Dont Delete Me Aka Sup

Scott · #1 03-17-2004, 01:15 AM

Since my hello threads seem to keep getting abducted, I put up an anti-jerk shield on this thread.'

BACK <3 x3

Nick1988 · #2 03-17-2004, 01:35 AM

Abduct this thread!

Hey.

Damix2 · #3 03-17-2004, 01:51 AM

We all know your back you don't need to keep making threads

Darlene159 · #4 03-17-2004, 02:02 AM

I dont know who is deleting them, but everyone knows you are back so really, there is no need to keep making the threads.....
Anyway, welcome back, I guess

haunter · #5 03-17-2004, 02:22 AM

I dont think it's the actual fact that people won't see this thread that's upsetting... But more the principle of it... There was no reason given as to the utter disappearence of the last two threads...

Hi Scooter...

Darlene159 · #6 03-17-2004, 02:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by haunter
I dont think it's the actual fact that people won't see this thread that's upsetting... But more the principle of it... There was no reason given as to the utter disappearence of the last two threads...

Hi Scooter...

I know....

Scott · #7 03-17-2004, 02:46 AM

I'm going to keep remaking it until the thread stays.

Damix2 · #8 03-17-2004, 03:20 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Scott
I'm going to keep remaking it until the thread stays.

Which is not allowed so there should be no reason you shouldn't be banned again

Darlene159 · #9 03-17-2004, 04:03 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Damix2

Which is not allowed so there should be no reason you shouldn't be banned again

I agree, but there is also no reason for the person who deleted the thread to forum pm the reason

Scott · #10 03-17-2004, 06:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Damix2

Which is not allowed so there should be no reason you shouldn't be banned again

So ban me.

criter · #11 03-17-2004, 07:04 AM

welcome back Scotty!

zs0 · #12 03-17-2004, 07:45 AM

Welcome back Scott.

haunter · #13 03-17-2004, 07:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Damix2

Which is not allowed so there should be no reason you shouldn't be banned again

All Scott is saying is "hello". I can understand if he kept remaking a thread with a subject that was against the rules, but he's not. Some people look at the rules in a far too literal sense.

Zethar · #14 03-17-2004, 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by haunter

All Scott is saying is "hello". I can understand if he kept remaking a thread with a subject that was against the rules, but he's not. Some people look at the rules in a far too literal sense.

Yah ;/
OMG YOU SIGS TOO BIG
OMG YOU POSTED AND EXE
OMG YOU EVADED BAN FILTER
OMG YOUR NAME IS HAUNTER

Damix2 · #15 03-17-2004, 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by haunter

All Scott is saying is "hello". I can understand if he kept remaking a thread with a subject that was against the rules, but he's not. Some people look at the rules in a far too literal sense.

But they are rules, so maybe a mod has a grudge against scott, too bad for him, he is not allowed to remake delted threads

Darlene159 · #16 03-17-2004, 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Damix2

But they are rules, so maybe a mod has a grudge against scott, too bad for him, he is not allowed to remake delted threads

That might be true, but I'm not removing it unless I get a valid reason for the other ones being closed =/

Damix2 · #17 03-17-2004, 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Darlene159
That might be true, but I'm not removing it unless I get a valid reason for the other ones being closed =/

I'm not saying remove it, also so everyone knows why a thread gets removed can't you post on one of the private forums?

haunter · #18 03-17-2004, 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Damix2

I'm not saying remove it, also so everyone knows why a thread gets removed can't you post on one of the private forums?

That's whats supposed to happen... 0.o; Something weird is just going on.

Geno · #19 03-18-2004, 06:27 AM

es tee ef u no0bz.

welcome back scottzor.

WanDaMan · #20 03-18-2004, 10:32 AM

Yohi, again..

Loriel · #21 03-18-2004, 02:56 PM

The rule is that if a thread is closed, the topic is not meant to be discussed. If that is the case, we may as well remove this forum. So... it is not making all that much sense.

Geno · #22 03-18-2004, 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Loriel
The rule is that if a thread is closed, the topic is not meant to be discussed. If that is the case, we may as well remove this forum. So... it is not making all that much sense.

The rules need to be re-done. damn dictators

Crono · #23 03-18-2004, 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Geno

The rules need to be re-done. damn dictators

About god damn time someone says it. Jebus Chwist!

Lance · #24 03-18-2004, 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Geno

The rules need to be re-done. damn dictators

Or, someone up high could post the usual, dimwitted explanation of why the previous hi threads were deleted.

You know, either way.

Darlene159 · #25 03-18-2004, 10:47 PM

The rules do not need to be redone, there just needs to be more communication between supermods, mods, admins, and players

haunter · #26 03-18-2004, 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Darlene159
The rules do not need to be redone, there just needs to be more communication between supermods, mods, admins, and players

The rules are just being taken too literally... People are letting a list of rules make their decisions for them, rather than thinking of every situation as a different one and using good judgement. The rules should be used as a basis for enforcement, not as a god.

Lance · #27 03-20-2004, 03:31 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by haunter

The rules are just being taken too literally... People are letting a list of rules make their decisions for them, rather than thinking of every situation as a different one and using good judgement. The rules should be used as a basis for enforcement, not as a god.

The problem lies not with the interpretation of the rules but with the understanding of it.

haunter · #28 03-20-2004, 03:43 AM

Then it is a problem with the interpretation... If they arent understanding, then they arent interpreting correctly... Or something... 0.o;

Anyway... ;-x

Lance · #29 03-20-2004, 11:11 PM

Wouldn't you argree that one must be able to understand what a rule says in order to draw some kind of meaning from it?

haunter · #30 03-21-2004, 12:06 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lance
Wouldn't you argree that one must be able to understand what a rule says in order to draw some kind of meaning from it?

Yes. That's quite obvious really... But wouldn't you agree that in order for someone to understand something, they have to do a good job interpreting it? I always thought "understand" and "interpret" were near-synonymous. Perhaps I was wrong. :|

Scott · #31 03-22-2004, 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by haunter

Yes. That's quite obvious really... But wouldn't you agree that in order for someone to understand something, they have to do a good job interpreting it? I always thought "understand" and "interpret" were near-synonymous. Perhaps I was wrong. :|

THIS THREAD IS ABOUT ME YO NUBLETS JEEZE D:<

Lance · #32 03-22-2004, 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by haunter

Yes. That's quite obvious really... But wouldn't you agree that in order for someone to understand something, they have to do a good job interpreting it? I always thought "understand" and "interpret" were near-synonymous. Perhaps I was wrong. :|

I just managed to severely confuse myself.

But, anyway, I see it kind of like this:

Interpreting the rules - assigning some kind of meaning to them based upon who you are and what you see them to mean.

Understanding the rules - grasping the reason that they exist in the first place.

There's a whole hell of a lot of the former occuring, and it's being done improperly because there isn't much of the latter.