Un...200

Crono1508 · #1 07-29-2009, 01:36 AM

Suggest/name something that would bring back the 200 Unholy Nation playercount.
(These are many responses from different players from Unholy Nation)

- 20 dollar classic and advertising
- funness...?
- Morality.
- This is why we can't have nice things.
- allowing laming again
- getting rid of wordfilters
- having staff not care about rules
- Nothing.
- Guilds....
- Removing Observer Mode for Trials..
- And bring back the old paying accounts system.
- firing all staff under the age of 18
- There's a lot of good ideas on the UN forums, it's just too bad that staffs don't read or post in any of them.
- rpg system
- A miracle.

LordSquirt · #2 07-29-2009, 01:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crono1508

- A miracle.

I like this one the best; made me lol

Crono1508 · #3 07-29-2009, 01:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LordSquirt

I like this one the best; made me lol

That one was Rufus, here's some more.

- Old mining
- Get rid of innactive staff
- Old Trial system back
- Old lifetime access to classic servers back

And a big paragraph (none of this is from me, I'm only presenting)

have a big donate button. lol... + advertisements... Or, have special in game items - lets say, erm... a car, make those p2p... a r2r p2p, to participate in big events (i don't know the names of them, uh... championship events, such as the big spar tourneys)

and if it goes free - up the development prices.

because more people on yer server is a good thing, you don't want to pay much for 20 people.

or, here is a good idea. actually make kingdoms a mmo... instead of a sand box with 8 monsters in it and a bunch of items.

kingdoms has a good concept, just put togeather terribly

i've talked to stephan about making playerworlds free - he said that graal isn't ready to go free 2 play yet, and i fully understand. but I mean, if it did... so many more players would want to play, want to make their own server, etc.

maybe give an option to servers if they want people to pay to play on their server, or if the server just wants to be free to play,

_Zelph · #4 07-29-2009, 01:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crono1508

- There's a lot of good ideas on the UN forums, it's just too bad that staffs don't read or post in any of them.

christopher: 156 posts
SwimChao: 99 posts
_Zelph: 81 posts
Joe: 68 posts
Flares: 55 posts
You: 12 posts

It's bad practice to base something on nothing

MysticX2X · #5 07-29-2009, 02:28 AM

-Reorganized Rules and GP Team so UN stops jailing/banning half of their playercount.
-Deletion of many lame NPC's
-Town center being non pkable again. Staff should do what's in the best interest of the players, and not the best interest of btk.

kia345 · #6 07-29-2009, 02:48 AM

Banning everyone who currently plays, and disabling mass messages for the new players.

Dark_Zeratul101 · #7 07-29-2009, 03:26 AM

Isn't laming already allowed? I logged on to UN today and I saw everyone throwing shurikens and this one guy had this lametastic poorly scripted two-handed sword thing. (Well technically, the gani swings one-handed but it's BIG)

papajchris · #8 07-29-2009, 04:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Zelph

christopher: 156 posts
SwimChao: 99 posts
_Zelph: 81 posts
Joe: 68 posts
Flares: 55 posts
You: 12 posts

It's bad practice to base something on nothing

156 posts isn't that much, so your proving his point

Elizabeth · #9 07-29-2009, 05:04 AM

holla holla at my post count

i'm not staff either D:

Tigairius · #10 07-29-2009, 05:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crono1508

Suggest/name something that would bring back the 200 Unholy Nation playercount.
(These are many responses from different players from Unholy Nation)

- funness...?
- This is why we can't have nice things.
- allowing laming again
- getting rid of wordfilters
- having staff not care about rules
- Nothing.
- A miracle.

These suggestions don't even make sense.

Elizabeth · #11 07-29-2009, 05:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tigairius

These suggestions don't even make sense.

removal of swear filter makes sense

_Zelph · #12 07-29-2009, 05:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by papajchris

156 posts isn't that much, so your proving his point

Do you even play UN anymore? The forums haven't even been out for 2 months. I see staff members posting on it every single day, especially when it's regarding the server. I have no clue what's making him think the staff don't post there when he hardly uses them himself

As for the swear filter, as long as you people give us a need to have one, it'll be there. This means you, Miss "If the word isn't filtered, it's okay to mass it" Elizabeth

Elizabeth · #13 07-29-2009, 06:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Zelph

Do you even play UN anymore? The forums haven't even been out for 2 months. I see staff members posting on it every single day, especially when it's regarding the server. I have no clue what's making him think the staff don't post there when he hardly uses them himself

As for the swear filter, as long as you people give us a need to have one, it'll be there. This means you, Miss "If the word isn't filtered, it's okay to mass it" Elizabeth

i hardly even swear, and if i do it's not directed at anyone o_o

but that is kind of ridiculous.. if the swear filter is there to block out vulgar words, why am i jailed for using words that aren't filtered but vulgar?

Crono1508 · #14 07-29-2009, 06:33 AM

Keep in mind Rage, that none of the suggestions that I've posted are mine.
I never said I agree or disagree with any of them. Those are player responses on
Unholy Nation.

_Zelph · #15 07-29-2009, 06:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elizabeth

i hardly even swear, and if i do it's not directed at anyone o_o

but that is kind of ridiculous.. if the swear filter is there to block out vulgar words, why am i jailed for using words that aren't filtered but vulgar?

Uh, because vulgar language is against the rules of conduct

_Zelph · #16 07-29-2009, 06:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crono1508

Keep in mind Rage, that none of the suggestions that I've posted are mine.
I never said I agree or disagree with any of them. Those are player responses on
Unholy Nation.

