Should guilds with 0% activity be disbanded?

[Triple_Darkness]

Originally Posted by WanDaMan

If I were the only one still wearing my tag on & off - would my guild be removed?

If the Activity isnt 0 and is like 0.1 then no it wouldn't :O

[WanDaMan]

Originally Posted by Triple_Darkness

If the Activity isnt 0 and is like 0.1 then no it wouldn't :O

Ok, fair enough. Is the % of activity determined by the number of people within the guild?

[Ibonic]

'Activity Percentile' (AP) is simply the percentage of Guild members that had put on the Guild Tag at least once within the past week (7 days). The value is rounded to one decimal.

Example: Your Guild has 48 members. 38 of them were online in the past 7 days and each had the Guild Tag on. Your Guild's AP would be: (38 / 48) x 100% = 79.2%

It should be extremely easy to keep a guild's activity > 0%; even one person can do it. So really this would only get rid of guilds that nobody (in the guild) seems to care about. In a way it makes me feel we should go by a higher percentage, but at least 0% is a start.

[WanDaMan]

Originally Posted by Ibonic

It should be extremely easy to keep a guild's activity > 0%; even one person can do it. So really this would only get rid of guilds that nobody (in the guild) seems to care about. In a way it makes me feel we should go by a higher percentage, but at least 0% is a start.

Thanks for those figures! I'm not a huge fan of any of this; the majority of people within my guild have left graal. I believe you should take in to consideration the ammount of people in the guild before you disbanden it aswell as several other key factors before you delete it because of it being inactive.

[konidias]

Originally Posted by WanDaMan

Thanks for those figures! I'm not a huge fan of any of this; the majority of people within my guild have left graal. I believe you should take in to consideration the ammount of people in the guild before you disbanden it aswell as several other key factors before you delete it because of it being inactive.

If they leave Graal then they shouldn't be in the guild. People think of guilds like they are little tags you can wear just for fun. They are supposed to be so that people can be in groups together, like a club. You don't keep club members in your club who don't show up for months at a time.

I'm 100% for this idea. Remove inactive guilds! Anyone who is against the idea are the same people who just want to be able to use the tag for whenever they feel the desire. This is not "a group of people get together so we can get a kewl tag!", this is supposed to be so that people can group together and form their own little community within Graal.

[Darlene159]

Originally Posted by Ibonic

It should be extremely easy to keep a guild's activity > 0%; even one person can do it. So really this would only get rid of guilds that nobody (in the guild) seems to care about. In a way it makes me feel we should go by a higher percentage, but at least 0% is a start.

Totally agree.

[sam_is_me]

Originally Posted by Ibonic

It should be extremely easy to keep a guild's activity > 0%; even one person can do it. So really this would only get rid of guilds that nobody (in the guild) seems to care about. In a way it makes me feel we should go by a higher percentage, but at least 0% is a start.

Like you said, most guilds that have 0% have members/leaders that probably have forgotten about the guild all together. Either that, or they don't care much about their guild to be responsible to log on once a week, recruit some active guild members, and start over.

Either that, or if you knew you couldn't log off, find someone trustworthy that plays graal that might could take your position as Guild Leader.