Graal Forums  

Go Back   Graal Forums > Development Forums > Tech Support
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-17-2007, 12:11 PM
Crono Crono is offline
:pluffy:
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 20,000
Crono has a reputation beyond reputeCrono has a reputation beyond reputeCrono has a reputation beyond reputeCrono has a reputation beyond reputeCrono has a reputation beyond reputeCrono has a reputation beyond reputeCrono has a reputation beyond reputeCrono has a reputation beyond reputeCrono has a reputation beyond reputeCrono has a reputation beyond reputeCrono has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyld View Post
XP was awful. I would prefer Windows 2000 over XP anyday.
Why? I was on Windows 2000 for ages and just couldn't stand not having some of the XP features like the way folders are shown and such.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-17-2007, 01:17 PM
Skyld Skyld is offline
Script-fu
Skyld's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,914
Skyld has much to be proud ofSkyld has much to be proud ofSkyld has much to be proud ofSkyld has much to be proud ofSkyld has much to be proud ofSkyld has much to be proud of
Send a message via AIM to Skyld
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerami View Post
Why? I was on Windows 2000 for ages and just couldn't stand not having some of the XP features like the way folders are shown and such.
Windows 2000 was much more stable, the interface felt much more sharper and responsive, I prefer the way things were set out and I found it much easier to set up and use.

I don't recall there being any folder views that weren't in Windows 2000. There were even icon previews. The only thing that I liked about XP was the image preview window which was light and fast, but there's an equivalent program with Microsoft Office 2003 which solved that problem, too.
__________________
Skyld
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-17-2007, 01:44 PM
Crono Crono is offline
:pluffy:
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 20,000
Crono has a reputation beyond reputeCrono has a reputation beyond reputeCrono has a reputation beyond reputeCrono has a reputation beyond reputeCrono has a reputation beyond reputeCrono has a reputation beyond reputeCrono has a reputation beyond reputeCrono has a reputation beyond reputeCrono has a reputation beyond reputeCrono has a reputation beyond reputeCrono has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyld View Post
Windows 2000 was much more stable, the interface felt much more sharper and responsive, I prefer the way things were set out and I found it much easier to set up and use.
The two are equally stable in my opinion.

Quote:
I don't recall there being any folder views that weren't in Windows 2000. There were even icon previews. The only thing that I liked about XP was the image preview window which was light and fast, but there's an equivalent program with Microsoft Office 2003 which solved that problem, too.
XP has that "Windows Picture and Fax Viewer", folder thumbnails (if I recall correctly) looked aweful on Windows 2000, when trying to AIM someone a picture, you couldnt get thumbnail view on 2000 last I remembered, and I just like the overall look of XP better than the old 2000.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-19-2007, 03:50 AM
jonnyrocks2 jonnyrocks2 is offline
Registered User
jonnyrocks2's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Eastern Tennessee
Posts: 763
jonnyrocks2 will become famous soon enough
Send a message via AIM to jonnyrocks2 Send a message via MSN to jonnyrocks2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyld View Post
Windows 2000 was much more stable, the interface felt much more sharper and responsive, I prefer the way things were set out and I found it much easier to set up and use.

I don't recall there being any folder views that weren't in Windows 2000. There were even icon previews. The only thing that I liked about XP was the image preview window which was light and fast, but there's an equivalent program with Microsoft Office 2003 which solved that problem, too.
Hehe, Skyld, don't improperly shut your PC down. ( Unless if you got a recovery disk, or something. :3 )

Anyway, XP > Vista...at least until some decent programs come out for it...other then productivity crap.
__________________
Uri Vatsinov
Zormite Krew
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawn Kelfonne
Pfft. It takes a real man to play a girl...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-19-2007, 05:10 AM
Falcor Falcor is offline
Darth Cucumber
Falcor's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: At School
Posts: 2,874
Falcor is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to Falcor Send a message via AIM to Falcor Send a message via MSN to Falcor Send a message via Yahoo to Falcor
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonnyrocks2 View Post
Hehe, Skyld, don't improperly shut your PC down. ( Unless if you got a recovery disk, or something. :3 )

Anyway, XP > Vista...at least until some decent programs come out for it...other then productivity crap.
Productivity? I find it very hard to be productive when every action I make is assaulted by UAC's Cancel/Allow dialogs.
__________________

subliminal message: 1+1=3
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-19-2007, 05:14 AM
Devil Devil is offline
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,835
Devil has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Send a message via AIM to Devil Send a message via MSN to Devil
Quote:
Originally Posted by Falcor View Post
Productivity? I find it very hard to be productive when every action I make is assaulted by UAC's Cancel/Allow dialogs.
Grow a brain and disable it.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-19-2007, 05:24 AM
Falcor Falcor is offline
Darth Cucumber
Falcor's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: At School
Posts: 2,874
Falcor is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to Falcor Send a message via AIM to Falcor Send a message via MSN to Falcor Send a message via Yahoo to Falcor
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devil View Post
Grow a brain and disable it.
I still use XP. If the security features have to be disabled for me to do anything, then why bother upgrading?
__________________

subliminal message: 1+1=3
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-19-2007, 10:04 AM
CheeToS2 CheeToS2 is offline
That Guy
CheeToS2's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,528
CheeToS2 will become famous soon enough
Send a message via AIM to CheeToS2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Falcor View Post
I still use XP. If the security features have to be disabled for me to do anything, then why bother upgrading?
You only get UAC dialogs when something requires administrative privileges, meaning when you're changing some settings in the control panel, installing new programs, and some isolated instances where a regular program needs admin privileges. You see the most UAC dialogs when you are first setting everything up after installing the OS. I haven't disabled anything and it doesn't get in my way. It's basically sudo with a GUI.
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.