Council Idea??

[emortylone]

What is this? I am not badmouthing the council. I'm saying I think the whole idea is a bit out of place at the moment, but means I still have to live with it. I think parts of the legal system are wrong, doesn't mean I will ignore it. I think I could make a difference. Just because I don't think it's the greatest idea doesn't mean I can't want to contribute and make Graal better =/
---Shifter

[KujaBTK]

admin takes care of the world too

[Torankusu]

Originally posted by KujaBTK
admin takes care of the world too

not as much as the MANAGER who TAKES CARE OF THE ADMINS.

[Timpan3]

Originally posted by Torankusu
not as much as the MANAGER who TAKES CARE OF THE ADMINS.

What drug where you on when you replied to his post? kidding

[HEALER101]

Originally posted by Timpan3

What drug where you on when you replied to his post? kidding

[emortylone]

*rolls* In 90% of the PW's, the Managers are rarely on, and they just idle and do crap x.X
---Shifter

[HEALER101]

Originally posted by emortylone
*rolls* In 90% of the PW's, the Managers are rarely on, and they just idle and do crap x.X
---Shifter

[BladeSpirit]

Mykel has been posting a lot o.0


I still don't like this council idea.

Unixmad could barely put his thoughts into English on the post, yet he wants to make a council?

Sorry, but you all know that it's true.

I doubt he'll ever have enough time to find anyone reliable in the graal world to be on the council; it won't work, it can't.

And until he realizes it can't, no more pw's will go up because he'll insist they go through the un-made council.


:grrr: NOT WERK WILL IT :grrr:

[Milkdude99]

Originally posted by emortylone
*rolls* In 90% of the PW's, the Managers are rarely on, and they just idle and do crap x.X
---Shifter

Not all Managers are *idle* or never on , ever think that when they seem to be idle they maybe taking care of problems and /or fixing things???

[Milkdude99]

Originally posted by AlexH
I won't vote for anyone whom nominated themselves.
If someone thinks you will do a good job you won't need to nominate yourself someone will say they think you would do a good job.

I agree , people who vote or nominate themselves are not secure in their own postion and lack self confidence in themselves , not a good choice indeed.

[Milkdude99]

Originally posted by Timpan3

But maybe people dont know of his and her skill, so I guess it's not ALL that bad to nominate yourself, but I wont either, I guess, unless someone I know will make a good work does nominate himself.

If you are good at what you do , then you will be known to those of who it counts , I am known to Stefan and Unixmad both and it is NOT because I went to them , but of what they have seen and heard from others.

[Milkdude99]

Originally posted by _0AfTeRsHoCk0_
The PW managers would pick either one of two people
1) Someone who is easy and will cleave to their consent every single time
2) Someone who knows they will fight for them for almost everything.

This is my opinion on things, though it could be wrong.

I would only vote for someone who is of "legal age" first off , second for someone who can convey the wishes of not just the Council to Unixmad but the players too in a way that would not be objectional to him.Demanding things to be done in a certain way as some would do will only bring rejection from Unixmad and certainly you don't argue with him and post anything negitive in a public forum about Graal. True some things need to change but you will only get change if it is approached in a reasonable and intelligent manner , there are not alot of canidates on Graal that would fit this criteria to be unbias and only interested in the future of Graal and not self interest and power, but there some and it is those I would vote for.