Bring back Classic levels and hit detection?

[Luda]

god bless ares

[jacob_bald6225]

Originally Posted by Ares

guys if i ever win the lottery i'll buy graal and make it free to play, i'll save graal..

We should start a Graal Classic lottery ticket pool just for this cause.

[MysticX2X]

Ares, you'd be paying a very very high amount.

[Rufus]

Could probably pay some professionals to make a better version for less.

[Graal_Master_19]

hmm i wonder how many votes its gonna take for it to take effect

[DarkCloud_PK]

Clearly all it takes is votes for something to magically take effect.

[Mark Sir Link]

Originally Posted by DarkCloud_PK

Clearly all it takes is votes for something to magically take effect.

Originally Posted by DarkCloud_PK

I approve of this thread, and nominate myself or thor for a new manager.
Someone who can listen and act on the players behalf.
This game is about the players, and listening to what they want and more importantly, acting on that.

Storm does the listening part, but is unable to act.

wut

[DarkCloud_PK]

Apparently you haven't been reading on what is possible vs. what the players want. Unless you have some magical wand that can get all the gigantic load of work done that is needed to implement all of this.

[Mark Sir Link]

so your plan was to listen and act on the players behalf only if it required you doing nothing to do so?

[BlackSolider]

More like the plan was to listen and act on the players behalf only if it was feasible.

[Rufus]

Originally Posted by Mark Sir Link

so your plan was to listen and act on the players behalf only if it required you doing nothing to do so?

How many people in this thread are asking for it and are actually players?

[Tyhm]

If you're going to challenge the validity of a definition, you should state what definition you're doubting. By this I mean, "How many are actually players?" - we all are, you can't vote unless you have a Graal account now can you?
If you mean to say "Players only means people who exclusively play Graal Classic and are on at least 3 days a week", you should say so, so we can all point and laugh. You have to do some tricksy tapdancing to find any Classic "players" by that kind of definition; in order to get a decent sample size you need a definition like "people who Have played Classic and Would be interested in playing again if it was awesome again"

[contego]

Originally Posted by Tyhm

If you're going to challenge the validity of a definition, you should state what definition you're doubting. By this I mean, "How many are actually players?" - we all are, you can't vote unless you have a Graal account now can you?
If you mean to say "Players only means people who exclusively play Graal Classic and are on at least 3 days a week", you should say so, so we can all point and laugh. You have to do some tricksy tapdancing to find any Classic "players" by that kind of definition; in order to get a decent sample size you need a definition like "people who Have played Classic and Would be interested in playing again if it was awesome again"

[Mark Sir Link]

Originally Posted by Rufus

How many people in this thread are asking for it and are actually players?

Come on Rufus, even you aren't this stupid.

What does being a player and asking for a certain direction have to do with one another?

If 49 people are interested in seeing it opposed to 12 or so who aren't which do you think would be the better move?

[MysticX2X]

Most of these people are voting without thinking whether it is plausible or not. Every player of Graal is entitled to their opinion of a server, and how it should go. But mostly, those players simply don't know the time it takes, even if it could take years.