Payment Plans

[Geno]

i like the idea of free play with cash shops.
seems more profitable by a long run and for some reason it just sounds evil and awesome.

[Fulg0reSama]

Originally Posted by Geno

i like the idea of free play with cash shops.
seems more profitable by a long run and for some reason it just sounds evil and awesome.

[Zexon]

Originally Posted by Fulg0reSama

Tell me they arent making more money then most ....

[WaDaFack]

Originally Posted by Geno

i like the idea of free play with cash shops.
seems more profitable by a long run and for some reason it just sounds evil and awesome.

are people still going to be known as Graal#'s? :o

[Luda]

Originally Posted by WaDaFack

are people still going to be known as Graal#'s? :o

I hope not

[TSAdmin]

Originally Posted by WaDaFack

are people still going to be known as Graal#'s? :o

The two topics are unrelated, so it's unlikely to change just because of a change in payment plans.

[Crono]

Originally Posted by TSAdmin

The two topics are unrelated, so it's unlikely to change just because of a change in payment plans.

No they aren't. l2p

[TSAdmin]

Originally Posted by Crono

No they aren't. l2p

They're loosely related at best, but the point still stands that the Graal#'s are highly unlikely to be changed/removed at the change of a payment method.

[Crono]

Originally Posted by TSAdmin

They're loosely related at best, but the point still stands that the Graal#'s are highly unlikely to be changed/removed at the change of a payment method.

tru dat

also i think we should do what rufus suggested, it's better in the long run

[Rufus]

Originally Posted by Crono

also i think we should do what rufus suggested, it's better in the long run

I didn't suggest it, that's what they're doing apparently.

[Donark]

Originally Posted by TSAdmin

They're loosely related at best, but the point still stands that the Graal#'s are highly unlikely to be changed/removed at the change of a payment method.

Waaait, If I'm reading this right.. Why would they not remove the graal#s? Since there's no account upgrades/subscriptions, you never need to create a community name. So are they just going to take community names away? Or just let F2Ps make them? Which then defeats the whole purpose of the Graal#s and people "taking good names"

Hopefully that made sense D:

[kia345]

Originally Posted by Donark

Hopefully that made sense D:

It didn't, but neither did Graal#s, so it's okay

[TSAdmin]

Originally Posted by Donark

Waaait, If I'm reading this right.. Why would they not remove the graal#s? Since there's no account upgrades/subscriptions, you never need to create a community name. So are they just going to take community names away? Or just let F2Ps make them? Which then defeats the whole purpose of the Graal#s and people "taking good names"

Hopefully that made sense D:

Well, as far as this goes (and I'm just thinking outside the box, because what I meant was that just because one changes, doesn't guarantee something else will), it could still easily be utilised for the desire it was originally created for but give people the option of choosing a community name without requirement of upgrading. OR, you will only be allowed to choose a community name if you've made purchases from said shops. Again, just thinking outside the box there because that's not what I was talking about at all.

[defaultaccount]

Originally Posted by Geno

i like the idea of free play with cash shops.
seems more profitable by a long run and for some reason it just sounds evil and awesome.

what about being able to use graal$ to buy a gun or sword, also having a much larger cash shop.. I'm not really sure of how much of an 'economic impact' many of the servers would have, but I'm sure there is some sort of a middle ground with it..

i'd think f2p shouldn't be an option, but classic servers shouldn't be changed.
unless they Have to change. . . The Classic / gold is a good thing though, especially with the development servers. That being said can't see how alot of the people who have grown up on this, or played it for more than 5 years are strictly against paying a few dollars to support the servers and further Development of Graal..

i can see y if u have a classic account. idk not really @ all though

Originally Posted by MrAnonymous_P2P

Pardon me if I'm wrong, but I paid $50 for my account 8 years ago under the assumption that I would have a classic subscription for life. And if I am mistaken I bought my account under those terms.

Wouldn't it be illegal in some sense to revoke that?

that's the attitude bra. I don't think the player count has anything to do with the payment plans. And Or, wouldn't. There is only a lag of quality in some of the servers. My opinion is hypocritical because I can't explain why Zone has empty days at all. Being free game for so long and developing tendency of a 'open community ->staff economic flux' we'll say, so no one would like the idea of change or the idea 'professionalism' brought to most of the servers, anyone playing wouldn't really want that or consider it 'boring'. .

Things have been this way for a very long time, while its fun while it lasts, people know change is long overdue. That the game: graal, Deserves Change. so

i'm not saying everyone should be paying $ to play the game they love. Well I Am saying that. but what i'm really trying to say is idk why graal didn't blow up yet considering it's one of the 'Best Games' i've ever played, i'm sure most of the frequent players could concur ;]. More players to develop more servers more servers to develop more players. beget, beget, beget. I feel like Graal is at a tipping point and tuff decisions need to be made either way so I hope I don't cloud no ones judgment. I'm just trying to toss my 2 C at it u know.