Should guilds with 0% activity be disbanded?

[Ibonic]

'Activity Percentile' (AP) is simply the percentage of Guild members that had put on the Guild Tag at least once within the past week (7 days). The value is rounded to one decimal.

Example: Your Guild has 48 members. 38 of them were online in the past 7 days and each had the Guild Tag on. Your Guild's AP would be: (38 / 48) x 100% = 79.2%

It should be extremely easy to keep a guild's activity > 0%; even one person can do it. So really this would only get rid of guilds that nobody (in the guild) seems to care about. In a way it makes me feel we should go by a higher percentage, but at least 0% is a start.

[WanDaMan]

Originally Posted by Ibonic

It should be extremely easy to keep a guild's activity > 0%; even one person can do it. So really this would only get rid of guilds that nobody (in the guild) seems to care about. In a way it makes me feel we should go by a higher percentage, but at least 0% is a start.

Thanks for those figures! I'm not a huge fan of any of this; the majority of people within my guild have left graal. I believe you should take in to consideration the ammount of people in the guild before you disbanden it aswell as several other key factors before you delete it because of it being inactive.

[Darlene159]

Originally Posted by Ibonic

It should be extremely easy to keep a guild's activity > 0%; even one person can do it. So really this would only get rid of guilds that nobody (in the guild) seems to care about. In a way it makes me feel we should go by a higher percentage, but at least 0% is a start.

Totally agree.

[Devil]

I really hope we don't see good guilds with an awesome history go down the drain.

[Darlene159]

Originally Posted by Devil

I really hope we don't see good guilds with an awesome history go down the drain.

History isn't worth squat if no one is wearing their tags in the guild.
If it were removed, maybe someone could remake it...I know it wouldn't be the same, but it is better then a completely dead guild.

[Infernix]

I voted Yes but then thought about ACT...and I wouldnt want that disbanned.

[Triple_Darkness]

Originally Posted by Devil

I really hope we don't see good guilds with an awesome history go down the drain.

Plus to what Darlene said If it was THAT great then it wouldn't be forgotten in our Heart's. DUHHHH

[Devil]

Originally Posted by Darlene159

History isn't worth squat if no one is wearing their tags in the guild.
If it were removed, maybe someone could remake it...I know it wouldn't be the same, but it is better then a completely dead guild.

I wouldn't want some newb bringing back Legend. It would totally defeat the purpose of how many people are left in it, and who was in it, for those reasons.


To the post above me, it isn't about forgotten guilds, it's about members growing up and leaving graal.

[Triple_Darkness]

Originally Posted by Devil

I wouldn't want some newb bringing back Legend. It would totally defeat the purpose of how many people are left in it, and who was in it, for those reasons.


To the post above me, it isn't about forgotten guilds, it's about members growing up and leaving graal.

What you're basicly saying is that "Guild's that's been with Graal for a long time and now its going to deleted and the hisory of that _____ (name here) will be lost and forgotten" and if you dont want noob's making it over well as what you have to in Life is to Deal about it

[Devil]

Please don't write posts to me, unless you can put some intelligence into them.

I know exactly what is going on, I _REALLY_ could care less if every guild were deleted.

[Triple_Darkness]

Originally Posted by Devil

Please don't write posts to me, unless you can put some intelligence into them.

I know exactly what is going on, I _REALLY_ could care less if every guild were deleted.

Then stop complaining about guild's that were here for like ever then?

[Devil]

I wasn't complaining, I was voicing my opinion. Like I said, in future, if you want a decent response from someone.. please use some intelligence in your posts.

[konidias]

Originally Posted by WanDaMan

Thanks for those figures! I'm not a huge fan of any of this; the majority of people within my guild have left graal. I believe you should take in to consideration the ammount of people in the guild before you disbanden it aswell as several other key factors before you delete it because of it being inactive.

If they leave Graal then they shouldn't be in the guild. People think of guilds like they are little tags you can wear just for fun. They are supposed to be so that people can be in groups together, like a club. You don't keep club members in your club who don't show up for months at a time.

I'm 100% for this idea. Remove inactive guilds! Anyone who is against the idea are the same people who just want to be able to use the tag for whenever they feel the desire. This is not "a group of people get together so we can get a kewl tag!", this is supposed to be so that people can group together and form their own little community within Graal.

[Minoc]

Originally Posted by Triple_Darkness

What you're basicly saying is that "Guild's that's been with Graal for a long time and now its going to deleted and the hisory of that _____ (name here) will be lost and forgotten" and if you dont want noob's making it over well as what you have to in Life is to Deal about it

The whole point of this thread is to find a solution that'd satisfy as many players as possible.
You can't tell someone to deal with something that hasn't been decided.

[Brad]

im fine with 0% all the guilds I am in I try to go in-game and wear my tag for a little atleast once a month

NBK and Leet are the only tags worth wearing