukoi · #12 07-07-2004, 05:06 AM

Who are you directing that to? ._. i'm sure with all the playerworlds and people getting vip and classic accounts and the gold subscribers that they have a good amount of money. they had enough to hire people for graal3d, even if it isn't erm the most advanced looking game.

brock128 · #13 07-07-2004, 05:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Myukoi

lol why not? neopets is making a ps1 game that no one wants to buy, it looks very horrible. maybe it will be like the ff CG movie and everyone will hate it and graal will lose alot of money.

"HEY TWO FRANCHISES DID SOMETHING DRASTICLY AGAINST WHAT THEY BOTH FOR! BOTH FAILED MISERABLY! LET'S HAVE GRAAL DO THE SAME THING SO IT CAN MAKE MONEY!"

What ARE you smoking?

I wouldn't really consider neopets a failure, but they are really going against everything they used to stand for. I mean, c'mon, trading card games and Mcdonalds toys for a free website game?

Myukoi · #14 07-07-2004, 05:39 AM

? You did not sense the sarcasm.

Xecutor · #15 07-07-2004, 05:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Myukoi

? You did not sense the sarcasm.

You can do that?

Spark910 · #16 07-07-2004, 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Myukoi

? I think they would have alot of money from all these playerworlds.

Most of the playerworlds are just to pay for the new servers and things that have been introduced since the new servers.

HoudiniMan · #17 07-07-2004, 08:54 PM

Graal would get Nintendo's attention if it was ever released on a gaming system...

Anybody ever played "Link to the past"?
We still use half their tiles.

Crono · #18 07-07-2004, 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HoudiniMan

Graal would get Nintendo's attention if it was ever released on a gaming system...

Anybody ever played "Link to the past"?
We still use half their tiles.

And the bodies look the same. Not only that but we have heads BASED ON LINK, DBZ, AND OTHER POPULAR SHOWSZL @#@(#@

Anyone ever notice how link and graalians are all left handed? I sure do -cough-

Quote:

Originally Posted by Myukoi

? You did not sense the sarcasm.

Dude I couldn't tell if you were joking or being serious. Stuff like that always comes from you :/

brock128 · #19 07-07-2004, 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerami

Anyone ever notice how link and graalians are all left handed? I sure do -cough-

It could be a coincidence.

Better proof would be the game's old title: ZELDA ONLINE?

LordMatt · #20 07-07-2004, 10:15 PM

water tiles and cliff tiles remind me of graal

protagonist · #21 07-07-2004, 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brock128

Better proof would be the game's old title: ZELDA ONLINE?

THAT COULD MEAN ANYTHING!

LordMatt · #22 07-07-2004, 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by protagonist

THAT COULD MEAN ANYTHING!

Sure....yeah....like what?

Crono · #23 07-07-2004, 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brock128

It could be a coincidence.

Better proof would be the game's old title: ZELDA ONLINE?

Compare the default graal dude slashing next to link slashing.

brock128 · #24 07-07-2004, 10:56 PM

It's not that you're wrong. It's that "OMG TWO CHARACTERS ARE LEFTHANDDED CONSPIRICY" isn't very good proof.

But I digress. I'm nitpicking. So uh... yea.

Chrismas · #25 07-08-2004, 12:55 AM

Lets not all forget graal for GBC either.

TESTRETIS · #26 07-08-2004, 01:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrismas

Lets not all forget graal for GBC either.

My friend had the rom and he said it ran like crap. 0.o

Myukoi · #27 07-08-2004, 01:38 AM

I remember the GBA rom, that was boring. Why would an MMORPG have a console game? I mean.. just why? It wasn't based on a comic or cartoon or book.. it would just be useless.

Chrismas · #28 07-08-2004, 01:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TESTRETIS

My friend had the rom and he said it ran like crap. 0.o

I had it too, there was nothing on it.

TESTRETIS · #29 07-08-2004, 01:50 AM

he said there was some switch character funciton and it didnt even work right, and teh colors were all funky and it had baddies, bushes, the beginning of a quest, a house and thats it..

Crono · #30 07-08-2004, 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LordMatt

Sure....yeah....like what?

Why, playing Zelda: Link to the past online rather than offline of course

<3

NovaNET · #31 07-08-2004, 11:51 AM

1) They would need a production firm to be interested in their product and due to its similiarity to Zelda ... I dont know any company in their right mind that would produce it.

2) So they would then need the production cost ... you do the math most companies require tens of thousands for printing and production... plus advertising.

In anycase the simple fact it Neopets has several million users and has retail stores and excellent advertising deals which they make millions off of and graal has what?

Crono · #32 07-08-2004, 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NovaNET

In anycase the simple fact it Neopets has several million users and has retail stores and excellent advertising deals which they make millions off of and graal has what?

Me .

Myukoi · #33 07-09-2004, 09:42 PM

If it had Graal Kingdoms graphics and gameplay i would love it.

you could base it on the bomy storyline and maybe still be able to cook and stuff. you could put it on DS or something.

XJOKERX · #34 07-10-2004, 01:02 AM

Myukoi you don't seem to understand what I said, spark said it pretty good. GRAAL USES ALL THE SERVERS AND SUCH TO PAY OFF THEIR DEBTS, leaving little money for profit, much less profit which to start a game on a portable game console nobody knows will even succeed yet (Screw polls, they mean crap)

teshy2 · #35 07-10-2004, 01:15 AM

Joker has a good point. Even a company such as SOE or Blizzard who have/will have hundreds of thousands of paying customers spend extreme amounts of money on hosting, staff, etc... it takes a good while to get on the plus side and even then they don't make as much profit as people would think.

Googi · #36 07-10-2004, 03:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Myukoi

maybe it will be like the ff CG movie and everyone will hate it and graal will lose alot of money.

Is that really a good thing?

WanDaMan · #37 07-10-2004, 09:49 AM

what makes you think they havn't allready started?

Neonight · #38 07-16-2004, 04:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Myukoi

I remember the GBA rom, that was boring. Why would an MMORPG have a console game? I mean.. just why? It wasn't based on a comic or cartoon or book.. it would just be useless.

I wouldn't call Graal a MMORPG in the first place. I'd just called it a MORPG. Besides, the Graal that was made into a ROM wasn't an RPG in the first place. It was an action/adventure game.

I don't really understand why people still call LTTP an RPG.