gang limit

[Supaman771]

Originally Posted by WillaWonka

If we had average 200 players online then 50 cap, but since we have 80 average, a 25 cap is best.

Again, similar to Sales' mathematical solution as an example, this makes no sense and is pretty exaggerated.

Having 100 players online doesn't mean there's gonna be 10 gang members on, like-wise 50 gang members on doesn't mean there's 60 online.

The two numbers (player count and gang-membership) will rarely follow a trend. It'd be cool if we had a graph.

[The_Federov]

We have trials
nobody put them into this.

[bloodykiller]

sales is right

[Crow]

Originally Posted by bloodykiller

they

I've grown to hate this word while I was coding on Era.

[xTcDiabloxTc]

Originally Posted by Crow

I've grown to hate this word while I was coding on Era.

i miss you<3

[Crow]

Originally Posted by xTcDiabloxTc

i miss you<3

imissu2<3

[Gambet1337]

Era has a tendency of trying to implement failed idea. We already tried a gang limit and didn't improve anything

[DirtySk8erballs]

Slash and rogue are *****s, gang limit sucks!

[Dragon551]

Originally Posted by DirtySk8erballs

Slash and rogue are *****s

This wasn't needed. Keep those comments to yourself.

[WillaWonka]

Originally Posted by DirtySk8erballs

Slash and rogue are *****s, gang limit sucks!

learn 2 pk then it wouldnt be your problem.

[Frankie9011]

Never worked in the past and won't work now. Gang activity seems non-existent outside of events currently.

[Scoper]

I'm not sure how valid my opinion on this is, since I've been involved in gangs only ephemerally -- so just ignore me if you need to.

Anyways..I host gang events 3 times a week, and have been since before the update capping gang events. I've noticed a trend since the limit was implemented -- Gang activity has went down a slight amount. Where before, some gang matches (remember teams have to be even, requiring both gangs to have same players) would have an upwards of 9-10 people (except BB. never BB..), now that barely ever happens, and the average is 5-7 per match.

However, the gangs seem a lot more evened out now. Where some days two of the three gangs might have 10 or 11 people online and the third might have 6 before the gang limit update, now it seems much more consistent (as in, all gangs will have about the same amount of players online)

I don't know if either of these really shows anything substantial, but it's something to think about.

[Venom_Fish]

These overall equality of activity is due to the time-period (Summer Time).
However, the limited amount is due to the gang member limitation.
This issue and many others will soon be addressed in a more broader scope so personally, I don't see a point in even tampering with this anymore. Just hold on a bit.

[The_Federov]

The limit seem's to work. I mean, do the gangs even meet the gang limit anyways?

[bloodykiller]

Originally Posted by Scoper

I'm not sure how valid my opinion on this is, since I've been involved in gangs only ephemerally -- so just ignore me if you need to.

Anyways..I host gang events 3 times a week, and have been since before the update capping gang events. I've noticed a trend since the limit was implemented -- Gang activity has went down a slight amount. Where before, some gang matches (remember teams have to be even, requiring both gangs to have same players) would have an upwards of 9-10 people (except BB. never BB..), now that barely ever happens, and the average is 5-7 per match.

However, the gangs seem a lot more evened out now. Where some days two of the three gangs might have 10 or 11 people online and the third might have 6 before the gang limit update, now it seems much more consistent (as in, all gangs will have about the same amount of players online)

I don't know if either of these really shows anything substantial, but it's something to think about.

correction: gang activity has failed since gang limit PLUS gun nerfs