Oh, I'm sorry about that. I thought it was you.

Whoever did say that staff don't use the forums is a nutjob, though.

Elizabeth · #17 07-29-2009, 06:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Zelph

Uh, because vulgar language is against the rules of conduct

so shouldn't they be filtered?

_Zelph · #18 07-29-2009, 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elizabeth

so shouldn't they be filtered?

Why should we have to put a whole dictionary of cuss words AND their alternative spellings in the swear filter? YOU agreed to be bound to the rules of conduct upon registering an account. It's YOUR responsibility to follow them.

They don't cut off your hands because it's illegal to punch people. For God's sake...

Elizabeth · #19 07-29-2009, 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Zelph

Why should we have to put a whole dictionary of cuss words AND their alternative spellings in the swear filter? YOU agreed to be bound to the rules of conduct upon registering an account. It's YOUR responsibility to follow them.

They don't cut off your hands because it's illegal to punch people. For God's sake...

sooo these words are so vulgar that they're jailable, but they won't be filtered because you don't want to make the swear filter big? these are some of the most common and popular swears.. you don't have to get all technical with the words.

huh?

& we didn't say anything about evading the filter so i don't see why you mentioned it.

_Zelph · #20 07-29-2009, 07:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elizabeth

sooo these words are so vulgar that they're jailable, but they won't be filtered because you don't want to make the swear filter big?

When you start blocking every stupid little thing with the swear filter, you start being unable to say things like "It's a bit chilly outside" or "I was hit with a baseball"

I'd rather the swear filter be minimal and we just warn/jail the people who knowingly violate the rules of conduct

Elizabeth · #21 07-29-2009, 07:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Zelph

When you start blocking every stupid little thing with the swear filter, you start being unable to say things like "It's a bit chilly outside" or "I was hit with a baseball"

I'd rather the swear filter be minimal and we just warn/jail the people who knowingly violate the rules of conduct

i don't see how the term for the definition 'female dog' is a stupid little thing, i thought it was very popular actually.

_Zelph · #22 07-29-2009, 07:23 AM

We're getting in to semantics now? I'm done posting about this

Baszle · #23 08-18-2009, 10:14 PM

UN will never reach 200 players ever again. Just letting everyone know.

xnervNATx · #24 08-18-2009, 10:18 PM

attention everybody, delteria has hit 10 players

BigBear3 · #25 08-19-2009, 01:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crono1508

- rpg system

No.

Crono1508 · #26 08-19-2009, 02:09 AM

I realized that nobody actually read the suggestions, well anybody important so... why resurrect a dead topic.

Elizabeth · #27 08-19-2009, 05:54 AM

these threads get annoying after a while

BigBear3 · #28 08-19-2009, 07:30 AM

By Graalonline's current standards, Unholy Nation is doing just fine.

I want it to be a Jagd region without laws however.

Crono · #29 08-19-2009, 10:31 AM

It's more Graal's problem, not UN's.

Jugglernaut · #30 08-29-2009, 05:14 AM

If Classic Accounts were brought back, how much would you pay for one?

Depending on the answer to this question, I think that would determine whether or not they bring them back and fix the playercounts.

Me personally, I would pay atleast 50.00 USD for one.

salesman · #31 08-29-2009, 05:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jugglernaut

If Classic Accounts were brought back, how much would you pay for one?

Depending on the answer to this question, I think that would determine whether or not they bring them back and fix the playercounts.

Me personally, I would pay atleast 50.00 USD for one.

Crono1508 · #32 08-29-2009, 06:35 AM

I only gave Graal my money once.

James · #33 08-29-2009, 07:58 AM

I guess UN is lucky for the amount of people that have lifetime classic accounts or the playercount would suck even more.

Jugglernaut · #34 08-29-2009, 06:51 PM

James is absolutely right.

When I first started playing Graal "online" (long story), Classic Accounts were about 30.00 USD. I thought this was outrageous, so I didn't buy one. Now I realize that price is very fair. I still have a named trial account from late 2006, but sadly I forget the password to the e-mail registered to it.

Maybe this was planned by Unix so players would buy tons of Classic Accounts when they brought them back?

Imperialistic · #35 08-29-2009, 08:07 PM

You guys are looking like fools honestly.

BTW:
UN's 200 playercount, didn't just jump up and spread among other servers.
GRAAL's playercount decreased and therefore triggering a reaction for all servers to lose playercount. But yes UN could've done some preventing, but 1/3 of UN's players used to be trials, and 1/3 is quite a bit. Since the observer mode was implemented, whats the point of trials to even play UN anymore?

Jugglernaut · #36 08-29-2009, 08:11 PM

No wonder you have negative rep.

And besides, if Graal's overall playercount is low, bringing back Classic Accounts would help every server; not just Unholy Nation.

Vima · #37 08-29-2009, 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jugglernaut

No wonder you have negative rep.

And besides, if Graal's overall playercount is low, bringing back Classic Accounts would help every server; not just Unholy Nation.

Yeah, and lets not forget that when UN had 200players, atleast 70 people of them were trials. Today it's rare to even see one trial.

Jugglernaut · #38 08-29-2009, 08:35 PM

You're right, I shouldn't talk only about how Classic Accounts would help the playercounts.

When I was a normal trial, I didn't really pay attention to the others, so I can't really say much more.

I can, however, tell you how much fun it was getting 350G to buy a car and gas with old mining, and giving everyone EP when I was done playing events and was about to log off.