Application: Kevin Azite

[Nabru]

Never, I would sooner die than you be a global of some sort.

[p2p_Sir_Link]

Originally Posted by Darlene159

This is an app for a global position. The banning on the forums is valid input, so what is your point?

following your philosophy, should it not be handled by PM?

Originally Posted by Nabru

Never, I would sooner die than you be a global of some sort.

calm down guy, it's a game.

[Darlene159]

Originally Posted by p2p_Sir_Link

following your philosophy, should it not be handled by PM?

No, since the applications are public to get peoples opinions. the opinions should be based on important things, and behavior on the forums is important.
I am the forums Admin, and I have the info to share. I can make a decision to make an exception because I deem it important, and Unixmad trusts me to do that

Originally Posted by p2p_Sir_Link

calm down guy, it's a game.

Is this going to be your reply to pwa issues?

[p2p_Sir_Link]

Originally Posted by Darlene159

No, since the applications are public to get peoples opinions. the opinions should be based on important things, and behavior on the forums is important.

Your opinion however, is based on information that is privy to the public, and is supposed to remain so. As I read in the rules, there is to be no discussion of bans, and now I feel that Graal Online has violated its agreement with me by violating its own rules.

I am the forums Admin, and I have the info to share. I can make a decision to make an exception because I deem it important, and Unixmad trusts me to do that

so in other words, its acceptable for GraalOnline to renege on its own rules at any time? Seems kind of unfair to the players, and I still feel as if my privacy has been greatly violated by your choice to be liberal about my previous
bans.

Originally Posted by unixmad

Threads are public and everyone can give feedback about what he/she think about someone. Feedback need to be about skills and not about personal attacks.

Also, what skill of mine are you commenting on? My skill to get banned? Seems more of a personal attack than a legitimate criticism of my ability to assist/administer Playerworlds.

[Darlene159]

Originally Posted by p2p_Sir_Link

Your opinion however, is based on information that is privy to the public, and is supposed to remain so. As I read in the rules, there is to be no discussion of bans, and now I feel that Graal Online has violated its agreement with me by violating its own rules.



so in other words, its acceptable for GraalOnline to renege on its own rules at any time? Seems kind of unfair to the players, and I still feel as if my privacy has been greatly violated by your choice to be liberal about my previous bans.

I am done trying to explain it to you....I'm not going to debate it, or argue with you. Read the forum rules in their entirety.

[p2p_Sir_Link]

Originally Posted by Darlene159

I am done trying to explain it to you....I'm not going to debate it, or argue with you. Read the forum rules in their entirety.

I took about a minute or so to skim the rules once again, and funnily enough, I cannot find any sort of immunity clause for admins/moderators in the rules.


EDIT: missed this part

Originally Posted by Darlene159

Is this going to be your reply to pwa issues?

I'd expect it to be reasonable of any PWA to attempt to calm down a disgruntled player who was threatening suicide over Graal.

I guess you, on the otherhand, would wish to encourage some sort of lawsuit...

[James]

Originally Posted by p2p_Sir_Link

Your opinion however, is based on information that is privy to the public, and is supposed to remain so. As I read in the rules, there is to be no discussion of bans, and now I feel that Graal Online has violated its agreement with me by violating its own rules.

so in other words, its acceptable for GraalOnline to renege on its own rules at any time? Seems kind of unfair to the players, and I still feel as if my privacy has been greatly violated by your choice to be liberal about my previous
bans.

While you are absolutely 100 percent correct in your statement, in my personal opinion I think it should be acceptable to bring things like banning up when you're applying for a global position. It's relevant information.

It's exactly like a background check when you apply for a real job.

[p2p_Sir_Link]

Originally Posted by James

While you are absolutely 100 percent correct in your statement, in my personal opinion I think it should be acceptable to bring things like banning up when you're applying for a global position. It's relevant information.

It's exactly like a background check when you apply for a real job.

Background checks are typically not released to the public. If she had a legitimate concern over my bans, rather than trying to tarnish my image to the public, she should have forwarded her concerns to the potential employer.

[Darlene159]

Originally Posted by p2p_Sir_Link

Background checks are typically not released to the public. If she had a legitimate concern over my bans, rather than trying to tarnish my image to the public, she should have forwarded her concerns to the potential employer.

Yes, and typically applications are not public

[James]

Originally Posted by p2p_Sir_Link

Background checks are typically not released to the public. If she had a legitimate concern over my bans, rather than trying to tarnish my image to the public, she should have forwarded her concerns to the potential employer.

Your image isn't going to be tarnished. You have a few nay-sayers, wait for people that support you to post. I guarantee your application is mainly what is looked at anyway. Public opinion really isn't going to matter here because no one has any rights on this forum anyway. The moderators and admins decide what is right from wrong in all cases.

HoudiniMan will probably choose the person with the most credentials. Don't sweat over it.

I vote for the president that I want, not that somebody else wants.