Sheep's little Guide on using GS2 in non-standard ways

[Twinny]

Do remember: scripts are compiled into bytecode and as such, I'm sure they do not give a **** however you name them. To care about such little stupid things....

[Angel_Light]

Originally Posted by Twinny

Do remember: scripts are compiled into bytecode and I'm sure they do not give a **** however you name them.

lol, that actually brought a tear to my eye. I have no life.

[coreys]

Originally Posted by Twinny

Do remember: scripts are compiled into bytecode and as such, I'm sure they do not give a **** however you name them. To care about such little stupid things....

A good point.

[Inverness]

Originally Posted by Twinny

Do remember: scripts are compiled into bytecode and as such, I'm sure they do not give a **** however you name them. To care about such little stupid things....

Of course the scripts don't care. If you'd read the thread instead of jumping in you'd notice the subject is about personal preference. Not about how Graal cares about the names since it doesn't at all.

Maybe you don't mind your scripts looking bad but if I were to choose from:
"SysMsg".addmsg();
or
SysMsg.addmsg();
I would choose the second option considering it looks better, its the more proper way, and its not highlighted in neon pink. The second option is only possible in the case that your weapon/object name doesn't have funky symbols in it.

If you want to name your objects with funky symbols, fine, it will just make your script look a bit worse when its really unnecessary. If you take advantage of public functions that is.

Originally Posted by Angel_Light

Organization is all point of view, same with styling and etc. This is a good example, I'll respect your guy's point of views and all, but I find it easier with my symbols. =P

Do you think about people other than yourself when you do that?

[Angel_Light]

Originally Posted by Inverness

blah

Do you think about people other than yourself when you do that?

Not really, since I know no one will use my scripts anyways. =P

[Twinny]

I saw the thread as showing the lesser known ways of using gscript which was quite good. After that, I saw you *****ing about 'personal preferences'.

Inverness is the reincarnation of Gambet

[Inverness]

Originally Posted by Twinny

I saw the thread as showing the lesser known ways of using gscript which was quite good. After that, I saw you *****ing about 'personal preferences'.

Inverness is the reincarnation of Gambet

I was just saying why its a good idea to not use funky characters in weapon names, so you can avoid script that looks like the ones in the initial post. Contribute or go away please, thanks. And stop *****ing about our discussion.

[cbk1994]

Originally Posted by Twinny

Inverness is the reincarnation of Gambet

So true.

Originally Posted by Inverness

I was just saying why its a good idea to not use funky characters in weapon names, so you can avoid script that looks like the ones in the initial post. Contribute or go away please, thanks. And stop *****ing about our discussion.

Someone doesn't play well with others.

[coreys]

Originally Posted by Twinny

Inverness is the reincarnation of Gambet

Except Inverness can script and isn't hated by everyone.

And is intelligent.

And doesn't have as big an ego. (Although he does have one)

[Inverness]

Originally Posted by coreys

And doesn't have as big an ego.

I beg to differ.

[Angel_Light]

Originally Posted by Inverness

I beg to differ.

lol, it is quite huge, I know this from experience, Odd part is that he has every right to have it. =P

[coreys]

Originally Posted by Inverness

I beg to differ.

You have a big ego, to be sure.

But nothing compared to Gambet.