Windows v6 beta test - Page 34

Crono · #**496** 08-08-2010, 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbk1994

I haven't noticed any problems.

apparently others in this thread have

cbk1994 · #**497** 08-09-2010, 09:38 PM

Stefan, this should give you an idea of how awfully the Graal client runs right now, and how urgently we need v6.

A phone should not run Graal better than a computer.

adam · #**498** 08-10-2010, 03:43 AM

Nice video. I heard they try to avoid taxing the iPhone client, this proves their wasting time, because windows users with much much more powerful machines can't handle the same things the iPhone can. hmm?

Crono · #**499** 08-10-2010, 06:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adam

Nice video. I heard they try to avoid taxing the iPhone client, this proves their wasting time, because windows users with much much more powerful machines can't handle the same things the iPhone can. hmm?

the iphone/ipod client is using v6 ircc

cbk1994 · #**500** 08-10-2010, 06:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crono

the iphone/ipod client is using v6 ircc

It's also using the Mac client which runs much better than the Windows client on identical hardware on v6.

Crono · #**501** 08-10-2010, 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbk1994

It's also using the Mac client which runs much better than the Windows client on identical hardware on v6.

sounds like a problem w/ graal

cbk1994 · #**502** 08-10-2010, 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crono

sounds like a problem w/ graal

It is. My point with the iPhone video is that the Windows client runs so awfully that an iPhone which has far inferior hardware to a PC can get better framerates. I didn't mean to make it sound like I was pointing out some flaw in Windows, sorry about that.

Crono · #**503** 08-10-2010, 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbk1994

It is. My point with the iPhone video is that the Windows client runs so awfully that an iPhone which has far inferior hardware to a PC can get better framerates. I didn't mean to make it sound like I was pointing out some flaw in Windows, sorry about that.

i forgive u onli cuz we cool``

Crow · #**504** 08-10-2010, 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbk1994

It's also using the Mac client which runs much better than the Windows client on identical hardware on v6.

Oh yes, that makes sense. So many players have a Mac

Fulg0reSama · #**505** 08-10-2010, 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbk1994

A phone should not run Graal better than a computer.

I agree, and this is coming from a guy with a computer that is barely more powerful than his own DSi.

Alure1316 · #**506** 08-11-2010, 06:54 AM

Stefan mentioned that over 100 players run Graal on Mac platforms somewhere.. Hmm

Crono · #**507** 08-11-2010, 07:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alure1316

Stefan mentioned that over 100 players run Graal on Mac platforms somewhere.. Hmm

thats a pretty low percentage

Skyld · #**508** 08-11-2010, 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crow

Oh yes, that makes sense. So many players have a Mac

It makes sense because Stefan develops Graal using Linux, and Linux and OS X are a damn sight more similar than Linux and Windows are. Incidentally, Chris' point was that the iPhone client is based off the OS X client, not that everyone in the world is using a Mac

Admins · #**509** 08-14-2010, 07:37 PM

So is the latest version working perfectly? Has anyone tried the -opengl option?

About fonts: fonts like tempus sans should be identical to v5, you can test it when setting the font size to 30.
On which server can I test the non-working text particles?

Crono · #**510** 08-14-2010, 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stefan

So is the latest version working perfectly?

http://forums.graalonline.com/forums...&postcount=468

Also it doesn't seem to remember positions/sizes of windows. For example on v5 I always have my Graal maximized (but not fullscreen). v6 doesn't remember this and starts not maximized. The playerlist and PM windows still open in weird positions (pm windows opening where your mouse x and y is) and it doesn't remember any resizes.