The Forest leadership poll

[konidias]

I would imagine there would be some sort of thing to determine the leader.. maybe another poll?

I mean it's pretty much 40+% to 40+%... even if one of us has a few more votes in the end, it would be awkward to declare them the winner. Simply because nearly half of the people voted for the other guy.. so I would imagine it would need to be more one sided...

[Borstelmann]

I say we take you two out and declare Porky winnur

[stefan76]

Originally posted by konidias
I would imagine there would be some sort of thing to determine the leader.. maybe another poll?

I mean it's pretty much 40+% to 40+%... even if one of us has a few more votes in the end, it would be awkward to declare them the winner. Simply because nearly half of the people voted for the other guy.. so I would imagine it would need to be more one sided...

And you've been waiting to say this until you lost? :/

I'm sure this would be the same words coming out of your mouth if you won...

/edit
Well you are winning now and You are still asking for a re-vote..

[stefan76]

Originally posted by Borstelmann
I say we take you two out and declare Porky winnur

nnoonono

We can do 2 things here :

1. Person with lowest vote count wins

2. Unixmad flips a coin on his nose while balancing 13 potatoes on his left big toe.

[konidias]

Originally posted by stefan76


And you've been waiting to say this until you lost? :/

I'm sure this would be the same words coming out of your mouth if you won...

I haven't lost.. I was ahead by 6 votes an hour ago.. It's just going back and forth. Yes I would have.

[_0AfTeRsHoCk0_]

Wow, just when you thought Brad ran away with it, Koni is back and only behind by one vote

[stefan76]

/joke!

OH NO. BRAD YOU BETTER GET ON AND ASK FOR A RE-VOTE BEFORE YOU LOSSSSSSSSSEEEEE.

[konidias]

Originally posted by stefan76
OH NO. BRAD YOU BETTER GET ON AND ASK FOR A RE-VOTE BEFORE YOU LOSSSSSSSSSEEEEE.

I knew someone would post something stupid about me asking for a revote. I just didn't think it would be you. You've turned into a real jerk.

If I jump ahead of Brad I still would want a new poll between me and Brad made.

[Borstelmann]

Originally posted by konidias


I knew someone would post something stupid about me asking for a revote. I just didn't think it would be you. You've turned into a real jerk.

If I jump ahead of Brad I still would want a new poll between me and Brad made.

We found our new Al Gore


BUSH!

[stefan76]

Originally posted by Borstelmann


We found our new Al Gore


BUSH!

Haha Hippie!




Konidias....

Meanie....

[feivel]

I think there should be a runover which is the following,
when there are more then two candidatesa there can be a runover if when the polls close no one has a majority of the total votes meaning if you add all the votes together to have a majority your votes must be more than half of the total votes...
if there is a runover (actually it might be called a runoff) then a new poll is taken where only the top two candidates are included and anyone who wishes can vote,
this is best because whoever wins they represent a majority of the population not that the group that supported them had more members then any other indavidual group, because if you scale it that way you could have 35 percent of the total population supporting you and everyone else doesnt support you,
and if you are very unpopular you will just get overthrown,
I think there should be a runoff if no one has a clear majority of the total votes

[Megamaniac]

Originally posted by Ghost Pirate
Konnie got my vote.


Sorry Brad but you got a bad record of leading kingdoms

[stefan76]

Originally posted by _0AfTeRsHoCk0_
Discuss here why you will vote for the person you chose, and reason why they are a good choice. No flaming please!

Konidias no flaming

I took my posts away / edited them because they were kinda flaming.

MEANIE GUY CALLING PEOPLES JERKSSSSSSSSSSSSS

[_0AfTeRsHoCk0_]

Originally posted by feivel
I think there should be a runover which is the following,
when there are more then two candidatesa there can be a runover if when the polls close no one has a majority of the total votes meaning if you add all the votes together to have a majority your votes must be more than half of the total votes...
if there is a runover (actually it might be called a runoff) then a new poll is taken where only the top two candidates are included and anyone who wishes can vote,
this is best because whoever wins they represent a majority of the population not that the group that supported them had more members then any other indavidual group, because if you scale it that way you could have 35 percent of the total population supporting you and everyone else doesnt support you,
and if you are very unpopular you will just get overthrown,
I think there should be a runoff if no one has a clear majority of the total votes

I think a runoff in this case is a terrible idea. All you're doing is delaying the process of kingdom isles being released, and there is no gaurantee, in fact, it is more likely there will be less votes for the runoff race. I don't want to wait for another 2-3 weeks before polls are finally done and leaders are chosen

[feivel]

Ok but if one person is elected and everyone that supports the other person plus people who supproted thirtd parties that now support the person who did not get elected will be angry and will take over by force