Quote:
Originally Posted by Tigairius
They're both from the same era. So it is keeping true to original concepts.
|
Sounds good to me. I guess. I don't know. I don't really care that much. All I'm saying is that if Samurai started off as "No ninjas!", prospered on G2k1 as "No ninjas!", and so forth... then it should be "No ninjas!" still. But that's an "if", I'm not implying that's how it was, because I really have no clue. Being from the same era doesn't necessarily make it okay
if Samurai was supposed to be strictly samurai(s?).
Quote:
Originally Posted by kia345
The humans within Zormite are not "Zormites", they are members of the Zormite Republic.
Like a white man moving from California to India and becoming a citizen. No matter how hard he tries, he'll still be American and he'll still be right, but he'll also be a citizen within India, not a natural born Indian.
|
Oh, please, don't turn this into another "Zormites dont gotta be Zormites" argument. (though I guess you already did)
There's no good reason why the majority of Zormite should be human, and not of the Zormite race. (or even why a single Zormite should be non-Zormite)
I wasn't specifically talking about Zormite today, since I do applaud the fact that you, your subordinate leader, and possibly others use the Zormite head. But there's been plenty of times when the leaders, and almost nobody, or day I say definitely nobody, used the Zormite heads. What the hell is the purpose of having a fish-race kingdom if they won't play the role of a fish-race? It might as well be eliminated.
And your analogy fails unless you're bold enough to say that the difference between Indian humans and non-Indian humans is parallel to the difference between Zormites and humans.