Should P2P playerworld owners be.. paid?

[konidias]

Originally posted by Nishoku
They shouldn't be paid, because stefan coded graal.. not p2p server owners. They are playing on his property, their playerworld is even their property, people submit playerworlds so they can have fun running it but in most cases it turns out negative.

It seems that most people submit playerworlds just to get them online.. they don't do anything with them after they get up... they just talk about how they are doing stuff, but you never see it.

I mean look at all the current P2P servers besides 2k1 and the UC servers.. they have like 1-5 people on it a day, and those don't stay but for 5 minutes.

I think the people that voted no basically misunderstood the question.. or didn't take the time to read it, because I can't find any reason why it wouldn't be good.. I have given valid reasons to all the people saying they shouldn't be paid.

I mean, you can't think about it in the current state of playerworlds.. because the current state isn't good.. it's the future state of playerworlds that this should be aimed for.. if the playerworld stinks... take it down for crying out loud.