Crossdressers; a serious epidemic - Page 2

Knightess · #42 05-05-2010, 02:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crono

He/she is right! This thread could have been titled "Humans; a serious epidemic". I find that highly offensive and such a thread would have been made with the general idea to promote hate or humor at the expense of a certain group of individuals in our animal kingdom.

oplz

First Crono, I assure you. I am female.

Second
The fact is, it wasn't titled; "Humans, a serious epidemic", so save that argument for later please.
it was titled "Crossdressers a serious epidemic"
The way kale talks about them is in a dehumanizing manner. And gets humor at the expense of them. What if one of them is really passionate about this "crossdressing".
I for one, used to try on my cousins clothes when I visited his house. (He let me of course)
Not because I enjoyed "crossdressing" per se, it was more due to the fact that whenever my mother took me to my aunts, she would... put me in what you would call "girly clothes", like a dress for instance, and I hate dresses :/, I wore my cousins clothes at the time because it felt more comfortable. Isn't that SOOOOO funny?

I don't get why men have this big obsession with people who are more comfortable dressing in clothes specified for the other gender. It wouldn't surprise me if you all did it yourselves.

Kale, heres some advice. If you're that far into the closet that you're promoting hate against crossdressers to make yourself look less like one.
You should secretly go here http://www.crossdresserheaven.com/ca...esser-support/ (Courtesy of google)
Perhaps there you may be a little more at peace ja?

This is a graal forum, not the constructive place to discuss the issues with 'crossdressers' nor to seek support kale, I hope you will go to the above link

Again, hate thread, etc close, lock etc

kia345 · #43 05-05-2010, 02:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Knightess

taking this thread seriously

No fun allowed !!

Crono · #44 05-05-2010, 02:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Knightess

The fact is, it wasn't titled; "Humans, a serious epidemic", so save that argument for later please.
it was titled "Crossdressers a serious epidemic"

It wasn't titled "Black People, a serious epidemic" either but you still got to use it as an example to make a point?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Knightess

The way kale talks about them is in a dehumanizing manner. And gets humor at the expense of them. What if one of them is really passionate about this "crossdressing".

What? I thought tolerance and acceptance was all about making jokes about people as we do with eachother? There was nothing excessive said in this thread, like "KILL ALL CROSSDRESSERS". Just fun and games.

Knightess · #45 05-05-2010, 02:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crono

It wasn't titled "Black People, a serious epidemic" either but you still got to use it as an example to make a point?

No. It wasn't called Black People, a serious epidemic.
But making fun of a group of individuals who may be different for who they are, and what they may feel comfortable doing. Is really no different to racism.
That was the point I was making. And which is why this thread should be closed.

Quote:

Originally Posted by kia345

No fun allowed !!

I already had my fun, read above.

kia345 · #46 05-05-2010, 02:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Knightess

I already had my fun, read above.

Nothing about any of your posts seemed fun.

You don't seem fun.

Knightess · #47 05-05-2010, 02:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kia345

Nothing about any of your posts seemed fun.

You don't seem fun.

I'm writing a 2500 word human rights essay on same sex marriage, of course I'm not fun.
Especially when it comes to bigotry and one group thinking its allowed to make fun of another group, merely because the majority doesnt do it.
And as I have stated, its very similar to what man kind used to do with coloured people.
Around the early 1900s(?) Coloured people werent allowed to vote, were openly discriminated against by white people because they were the MINORITY.
Nobody cared if jokes were made at the expense of the coloured people, because well the majority werent coloured.

Seriously you guys, Show some evolution, you're repeating the same **** that was outlawed around the 1960s

kia345 · #48 05-05-2010, 02:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Knightess

I'm writing a 2500 word human rights essay on same sex marriage, of course I'm not fun.

I could write the same essay and make it a riot.

Rufus · #49 05-05-2010, 02:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Knightess

I'm writing a 2500 word human rights essay on same sex marriage, of course I'm not fun.

Suddenly everything makes sense.

Crono · #50 05-05-2010, 02:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Knightess

No. It wasn't called Black People, a serious epidemic.
But making fun of a group of individuals who may be different for who they are, and what they may feel comfortable doing. Is really no different to racism.
That was the point I was making. And which is why this thread should be closed.

But that's the point im trying to make, people poke fun at groups of people all of the time. So long as it isn't excessive and offensive it doesn't matter. There's a line the moderation draw on the extent of how offensive the content in question is. Honestly, this isn't out of line.

Knightess · #51 05-05-2010, 02:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crono

But that's the point im trying to make, people poke fun at groups of people all of the time. So long as it isn't excessive and offensive it doesn't matter. There's a line the moderation draw on the extent of how offensive the content in question is. Honestly, this isn't out of line.

"It doesn't matter" I love that attitude. So if something doesnt apply to you, or hurt you, it suddenly doesn't matter. Thats smart, no really.

Why don't you go back to the 1600s and you know, Buy some slaves.
It doesn't hurt you, so it doesnt matter!