Should guilds with 0% activity be disbanded?

[Curt1zzle]

I voted no, but I have no argument.

[Chompy]

Originally Posted by Darlene159

if the old guild is to stay, someone should be appointed acting leader, or something, to make it active again.

Well, would be hard to make 'paused' active again ( over 0%)
It is currently at -1619%

Well, I am not against it, but would be hard to keep old known guilds and such..

[Ibonic]

Originally Posted by Chompy

Well, would be hard to make 'paused' active again ( over 0%)
It is currently at -1619%

...

That's its rating, the activity percentile is currently 4.2%

[Chompy]

Originally Posted by Ibonic

That's its rating, the activity percentile is currently 4.2%

hmm, my bad

Ok, I agree now, with this :o

[Crow]

Originally Posted by Minoc

%0 activity, after a month.
Old guilds (5 years or older) should stay regardless.

Originally Posted by Rufus

Yes, that's perfect.

This would add function to VIP (ignore the Gold, in my opinion that's for different purposes).

Originally Posted by Ibonic

I guess maybe this also shouldn't apply if the guild leader has an active VIP (or Gold?) subscription.

Originally Posted by hampy

I vote yes, after 1 month of inactivity. But the leader of the guild should be told to sort it out after say 3 weeks

<3

[maximus_asinus]

Originally Posted by Crimson2005

1 month of inactivity

I agree, one month is plenty of time.

Originally Posted by hampy

I vote yes, after 1 month of inactivity. But the leader of the guild should be told to sort it out after say 3 weeks

Possibly an e-mail, or even an NPC server notification, with the warning.

Originally Posted by nikomi946

I would say a 6 month time frame since many who are in college and universities often have rather long absences but do return. Or there's that nasty addiction to other online games that often keep them away for awhile.

If the ENTIRE guild is away to University... well, I don't know, that just sounds so stupid. Disban the guild.

Originally Posted by Ibonic

I guess maybe this also shouldn't apply if the guild leader has an active VIP (or Gold?) subscription.

No, everyone should be effected, they are neglecting/ignoring their guild, and just burdening the guild system having inactive guilds.

Originally Posted by Minoc

%0 activity, after a month.
Old guilds (5 years or older) should stay regardless.

I agree, and disagree. I'd love to see them stay, it serves as a reminder to old times, but at the same time I want everyone to be treated equally, and if the guilds were allowed to die out completely, they should finish the cycle and be disbanned. Maybe an immunity list, once old guilds like this are disbanned, they are not allowed to be remade?

[Crono]

Originally Posted by Darlene159

I would say that a guild leader should have another person to take over if they have to go away for an extended amount of time, if they care about the guild..

i dont think guilds should be policed like this...

[Triple_Darkness]

Originally Posted by Gerami

i dont think guilds should be policed like this...

It help's finding what guild that's active that you want to join instead of looking though ton's of unactive guild's which make's it quite harder to find what your working for and becuase more than half of those page's are filled with 0% activity...1 Month is good yes

[Darlene159]

Originally Posted by Minoc

If the guild has %0 of activity, who could be appointed leader?

Good point, then it should be removed like any other guild. What is the sense of having a guild with 0 activity?

[Triple_Darkness]

Originally Posted by Minoc

If the guild has %0 of activity, who could be appointed leader?

Maybe the person that has the most activity? if the Leader hasnt don anything about the guild in a month. The most Active person in that guild become's Guild Leader (if VIP) and if it doesnt work in a few week's it is therefore disbaned?
[edit]It has it around what 10 maybe 5 for it to stay living? and if it git's 0 again its disbaned?[/edit]

[Darlene159]

Originally Posted by Triple_Darkness

Maybe the person that has the most activity? and if it doesnt work in a week it is therefore disbaneded

lol, the point was alread made there if there is 0 activity, then there is 0 activity.

[Chompy]

hmm, what if the guild just barely makes like 0.1% - 0.2% and it won't be disbaneded.. that sounds weird :o

[WanDaMan]

If I were the only one still wearing my tag on & off - would my guild be removed?

[Triple_Darkness]

Originally Posted by WanDaMan

If I were the only one still wearing my tag on & off - would my guild be removed?

If the Activity isnt 0 and is like 0.1 then no it wouldn't :O

[WanDaMan]

Originally Posted by Triple_Darkness

If the Activity isnt 0 and is like 0.1 then no it wouldn't :O

Ok, fair enough. Is the % of activity determined by the number of people within the guild?